Dataset Information

Production and provenance of architectural glass from the Umayyad period.

ABSTRACT: A large assemblage (n = 307) of architectural glasses (tesserae and windows) from the early 8th-century Umayyad residential site at Khirbat al-Minya was analysed by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Trace element patterns are essential to establish the provenance of the base glass, while the comparative evaluation of the colouring and opacifying additives allow us to advance a production model for the manufacture of glass mosaic tesserae during the early Islamic period. The primary glass types are Levantine I and Egypt 1a, as well as a few older, reused tesserae, and Mesopotamian plant ash glass used for amber-coloured window fragments. Chemical data revealed fundamental differences in the colouring and opacification technologies between the Egyptian and Levantine tesserae. Co-variations of lead and bismuth, and copper, tin and zinc in the Egypt 1a tesserae provide first evidence for the production of different mosaic colours in a single workshop, specialising in the manufacture of tesserae of different colours. No such trend is apparent in the Levantine samples. Red, cobalt blue and gold leaf tesserae were found to be exclusively made from a Levantine base glass, indicating that the generation of some colours may have been a specialised process. The same may apply to the amber-coloured window glass fragments of Mesopotamian origin that exhibit very unusual characteristics, combining elevated copper (2% CuO) with an excess in iron oxide (5% Fe2O3). These findings have significant implications for the production model of strongly coloured glass and the exploitation of resources during the early Islamic period.

SUBMITTER: Adlington LW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7521681 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Production and provenance of architectural glass from the Umayyad period.

Adlington Laura Ware LW Ritter Markus M Schibille Nadine N

PloS one 20200928 9

A large assemblage (n = 307) of architectural glasses (tesserae and windows) from the early 8th-century Umayyad residential site at Khirbat al-Minya was analysed by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Trace element patterns are essential to establish the provenance of the base glass, while the comparative evaluation of the colouring and opacifying additives allow us to advance a production model for the manufacture of glass mosaic tesserae during the early Islamic period ...[more]

PMID: 32986774

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: Many computational methods are available for assembly and annotation of newly sequenced microbial genomes. However, when new genomes are reported in the literature, there is frequently very little critical analysis of choices made during the sequence assembly and gene annotation stages. These choices have a direct impact on the biologically relevant products of a genomic analysis--for instance identification of common and differentiating regions among genomes in a comparison, or identification of enriched gene functional categories in a specific strain. Here, we examine the outcomes of different assembly and analysis steps in typical workflows in a comparison among strains of Vibrio vulnificus. RESULTS: Using six recently sequenced strains of V. vulnificus, we demonstrate the "alternate realities" of comparative genomics, and how they depend on the choice of a robust assembly method and accurate ab initio annotation. We apply several popular assemblers for paired-end Illumina data, and three well-regarded ab initio genefinders. We demonstrate significant differences in detected gene overlap among comparative genomics workflows that depend on these two steps. The divergence between workflows, even those using widely adopted methods, is obvious both at the single genome level and when a comparison is performed. In a typical example where multiple workflows are applied to the strain V. vulnificus CECT 4606, a workflow that uses the Velvet assembler and Glimmer gene finder identifies 3275 gene features, while a workflow that uses the Velvet assembler and the RAST annotation system identifies 5011 gene features. Only 3171 genes are identical between both workflows. When we examine 9 assembly/annotation workflow scenarios as input to a three-way genome comparison, differentiating genes and even differentially represented functional categories change significantly from scenario to scenario. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistencies in genomic analysis can arise depending on the choices that are made during the assembly and annotation stages. These inconsistencies can have a significant impact on the interpretation of an individual genome's content. The impact is multiplied when comparison of content and function among multiple genomes is the goal. Tracking the analysis history of the data--its analytic provenance--is critical for reproducible analysis of genome data.

Dataset Information

Production and provenance of architectural glass from the Umayyad period.

Publications

Production and provenance of architectural glass from the Umayyad period.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets