Dataset Information

Insight into an Oxidative DNA-Cleaving DNAzyme: Multiple Cofactors, the Catalytic Core Map and a Highly Efficient Variant

ABSTRACT: Summary An oxidative DNA-cleaving DNAzyme (PL) employs a double-cofactor model “X/Cu2+” for catalysis. Herein, we verified that reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH), flavin mononucleotide, cysteine, dithiothreitol, catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone, phloroglucinol, o-phenylenediamine, 3,3?,5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine, and hydroxylamine acted as cofactor X. According to their structural similarities or fluorescence property, we further confirmed that reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), 2-mercaptoethanol, dopamine, chlorogenic acid, resveratrol, and 5-carboxyfluorescein also functioned as cofactor X. Superoxide anions might be the commonality behind these cofactors. We subsequently determined the conservative change of individual nucleotides in the catalytic core under four different cofactor X. The nucleotides A4 and C5 are highly conserved, whereas the conservative levels of other nucleotides are dependent on the types of cofactor X. Moreover, we observed that the minor change in the PL's secondary structure affects electrophoretic mobility. Finally, we characterized a highly efficient variant T3G and converted its double-cofactor NADH/Cu2+ to sole-cofactor NADH. Graphical Abstract Highlights • An oxidative cleavage DNAzyme works with various cofactor X• Catalytic nucleotide conservation fluctuates with different cofactor X• The PL DNAzyme's minor secondary structure change affects electrophoretic mobility• Double-cofactor model of the variant T3G can be converted to sole-cofactor model Chemistry; Biochemistry; Biocatalysis

SUBMITTER: Yu W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7522124 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Transcriptional cofactors communicate regulatory cues from enhancers to promoters and are central effectors of transcription activation and gene expression, which is a hallmark of all multicellular organisms. However, the extent to which different cofactors display intrinsic specificity for distinct promoters is unclear. Testing intrinsic COF – CP preferences requires the systematic assessment of transcriptional activation for many CPs in the presence or absence of a given COF in an otherwise constant standardized reporter system. We therefore combined a plasmid-based high-throughput reporter assay, Self-Transcribing Active Core Promoter-sequencing (STAP-seq), with the specific recruitment of individual COFs to create a high-throughput activator bypass-like assay. Using this assay, we tested whether 23 different individually tethered Drosophila melanogaster COFs could activate transcription from any of 72,000 CP candidates in S2 cells. We selected COFs that represent different functional classes and enzymatic activities: histone-acetyl transferases (Nejire - the fly ortholog of CBP/P300, Mof, Gcn5 - ortholog of pCAF, Atac2, Tip60, Br140), three components of the COMPASS-like histone H3K4 methyltransferase complexes (Lpt, Trr and Trx), nucleosome remodeling ATP-ase (Brm), two Chromo or Chromo-shadow domain (Chro and Mof) and three Bromodomain (Brd8, Brd9 and fs(1)h - ortholog of Brd4) -containing COFs, three subunits of the Mediator Complex (MED15, MED24 and MED25), three subunits of the TFIID general transcription factor (Taf4, Tbp and Trf2) and three less well-characterized COFs (EMSY, Gfzf and Pzg). We used the strong transcriptional activator P65 as a positive and GFP as a negative control. In addition, we tested 6 COFs and the 2 controls in two other Drosophila cell lines: ovarian somatic cells (OSC) and Kc167 cells. We uncovered five classes of core promoters, distinguished by their differential response to specific cofactors and by the presence of known sequence elements, such as the TATA-box, Down-stream Promoter Element, or TCT motif. Moreover, the five promoter types show distinct chromatin properties at endogenous loci. The observed compatibilities between cofactors and promoters can explain how different enhancers specifically activate distinct sets of genes, alternative promoters within the same genes, or even distinct transcription starting sites within the same promoters. Thus, cofactor–promoter compatibilities may underlie distinct transcriptional programs.

Dataset Information

Insight into an Oxidative DNA-Cleaving DNAzyme: Multiple Cofactors, the Catalytic Core Map and a Highly Efficient Variant

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets