Dataset Information

Relative Morbidity and Mortality of Panniculectomy-Combined Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To examine intraoperative and postoperative complication rates for surgical staging combined with panniculectomy for endometrial cancer. METHODS:A prospectively collected institutional surgical database was used to identify patients with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging between December 2008 and August 2014 (n = 551). The cases were grouped into surgical staging with panniculectomy (panniculectomy group, n = 11 [2.0%]), laparotomy without panniculectomy (laparotomy group, n = 208 [37.7%]), and laparoscopy (minimally invasive surgery group, n = 332 [60.3%]). Major complication and surgical wound complication rates within 30 days from surgery were compared. RESULTS:The panniculectomy group had a significantly higher body mass index compared with other approaches (panniculectomy group, laparotomy group, and minimally invasive surgery group: 60.4, 35.7, and 34.1; P < 0.001) and had a high stage I disease rate (90.9%, 61.5%, and 88.3%; P < 0.001). Mean pannus weight was 5733 g (4.4% of body weight). Intraoperative major complication rates were statistically nonsignificant across the groups (0%, 7.2%, and 4.2%; P = 0.23); however, the panniculectomy group had a significantly higher postoperative major complication rate compared with other approaches (36.4%, 16.3%, and 5.1%; P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis controlling for age, ethnicity, body habitus, medical comorbidities, and tumor factors, panniculectomy remained an independent predictor for increased risk of postoperative major complications (adjusted odds ratio, 4.37; P = 0.043). Surgical mortality rates were similar across the groups (0%, 0.5%, and 0%; P = 0.44). Among superobese patients (n = 50), intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were statistically similar across the 3 groups (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION:Although panniculectomy-combined surgical staging is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications, the majority recovered uneventfully, making this approach a feasible treatment option, especially for superobese patients with endometrial cancer.

SUBMITTER: Ramzan AA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7523235 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Relative Morbidity and Mortality of Panniculectomy-Combined Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer.

Ramzan Amin A AA Garcia-Sayre Jocelyn J Hom Marianne S MS Graham Kyle A KA Carey Joseph N JN Muderspach Laila I LI Matsuo Koji K

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society 20151001 8

<h4>Objective</h4>To examine intraoperative and postoperative complication rates for surgical staging combined with panniculectomy for endometrial cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>A prospectively collected institutional surgical database was used to identify patients with endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging between December 2008 and August 2014 (n = 551). The cases were grouped into surgical staging with panniculectomy (panniculectomy group, n = 11 [2.0%]), laparotomy with ...[more]

PMID: 26270120

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to identify risk factors associated with laparotomy conversion during total laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. METHODS:This is a retrospective study examining endometrial cancer cases that underwent hysterectomy-based surgical staging initiated via conventional laparoscopic approach. Factors related to patient, tumor, and surgeon were examined to establish risk of laparotomy conversion using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS:There were 251 cases identified including 30 cases (12.0%) of laparotomy conversion. The most common indication for laparotomy conversion was a large uterus (27.0%), followed by extensive adhesions (24.3%) and surgical complications (18.9%). Outcomes of cases resulting in laparotomy conversion include longer surgical time (333 vs 224 minutes, P < 0.001), larger blood loss (350 vs 100 mL, P < 0.001), longer hospital stay (4 vs 2 days, P < 0.001), and increased risk of hospital readmission (10% vs 1.4%, P = 0.024). In multivariate analysis, morbid obesity (odds ratio [OR], 4.51; P = 0.011), suboptimal pelvic examination or enlarged uterus during preoperative evaluation (OR, 3.55; P = 0.034), para-aortic lymphadenectomy (OR, 10.5; P = 0.001), uterine size 250 g or greater (OR, 3.49; P = 0.026), and extrauterine disease (OR, 4.68; P = 0.012) remained the independent predictors for laparotomy conversion. The following numbers of risk factors were significantly correlated with laparotomy-conversion rate: none, 1.1%; single risk factor, 5.3% (OR, 5.00; P = 0.15); double risk factors, 21.7% (OR, 24.9; P = 0.002); and triple or more risk factors, 50% (OR, 90.0; P < 0.001). Ultrasonographic 3-dimensional volumes of 496 cm in preoperative uterine size correlate with actual uterine weight of 250 g (Y = 61.5 + 0.38X, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Laparotomy conversion significantly impacts outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer. In this setting, our predictive model for laparotomy conversion will be useful to guide the surgical management of endometrial cancer.

Project description:ImportanceCurrently, rates of referral of patients with peritoneal metastasis in the United States who qualify for cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) are low, in part because of the misperception of high morbidity and mortality rates. However, patients requiring major gastrointestinal surgical procedures with similar complication rates are routinely referred.ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative safety of CRS/HIPEC.Design, setting, and participantsRetrospective cohort study of 34 114 patients who underwent CRS/HIPEC, right lobe hepatectomy, trisegmental hepatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and esophagectomy between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, included in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database. Data analysis was performed in 2018.Main outcomes and measuresData from the NSQIP database were used to compare perioperative and 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality rates of CRS/HIPEC (1822 patients) with other, well-accepted, high-risk surgical oncology procedures: right lobe hepatectomy (5109 patients), trisegmental hepatectomy (2449 patients), pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) (16 793 patients), and esophagectomy (7941 patients).ResultsFor 34 114 patients, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 63 (55-71) years and 42% were female. Patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC tended to be younger, with a median age of 57 years, and esophagectomy had the highest median (IQR) American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (3 [3-3]). When compared with CRS/HIPEC, higher complication rates were reported in the following categories: (1) superficial incisional infection in Whipple and esophagectomy (5.4% [95% CI, 4.4%-6.4%] vs 9.7% [95% CI, 9.3%-10.1%] and 7.2% [95% CI, 6.6%-7.8%], respectively; P < .001); (2) deep incisional infection in Whipple (1.7% [95% CI, 1.1%-2.3%] vs 2.7% [95% CI, 2.5%-2.9%]; P < .01); (3) organ space infection in right lobe hepatectomy (7.2% [95% CI, 6.0%-8.4%] vs 9.0% [95% CI, 8.2%-9.8%]; P = .02), trisegmental hepatectomy (12.4% [95% CI, 11.1%-13.7%]; P < .001), and Whipple (12.9% [95% CI, 12.4%-13.4%]; P < .001); and (4) return to the operating room for esophagectomy (6.8% [95% CI, 5.6%-8.0%] vs 14.4% [95% CI, 13.6%-15.2%]; P < .001). Median (IQR) length of hospital stay was lower in CRS/HIPEC (8 [5-11] days) than Whipple (10 [7-15] days) and esophagectomy (10 [8-16] days) (P < .001). Overall 30-day mortality was lower in CRS/HIPEC (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.6%) compared with Whipple (2.5%; 95% CI, 2.3%-2.7%), right lobe hepatectomy (2.9%; 95% CI, 2.4%-3.4%), esophagectomy (3.0%; 95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%), and trisegmental hepatectomy (3.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-4.7%) (P < .001).Conclusions and relevanceComparative analysis revealed CRS/HIPEC to be safe, often safer across the spectrum of NSQIP safety metrics when compared with similar-risk oncologic procedures. Patient selection was important in achieving observed outcomes. High complication rates are a misperception from early CRS/HIPEC experience and should no longer deter referral of patients to experienced centers or impede clinical trial development in the United States.

Project description:The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the Timed Up and Go test and postoperative morbidity and 1-year mortality, and to compare the Timed Up and Go to the standard-of-care surgical risk calculators for prediction of postoperative complications.In this prospective cohort study, patients 65 years and older undergoing elective colorectal and cardiac operations with a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. The Timed Up and Go test was performed preoperatively. This timed test starts with the subject standing from a chair, walking 10 feet, returning to the chair, and ends after the subject sits. Timed Up and Go results were grouped as fast ? 10 seconds, intermediate = 11-14 seconds, and slow ? 15 seconds. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the 3 Timed Up and Go groups to current standard-of-care surgical risk calculators at forecasting postoperative complications.This study included 272 subjects (mean age of 74 ± 6 years). Slower Timed Up and Go was associated with increased postoperative complications after colorectal (fast 13%, intermediate 29%, and slow 77%; P < 0.001) and cardiac (fast 11%, intermediate 26%, and slow 52%; P < 0.001) operations. Slower Timed Up and Go was associated with increased 1-year mortality following both colorectal (fast 3%, intermediate 10%, and slow 31%; P = 0.006) and cardiac (fast 2%, intermediate 3%, and slow 12%; P = 0.039) operations. Receiver operating characteristic area under curve of the Timed Up and Go and the risk calculators for the colorectal group was 0.775 (95% CI: 0.670-0.880) and 0.554 (95% CI: 0.499-0.609), and for the cardiac group was 0.684 (95% CI: 0.603-0.766) and 0.552 (95% CI: 0.477-0.626).Slower Timed Up and Go forecasted increased postoperative complications and 1-year mortality across surgical specialties. Regardless of operation performed, the Timed Up and Go compared favorably to the more complex risk calculators at forecasting postoperative complications.

Project description:Introduction Opioid derivates are an essential part of everyday clinical pain management practice. They have excellent analgesic, sedative, and sympatholytic effects and are widely used in various conditions. Beyond advantageous aspects, there are numerous problems with the chronic use of these agents. Dependency and life-threatening complications are the biggest problems with both illegal and prescribed opioid derivates. In our current study, effects of chronic opioid use were observed on mortality and life quality in the case of vascular surgery. Methods This prospective, observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2017. After obtaining informed consent, all participants were asked to fill a questionnaire containing different psychological tests. Perioperative data, chronic medical therapy, and anthropometric data were also collected. Opioid user and non-user patients' psychological results were compared with non-parametrical tests. The effect of chronic opioid administration was investigated with logistic regression method with bootstrapping. Results Finally, the data of 164 patients were analyzed. 64.0% of participants were male, the mean age was 67.05 years, and the standard deviation was 9.48 years. The median follow-up time was 1312 days [interquartile range (IQR): 930-1582 days]. During the follow-up time, 42 patients died (25.6%). In the examined patient cohort, the frequency of opioid derivate use was 3.7% (only six patients). In the non-survived group, opioid use was significantly higher (1.6% vs. 9.5%, p=0.019). Significant differences were found in the aspect of cognitive performance measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), opioid users have had lower points [25.5 (IQR: 24.5-26.0) vs. 28.0 (IQR: 27.0-29.0) p=0.008]. Opioid users have showed higher score on Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) [15.5 (IQR: 10.0-18.0) vs. 6.0 (IQR: 3.0-11.0), p=0.030). In a multivariate Cox regression model built up from registered preoperative medical treatment, opioids were found as a risk factor for all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR): 4.31, 95% CI: 1.77-10.55, p=0.001]. Conclusion Our current findings suggest that chronic, preoperative use of opioids could associate with increased mortality. Furthermore, both decrease in cognitive performance and increased depression symptoms were found in the opioid user cohorts which emphasize the importance of further risk stratification of these patients.

Dataset Information

Relative Morbidity and Mortality of Panniculectomy-Combined Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer.

Publications

Relative Morbidity and Mortality of Panniculectomy-Combined Surgical Staging in Endometrial Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets