Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Head-to-head evaluation on diagnostic accuracies of six SARS-CoV-2 serological assays.


ABSTRACT: In this study, we evaluated and compared six SARS-CoV-2 serology kits including the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, Beckman Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, OCD Vitros OCD Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total antibody assay, Roche Elecsys Anti SARS-CoV-2 assay, Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total assay, and cPass surrogate viral neutralising antibody assay. A total of 336 non-duplicated residual serum samples that were obtained from COVID-19 confirmed patients (n=173) on PCR and negative controls (n=163) obtained pre-December 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic were used for the study. These were concurrently analysed on the different immunoassay platforms and correlated with clinical characteristics. Our results showed all assays had specificity ranging from 99.3% to 100.0%. Overall sensitivity across all days of symptoms, in descending order were OCD (49.1%, 95% CI 41.8-56.5%), cPass (44.8%, 95% CI 37.5-52.3%), Roche (41.6%, 95% CI 34.5-49.0%), Siemens (39.9%, 95% CI 32.9-47.3%), Abbott (39.8%, 95% CI 32.9-47.3%) and Beckman (39.6%, 95% CI 32.5-47.3%). Testing after at least 14 days from symptom onset is required to achieve AUCs greater than 0.80. OCD and cPass performed the best in terms of sensitivity for >21 days symptoms with 93.3% (95% CI, 73.5-99.2%) and 96.7% (95% CI, 82.8-99.9%), respectively. Both also shared the greatest concordance, kappa 0.963 (95% CI 0.885-1.0), p<0.001, and had the lowest false negative rates. Serology results should be interpreted with caution in certain cases. False negatives were observed in a small number of individuals with COVID-19 on immunosuppressive therapy, pauci-symptomatic or who received antiretroviral therapy. In conclusion, all assays exhibited excellent specificity and total antibody assays with spike protein configurations generally outperformed nucleocapsid configurations and IgG assays in terms of diagnostic sensitivity.

SUBMITTER: Tan SS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7524664 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Head-to-head evaluation on diagnostic accuracies of six SARS-CoV-2 serological assays.

Tan Shaun S SS   Saw Sharon S   Chew Ka Lip KL   Huak Chan Yiong CY   Khoo Candy C   Pajarillaga Anastacia A   Wang Weixuan W   Tambyah Paul P   Ong Lizhen L   Jureen Roland R   Sethi Sunil K SK  

Pathology 20200930 7


In this study, we evaluated and compared six SARS-CoV-2 serology kits including the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, Beckman Access SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, OCD Vitros OCD Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Total antibody assay, Roche Elecsys Anti SARS-CoV-2 assay, Siemens SARS-CoV-2 Total assay, and cPass surrogate viral neutralising antibody assay. A total of 336 non-duplicated residual serum samples that were obtained from COVID-19 confirmed patients (n=173) on PCR and negative controls (n=163) obtained pre-December 2  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7273265 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8378065 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8339017 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8289701 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8377389 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7263247 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8272050 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8111122 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7417972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8789399 | biostudies-literature