Dataset Information

Diagnostic practices for patients with shortness of breath and presumed obstructive airway disorders: a cross-sectional analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Dyspnea is a common symptom that has many causes, including obstructive airway disorders. We sought to examine previous diagnosis of obstructive airway disorders and other conditions in patients receiving treatment with inhaled medications for shortness of breath in a community setting.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients aged 18 years and older receiving treatment for shortness of breath with inhaled medications for a minimum of 6 months. Study participants were recruited through community pharmacies in Edmonton and Saskatoon, Canada, between February 2009 and February 2012. Previous diagnosis of obstructive airway disorders by a primary care provider was assessed by patient self-report and review of health records. We conducted an assessment (as per guidelines from the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society), including pulmonary function tests; diagnoses were adjudicated by an expert physician panel (2 respirologists and 1 emergency physician). The agreement between diagnoses derived from pulmonary function tests and diagnoses from primary care providers was evaluated.

Results

A total of 328 patients (median age 50 yr, 57.3% female) underwent assessment; 134 (40.9%) of patients reported ever having a pulmonary function test performed. After adjudication, 138 (42.1%) were diagnosed with asthma only, 86 (26.2%) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease only and 11 (3.4%) with both. Some patients (93, 28.4%) had no evidence of obstructive airway disorders and 20 (6.1%) had evidence of other conditions that cause shortness of breath, such as heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Overall, 62 (18.9%) patients could not be assigned a diagnosis.

Interpretation

In a group of community-based patients with shortness of breath being treated with inhalers, less than half ever had pulmonary function tests performed, and a considerable proportion had no evidence of lung disease or other conditions. These findings highlight the need for confirmatory testing, including pulmonary function tests, before prescribing inhalers for patients with presumed obstructive airway disorders.

SUBMITTER: Tsuyuki RT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7527250 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul-Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Diagnostic practices for patients with shortness of breath and presumed obstructive airway disorders: a cross-sectional analysis.

Tsuyuki Ross T RT Midodzi William W Villa-Roel Cristina C Marciniuk Darcy D Mayers Irvin I Vethanayagam Dilini D Chan Michael M Rowe Brian H BH

CMAJ open 20200701 3

<h4>Background</h4>Dyspnea is a common symptom that has many causes, including obstructive airway disorders. We sought to examine previous diagnosis of obstructive airway disorders and other conditions in patients receiving treatment with inhaled medications for shortness of breath in a community setting.<h4>Methods</h4>This cross-sectional study included consecutive patients aged 18 years and older receiving treatment for shortness of breath with inhaled medications for a minimum of 6 months. S ...[more]

PMID: 32978240

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIn out-of-hours primary care (OHS-PC), semi-automatic decision support tools are often used during telephone triage. In the Netherlands, the Netherlands Triage Standard (NTS) is used. The NTS is mainly expert-based and evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of the NTS' urgency allocation against clinically relevant outcomes for patients calling with shortness of breath (SOB) is lacking.MethodsWe included data from adults (≥18 years) who contacted two large Dutch OHS-PC centres for SOB between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021 and whose follow-up data about final diagnosis could be retrieved from their own general practitioner (GP). The diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI)) of the NTS' urgency levels (high (U1/U2) versus low (U3/U4/U5) and 'final' urgency levels (including overruling of the urgency by triage nurses or supervising general practitioners (GPs)) was determined with life-threatening events (LTEs) as the reference. LTEs included, amongst others, acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, acute heart failure and severe pneumonia.ResultsOut of 2012 eligible triage calls, we could include 1833 adults with SOB who called the OHS-PC, mean age 53.3 (SD 21.5) years, 55.5% female, and 16.6% showed to have had a LTE. Most often severe COVID-19 infection (6.0%), acute heart failure (2.6%), severe COPD exacerbation (2.1%) or severe pneumonia (1.9%). The NTS urgency level had a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI 0.50-0.61) and specificity of 0.61 (95% CI 0.58-0.63). Overruling of the NTS' urgency allocation by triage nurses and/or supervising GPs did not impact sensitivity (0.56 vs. 0.54, p = 0.458) but slightly improved specificity (0.61 vs. 0.65, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe semi-automatic decision support tool NTS performs poorly with respect to safety (sensitivity) and efficiency (specificity) of urgency allocation in adults calling Dutch OHS-PC with SOB. There is room for improvement of telephone triage in patients calling OHS-PC with SOB.Trial registrationThe Netherlands Trial Register, number: NL9682 .

Project description:ObjectivesTo test the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the 13-item Shortness of Breath with Daily Activities (SOBDA) questionnaire, and determine the threshold for response and minimal important difference (MID).Design6 week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Setting40 centres in the USA between 29 October 2009 and 1 July 2010.Primary and secondary outcome measures547 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were enrolled and 418 entered the 2-week run-in period. Data from the run-in period were collected to test internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity and known-groups validity of the SOBDA. Three hundred and sixty six patients were randomised 2:2:1 to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 µg, salmeterol 50 µg or placebo, twice daily. Results from the SOBDA questionnaire, Patient Global Assessment of Change Question, modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale (mMRC), Clinician Global Impression of Dysponea Severity (CGI-S), Clinician Global Impression of Change Question and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire self-administered standardised version (CRQ-SAS) were evaluated; spirometry and safety parameters were measured. Study endpoints were selected to investigate the cross-sectional and longitudinal validity of the SOBDA questionnaire in relation to the clinical criteria.ResultsInternal consistency of the SOBDA questionnaire (Cronbach α) was 0.89. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation) was 0.94. The SOBDA weekly scores correlated with the patient-reported and clinician-reported mMRC, CGI-S and CRQ-SAS dyspnoea domain scores (0.29, 0.24, 0.24 and -0.68, respectively). The SOBDA weekly scores differentiated between the responders and the non-responders as rated by the patients and the clinicians. Anchor-based and supportive distribution-based analyses produced a range of the potential values for the threshold for the responders and MID.ConclusionsThe 13-item SOBDA questionnaire is reliable, valid and responsive to change in patients with COPD. On using anchor-based methods, the proposed responder threshold shows a -0.1 to -0.2 score change. A specific threshold value will be identified as more data are generated from future clinical trials.Trial registrationNCT00984659; GlaxoSmithKline study number: ASQ112989.

Project description:BackgroundResearch examining associations between air pollution exposure and respiratory symptoms in adults has generally been inconclusive. This may be related in part to sample size issues, which also preclude analysis in potentially vulnerable subgroups.ObjectivesWe estimated associations between air pollution exposures and the prevalence of wheeze and shortness of breath using harmonized baseline data from two very large European cohorts, Lifelines (2006-2013) and UK Biobank (2006-2010). Our aim was also to determine whether the relationship between air pollution and respiratory symptom prevalence differed between individuals with different characteristics.MethodsCross-sectional analyses explored associations between prevalence of self-reported wheeze and shortness of breath and annual mean particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm, 2.5-10μm, and <10μm (PM2.5, PMcoarse, and PM10, respectively) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations at place of residence using logistic regression. Subgroup analyses and tests for interaction were performed for age, sex, smoking status, household income, obesity status, and asthma status.ResultsAll PM exposures were associated with respiratory symptoms based on single-pollutant models, with the largest associations seen for PM2.5 with prevalence of wheezing {odds ratio (OR)=1.16 per 5μg/m³ [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 1.21]} and shortness of breath [OR=1.61 per 5μg/m³ (95% CI: 1.45, 1.78)]. The association between shortness of breath and a 5-μg/m³ increment in PM2.5 was significantly higher for individuals from lower-[OR=1.73 (95% CI: 1.52, 1.97)] versus higher-income households [OR=1.31 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.55); p-interaction=0.005), whereas the association between PM2.5 and wheeze was limited to lower-income participants [OR=1.30 (95% CI: 1.22, 1.38) vs. OR=1.02; (95% CI: 0.96, 1.08); p-interaction<0.001]. Exposure to NO2 also showed positive associations with wheeze and shortness of breath.ConclusionExposure to PM and NO2 air pollution was associated with the prevalence of wheeze and shortness of breath in this large study, with stronger associations between PM2.5 and both outcomes among lower- versus higher-income participants. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1353.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:Recent work has suggested that within-breath respiratory impedance measurements performed using the forced oscillation technique may help to noninvasively evaluate respiratory mechanics. We investigated the influence of airway obstruction on the within-breath forced oscillation technique in smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients and evaluated the contribution of this analysis to the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS:Twenty healthy individuals and 20 smokers were assessed. The study also included 74 patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We evaluated the mean respiratory impedance (Zm) as well as values for the inspiration (Zi) and expiration cycles (Ze) at the beginning of inspiration (Zbi) and expiration (Zbe), respectively. The peak-to-peak impedance (Zpp=Zbe-Zbi) and the respiratory cycle dependence (?Zrs=Ze-Zi) were also analyzed. The diagnostic utility was evaluated by investigating the sensitivity, the specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01888705. RESULTS:Airway obstruction increased the within-breath respiratory impedance parameters that were significantly correlated with the spirometric indices of airway obstruction (R=-0.65, p<0.0001). In contrast to the control subjects and the smokers, the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients presented significant expiratory-inspiratory differences (p<0.002). The adverse effects of moderate airway obstruction were detected based on the Zpp with an accuracy of 83%. Additionally, abnormal effects in severe and very severe patients were detected based on the Zm, Zi, Ze, Zbe, Zpp and ?Zrs with a high degree of accuracy (>90%). CONCLUSIONS:We conclude the following: (1) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease introduces higher respiratory cycle dependence, (2) this increase is proportional to airway obstruction, and (3) the within-breath forced oscillation technique may provide novel parameters that facilitate the diagnosis of respiratory abnormalities in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Project description:BackgroundIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive interstitial lung disease that often causes disabling dyspnea. In IPF and other lung diseases, patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-questionnaires designed to gather information from the patient's perspective-can determine whether therapies affect dyspnea or other outcomes meaningful to patients. Before a PRO can be used confidently as an outcome measure in a longitudinal trial, studies must demonstrate the PRO's ability to capture change over time in the target population. Our goal in this study was to examine whether the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire does so in patients with IPF.MethodsWe used data from the Sildenafil Trial of Exercise Performance in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (STEP-IPF) to perform analyses that examined associations between UCSD scores and five external measures (anchors) at baseline and over time. Anchors included the Activity domain from St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-A), the Physical Functioning domain from the SF-36 (SF36-PF), forced vital capacity (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and distance walked during a timed walk test (6MWD). Linear regression models were used to examine relationships between UCSD scores and anchors over time.ResultsAt baseline, UCSD scores were weakly correlated with percent predicted FVC (-0.21, p = 0.005) and percent predicted DLCO (-0.20, p = 0.008), moderately correlated with 6MWD (-0.39, p < 0.0001) and strongly correlated with SGRQ-A (0.79, p < 0.0001) and SF36-PF (-0.72, p < 0.0001). Change over time in UCSD scores was associated with change in FVC (estimate = 2.54, standard error [SE] = 1.23, p = 0.04), SGRQ-A (estimate = 7.94, SE = 1.11, p < 0.0001), SF36-PF (estimate = 6.00, SE = 1.13, p < 0.0001), and 6MWD (estimate = 4.23, SE = 1.18, p = 0.0004) but not DLCO (estimate = 0.33, SE = 1.33, p = 0.80).ConclusionsThese results support the validity of the UCSD to assess change in dyspnea over time in patients with IPF.

Dataset Information

Diagnostic practices for patients with shortness of breath and presumed obstructive airway disorders: a cross-sectional analysis.

Background

Methods

Results

Interpretation

Publications

Diagnostic practices for patients with shortness of breath and presumed obstructive airway disorders: a cross-sectional analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets