Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Chondral Defect Repair With Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

ABSTRACT: Chondral defects of the knee are prevalent and often encountered during arthroscopic procedures. Despite the limited healing potential of chondral defects, several treatment options have been proposed. However, microfracture, osteochondral autograft (or allograft) transfer, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation are all associated with their respective shortcomings. As such, the optimal treatment for chondral defects of the knee remains unclear. Recently, many authors have advocated treating chondral defects with biological therapies and scaffold-based treatments. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate, a cell-based injection, has gained particular attention because of its differentiation capacity and potential role in tissue regeneration. In addition, scaffold cartilage treatments have emerged and reached clinical practice. BioCartilage is one form of scaffold, which consists of extracellular matrix, and has been claimed to promote the regeneration of hyaline-like cartilage. This article presents our technique of arthroscopic chondral defect repair using BMAC and BioCartilage.

SUBMITTER: Davila Castrodad IM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7528213 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Arthroscopic Chondral Defect Repair With Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

Dávila Castrodad Iciar M IM Mease Samuel J SJ Werheim Erik E McInerney Vincent K VK Scillia Anthony J AJ

Arthroscopy techniques 20200906 9

Chondral defects of the knee are prevalent and often encountered during arthroscopic procedures. Despite the limited healing potential of chondral defects, several treatment options have been proposed. However, microfracture, osteochondral autograft (or allograft) transfer, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation are all associated with their respective shortcomings. As such, the optimal treatment for chondral defects of the knee remains unclea ...[more]

PMID: 33024662

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo compare the outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of focal chondral defects (FCDs) of the knee joint with chondroplasty versus bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and cartilage-derived matrix (CDM) implantation.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with Outerbridge grade 3-4 FCDs. Patients were included if they were treated arthroscopically with BMAC/CDM implantation or chondroplasty alone between March 2016 and May 2019 and had more than 1-year follow-up. Postoperative outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores; Knee Outcome Survey (KOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sports subscores; postoperative corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections; subsequent surgeries; and conversion to total knee arthroplasty.ResultsA total of 98 patients were identified with a mean follow-up in BMAC/CDM of 24 months (range 13-41 months) and in chondroplasty of 44 months (range 34-55 months). A subanalysis was performed to control for significant differences in age, which yielded 39 patients, ages 40-60 years. Within the subanalysis group, mean VAS scores were significantly lower in the BMAC/CDM group (1.7 vs 4.4; P = .005) and mean UCLA scores were significantly greater (7.1 vs 5.0; P = .002). Mean improvement in VAS and UCLA scores were similar between the BMAC/CDM and chondroplasty groups (-3.7 vs -1.3; P = .71, 1.9 vs 0.1; P = .14, respectively). Mean KOS ADL and Sports subscores were significantly greater among patients in the BMAC/CDM group (87% vs 55%; P = .001, 71% vs 41%; P = .002, respectively). There were no differences in postoperative injections, subsequent surgeries, or conversion to total knee arthroplasty between the BMAC/CDM and chondroplasty groups.ConclusionsPatients with grade 3-4 FCDs of the knee had improved postoperative outcomes when treated with BMAC/CDM implantation versus chondroplasty alone, as evidenced by a significant improvement in VAS and UCLA scores and significantly greater postoperative KOS ADL, and KOS Sport subscores.Level of evidenceIV, therapeutic case series.

Project description:PurposeTo assess the postoperative objective, subjective, and functional outcomes as well as complication rates in osteochondral defect patients treated with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and cartilage-derived matrix (CDM) during knee arthroscopy.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed for patients treated arthroscopically with BMAC and CDM between August 2015 and August 2018 and had more than 1-year follow-up. Demographic factors such as age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities were collected for all patients. Size and location of the osteochondral lesions also were documented.ResultsA total of 14 patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 19 months. On average, patients were 34 years of age (range 16-58 years) and 43% were female. Postoperatively, knee flexion increased by 8° from 124° to 132° (P = .002). All patients regained full extension; however, 1 patient later acquired a 2° extension contracture after a traumatic event. The average hamstring strength significantly increased from 4.1 to 4.6 postoperatively (P = .33). The average quadriceps strength significantly increased from 4.0 to 4.5 postoperatively (P = .007). Mean visual analog scale scores significantly decreased postoperatively (4.5 vs 1.4; P = .001). There was a significant increase in Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living scores (53.8 vs 92.9; P = .007). Mean Knee Outcome Survey-Sports scores also increased, although this was nonsignificant (28.2 vs 79.5; P = .560). No significant differences were noted in pain and functional outcomes when stratified by the osteochondral defect size and location. Complications included a stitch abscess, Baker's cyst, and residual pain treated with hyaluronic acid injection.ConclusionsThis study demonstrated arthroscopic BMAC and CDM implantation appears to be safe and has the potential to improve patient outcomes in the short-term postoperative period.Level of evidenceIV, therapeutic case series.

Dataset Information

Arthroscopic Chondral Defect Repair With Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

Publications

Arthroscopic Chondral Defect Repair With Extracellular Matrix Scaffold and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets