Dataset Information

Increasing antiviral treatment uptake improves survival in patients with HBV-related HCC.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Antiviral treatment is known to improve survival in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, the treatment uptake in CHB patients remains low. We aimed to report the secular trend in antiviral treatment uptake from 2007-2017, and to compare the effect of different nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) initiation times (before vs. after HCC diagnosis) on survival.

Methods

A 3-month landmark analysis was used to compare overall survival in patients not receiving NA treatment (i.e. no NA), patients receiving NAs after their first HCC treatment (i.e. post-HCC NA), and patients receiving NAs ≤3 months before their first HCC treatment (i.e. pre-HCC NA). A propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to balance clinical characteristics between the 3 groups and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

Results

The uptake of antiviral treatment in HCC patients increased from 47.3% in 2007 to 98.3% in 2017. The pre-HCC NA group contributed mostly to the uptake rate, which increased from 72.7% to 96.0% in the past decade. In addition, 3,843 CHB patients (407 no NA; 2,932 pre-HCC NA; 504 post-HCC NA) with HCC, receiving at least 1 type of HCC treatment, were included in the analysis. Lack of NA treatment at the time of HCC diagnosis increased the risk of death (weighted HR 3.05; 95% CI 2.70-3.44; p <0.001). The impact of the timing of NA treatment was insignificant (weighted HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.78-1.04; p = 0.161).

Conclusions

The uptake of antiviral treatment in HCC patients increased over the past decade. NA treatment, regardless of whether it was initiated before or after HCC diagnosis, improved survival. It is never too late to initiate NA treatment, even after HCC diagnosis.

Lay summary

More and more patients who have hepatitis B-related liver cancer received antiviral treatment over the past decade. The timing of starting antiviral treatment, regardless of whether it was before or after liver cancer happens, does not really matter in terms of survival benefits.

SUBMITTER: Hui VW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7530304 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Increasing antiviral treatment uptake improves survival in patients with HBV-related HCC.

Hui Vicki Wing-Ki VW Chan Stephen Lam SL Wong Vincent Wai-Sun VW Liang Lilian Yan LY Yip Terry Cheuk-Fung TC Lai Jimmy Che-To JC Yuen Becky Wing-Yan BW Luk Hester Wing-Sum HW Tse Yee-Kit YK Lee Hye-Won HW Chan Henry Lik-Yuen HL Wong Grace Lai-Hung GL

JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology 20200730 6

<h4>Background & aims</h4>Antiviral treatment is known to improve survival in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Yet, the treatment uptake in CHB patients remains low. We aimed to report the secular trend in antiviral treatment uptake from 2007-2017, and to compare the effect of different nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) initiation times (before <i>vs.</i> after HCC diagnosis) on survival.<h4>Methods</h4>A 3-month landmark analysis was used to compare over ...[more]

PMID: 33024950

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceTenofovir disoproxil and entecavir are both commonly used first-line antiviral treatments, but their comparative recurrence and overall survival (OS) benefits remain unclear.ObjectiveTo explore differences of tenofovir disoproxil vs entecavir in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and OS after liver resection with curative intent in patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC) related to hepatitis B virus (HBV).Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Shanghai, China, between January 4, 2015, and April 1, 2023. Participants included patients with HBV-related HCC who underwent liver resection with curative intent from January 2015 to December 2018. Patients who received tenofovir disoproxil were matched with patients who received entecavir in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. Data were analyzed from April 3 to May 31, 2023.ExposuresReceiving tenofovir disoproxil or entecavir as antiviral treatment for HBV.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary end points were RFS and OS rates.ResultsAmong 4451 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [10.0] years; 3764 male [84.6%]; median [range] follow-up, of 51 [3 to 91] months), 989 patients in each of the groups were selected in propensity score matching. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In propensity score-matched groups, OS rates were 92.2% at 1 year, 70.9% at 3 years, and 54.2% at 5 years in the entecavir group, compared with 90.9% at 1 year, 75.2% at 3 years, and 64.0% at 5 years in the tenofovir disoproxil group. RFS rates were 83.9% at 1 year, 50.0% at 3 years, and 43.3% at 5 years in the entecavir group, compared with 85.3% at 1 year, 55.6% at 3 years, and 51.4% at 5 years in the tenofovir disoproxil group. Patients in the tenofovir disoproxil group had better OS (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P = .004) and RFS rates (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.92; P = .001) compared with the entecavir group. Restricted mean survival time differences of entecavir vs tenofovir disoproxil groups were -0.05 (95% CI, -0.18 to 0.08) months at 1 year (P = .45), 0.20 (95% CI, -0.62 to 1.03) months at 3 years (P = .63), and 1.82 (95% CI, 0.14 to 3.51) months at 5 years (P = .03).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that in patients undergoing curative liver resection for HBV-related HCC, tenofovir disoproxil was associated with better long-term OS and RFS rates compared with entecavir, providing insights for antiviral treatment.

Project description:Background & aimsThere is controversy regarding the overall value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in patients with cirrhosis given the lack of data from randomized-controlled trials. To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies evaluating the benefits and harms of HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis.MethodsWe performed a search of the Medline and EMBASE databases and national meeting abstracts from January 2014 through July 2020 for studies reporting early-stage HCC detection, curative treatment receipt, or overall survival, stratified by HCC surveillance status, among patients with cirrhosis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and hazard ratios, according to HCC surveillance status, were calculated for each outcome using the DerSimonian and Laird method for random effects models.ResultsWe identified 59 studies including 145,396 patients with HCC, which was detected by surveillance in 41,052 (28.2%) cases. HCC surveillance was associated with improved early-stage detection (RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.73-1.98; I2 = 82%), curative treatment receipt (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.69-1.97; I2 = 75%), and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.61-0.72; I2 = 78%) after adjusting for lead-time bias; however, there was notable heterogeneity in all pooled estimates. Four studies examined surveillance-related physical harms due to false positive or indeterminate surveillance results, but no studies examined potential financial or psychological harms. The proportion of patients experiencing surveillance-related physical harms ranged from 8.8% to 27.5% across studies, although most harms were mild in severity.ConclusionHCC surveillance is associated with improved early detection, curative treatment receipt, and survival in patients with cirrhosis, although there was heterogeneity in pooled estimates. Available data suggest HCC surveillance is of high value in patients with cirrhosis, although continued rigorous studies evaluating benefits and harms are still needed.Lay summaryThere has been ongoing debate about the overall value of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in patients with cirrhosis given the lack of data from randomized-controlled trials. In a systematic review of contemporary cohort studies, we found that HCC screening is associated with improved early detection, curative treatment receipt, and survival in patients with cirrhosis, although there were fewer data quantifying potential screening-related harms. Available data suggest HCC screening is of high value in patients with cirrhosis, although continued studies evaluating benefits and harms are still needed.

Project description:BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most prominent risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and virus-mediated cases represents more than 80% of HCC in East Asia, where it is endemic. Currently, the HBV status of pathological HCC is not fully clarified, especially by comparison to nontumorous tissues. Lack of clinicopathological animal models of HCC impedes clinical application of antiviral treatment in the field.Materials and methodsA cohort sample of 14 HCC and corresponding stroma tissues were analyzed for pathological patterns of HBV antigens using immunohistochemistry; 10 fresh primary tumor tissues were inoculated into NOD/SCID mice and risk factors for patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model were identified by the univariate F test. Consistency of HBV features and cellular biomarkers between patient tissues and tumor grafts were examined.ResultsIn HCC, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) was mainly absent. Only 9.9% of samples showed HBsAg positivity in the tumor tissue that was limited to benign hepatocytes. In contrast, HBV core antigen (HBcAg) exhibited positive staining in all HCC tissues, located mainly in the cytoplasm of tumor cells. Of 14 HCC cases, three were diagnosed as occult infection of HBV based on HBcAg expression. The successful rate for the PDX model was 20% (2/10). Tumor lesions on hepatic lobes of V and VI, severe liver dysfunction and higher CA125 showed p-values of 0.01, 0.035, and 0.01, respectively. HBsAg absence in original tumors of #6 and 8 patients were faithfully reproduced by engraftments. Mixed distribution of HBcAg in cellular compartments of original tumor cells was also observed in mice. ki67 was dramatically increased in tumor grafts.ConclusionWe delineated pathological HBV profiles of HCC specimens and perilesional areas, which provided evidence for virus-based therapy in the future. PDX mice may phenocopy virological and cellular features of patient tissues, which is novel in the virus-related hepatocarcinogenesis field.

Project description:Background & aimsConflicting data exist regarding optimal prophylaxis for HBV recurrence (HBV-R) after liver transplantation (LT), particularly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We assessed current practices for HBV-R prophylaxis in Italy, evaluating rates, risk factors, and the clinical impact of HBV-R and HCC-R.MethodsWe performed a multicentric, retrospective study involving 20 Italian LT centers. All patients who underwent LT for HBV-related liver diseases between 2010 and 2021 were included. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of HBV-R and HCC-R. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.ResultsWe included 1,205 LT recipients (60.8% with HCC). HBV prophylaxis was prescribed in 99.7% of recipients, mostly with lifelong hepatitis B immunoglobulin+nucleos(t)ide analogues (HBIG+NUCs) (83.9%). Rates of HBV-R were 2.1% and 3.1% in patients transplanted without and with HCC, respectively. Median times from LT were 60 [9.5-77.5] and 5.5 [1-13] months, respectively. Recipients on lifelong HBIG+NUCs experienced lower rates of HBV-R than those in whom HBIG was withdrawn, used only during LT, or in those who received NUCs alone (2.3% vs. 6.2% vs. 1.9% vs. 8%, respectively; p = 0.042). In recipients with HCC, HCC-R rate was 10.8% (median time from LT: 18 months). At multivariate analysis, HBV-R (odds ratio [OR] 10.329; 95% CI 3.665-29.110), Child-Pugh C (OR 3.519; 95% CI 1.305-9.484), and microvascular invasion (OR 3.088; 95% CI 1.692-5.634) were independently associated with HCC-R. Five-year survival was lower in recipients who experienced HCC-R (32.5% vs. 92.4% in those who did not; p <0.001).ConclusionIn Italy, HBV prophylaxis is mostly based on lifelong HBIG+NUCs. HBV-R was rare and not associated with survival in patients transplanted for decompensated cirrhosis. In patients transplanted for HCC, HBV-R was independently associated with HCC-R. The clinical implications of these findings deserve further investigation.Impact and implicationsIn Italy, the combination of high-barrier nucleos(t)ide analogues and hepatitis B immunoglobulins remains the most widely used regimen for antiviral prophylaxis following liver transplantation for HBV-related liver disease. Hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation is a rare event and not associated with reduced survival. In transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma, HBV recurrence was independently associated with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, though this may simply reflect an epiphenomenon without any causal relationship.

Dataset Information

Increasing antiviral treatment uptake improves survival in patients with HBV-related HCC.

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Lay summary

Publications

Increasing antiviral treatment uptake improves survival in patients with HBV-related HCC.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets