Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for detecting pelvic fractures among blunt trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis


ABSTRACT: Background Pelvic fractures are common among blunt trauma patients, and timely and accurate diagnosis can improve patient outcomes. However, it remains unclear whether physical examinations are sufficient in this context. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of physical examination for pelvic fracture among blunt trauma patients. Methods Studies were identified using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases starting from the creation of the database to January 2020. A total of 20 studies (49,043 patients with 8300 cases [16.9%] of pelvic fracture) were included in the quality assessment and meta-analysis. Two investigators extracted the data and evaluated the risk of bias in each study. The meta-analysis involved a hierarchical summary receiver operating curve (ROC) model to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of the physical exam. Subgroup analysis assessed the extent of between-study heterogeneity. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis. Results The median prevalence of pelvic fracture was 10.5% (interquartile range, 5.1–16.5). The pooled sensitivity (and corresponding 95% confidence interval) of the hierarchical summary ROC parameters was 0.859 (0.761–0.952) at a given specificity of 0.920, which was the median value among the included studies. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled sensitivity among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score ??13 was 0.933 (0.847–0.998) at a given specificity of 0.920. The corresponding value for patients with scores ??13 was 0.761 (0.560–0.932). For threshold probability

SUBMITTER: Okada Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7531119 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6369004 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10225099 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7869209 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8502256 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7808510 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5522794 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5551004 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5493732 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7599368 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5667265 | biostudies-literature