Dataset Information

Recurrence, death, and secondary malignancy after ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To examine the association between ovarian conservation and oncologic outcome in surgically-treated young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study examined women aged <50 with stage I grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery with hysterectomy from 2000 to 2014 (US cohort n = 1196, and Japan cohort n = 495). Recurrence patterns, survival, and the presence of a metachronous secondary malignancy were assessed based on ovarian conservation versus oophorectomy.

Results

During the study period, the ovarian conservation rate significantly increased in the US cohort from 5.4% to 16.4% (P = 0.020) whereas the rate was unchanged in the Japan cohort (6.3-8.7%, P = 0.787). In the US cohort, ovarian conservation was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.829, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.188-3.663, P = 0.805), overall survival (HR not estimated, P = 0.981), or metachronous secondary malignancy (HR 1.787, 95% CI 0.603-5.295, P = 0.295). In the Japan cohort, ovarian conservation was associated with decreased disease-free survival (HR 5.214, 95% CI 1.557-17.464, P = 0.007) and an increased risk of a metachronous secondary malignancy, particularly ovarian cancer (HR 7.119, 95% CI 1.349-37.554, P = 0.021), but was not associated with overall survival (HR not estimated, P = 0.987). Ovarian recurrence or metachronous secondary ovarian cancer occurred after a median time of 5.9 years, and all cases were salvaged.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that adoption of ovarian conservation in young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer varies by population. Ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer may be potentially associated with increased risks of ovarian recurrence or metachronous secondary ovarian cancer in certain populations; nevertheless, ovarian conservation did not negatively impact overall survival.

SUBMITTER: Matsuo K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7537353 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Recurrence, death, and secondary malignancy after ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer.

Matsuo Koji K Cripe James C JC Kurnit Katherine C KC Kaneda Michiko M Garneau Audrey S AS Glaser Gretchen E GE Nizam Aaron A Schillinger Rachel M RM Kuznicki Michelle L ML Yabuno Akira A Yanai Shiori S Garofalo Denise M DM Suzuki Jiro J St Laurent Jessica D JD Yen Ting-Tai TT Liu Annie Y AY Shida Masako M Kakuda Mamoru M Oishi Tetsuro T Nishio Shin S Marcus Jenna Z JZ Adachi Sosuke S Kurokawa Tetsuji T Ross Malcolm S MS Horowitz Max P MP Johnson Marian S MS Kim Min K MK Melamed Alexander A Machado Karime K KK Yoshihara Kosuke K Yoshida Yoshio Y Enomoto Takayuki T Ushijima Kimio K Satoh Shinya S Ueda Yutaka Y Mikami Mikio M Rimel Bobbie J BJ Stone Rebecca L RL Growdon Whitfield B WB Okamoto Aikou A Guntupalli Saketh R SR Hasegawa Kosei K Shahzad Mian M K MMK Im Dwight D DD Frimer Marina M Gostout Bobbie S BS Ueland Frederick R FR Nagao Shoji S Soliman Pamela T PT Thaker Premal H PH Wright Jason D JD Roman Lynda D LD

Gynecologic oncology 20190816 1

<h4>Objective</h4>To examine the association between ovarian conservation and oncologic outcome in surgically-treated young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer.<h4>Methods</h4>This multicenter retrospective study examined women aged <50 with stage I grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery with hysterectomy from 2000 to 2014 (US cohort n = 1196, and Japan cohort n = 495). Recurrence patterns, survival, and the presence of a metachronous secondary m ...[more]

PMID: 31427143

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo characterize contributing factors for ovarian conservation during surgical treatment for endometrial cancer and to examine the association of ovarian conservation on survival of young women with early-stage, low-grade tumors.MethodsThis was a population-based study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program to identify surgically treated stage I type I (grade 1-2 endometrioid histology) endometrial cancer cases diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 (N=86,005). Multivariable models were used to identify independent factors for ovarian conservation. Survival outcomes and cause of death were examined for women aged younger than 50 with stage I type I endometrial cancer who underwent ovarian conservation (1,242 among 12,860 women [9.7%]).ResultsOn multivariable analysis, age younger than 50 years, grade 1 endometrioid histology, and tumor size 2.0 cm or less were noted to be independent factors for ovarian conservation (all, P<.001). For 9,110 women aged younger than 50 years with stage I grade 1 tumors, cause-specific survival was similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy cases (20-year rates 98.9% compared with 97.7%, P=.31), whereas overall survival was significantly higher in ovarian conservation cases than oophorectomy cases (88.8% compared with 82.0%, P=.011). On multivariable analysis, ovarian conservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.98, P=.036) and was independently associated with a lower cumulative risk of death resulting from cardiovascular disease compared with oophorectomy (20-year rates, 2.3% compared with 3.7%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.91, P=.029). Contrary, cause-specific survival (20-year rates 94.6% compared with 96.1%, P=.68) and overall survival (81.0% compared with 80.6%, P=.91) were similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy among 3,750 women aged younger than 50 years with stage I grade 2 tumors.ConclusionOvarian conservation is performed in less than 10% of young women with stage I type I endometrial cancer. Ovarian conservation is associated with decreased mortality in young women with stage I grade 1 tumors.

Project description:BackgroundWhile there is an increasing trend of ovarian conservation at the time of surgical treatment for young women with stage I cervical cancer, the risk for subsequent ovarian cancer after ovarian conservation has not been well studied.ObjectiveWe sought to examine the incidence of and risk factors for metachronous ovarian cancer among young women with stage I cervical cancer who had ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy.Study designThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was used to identify women aged <50 years who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation for stage I cervical cancer from 1983 through 2013 (n = 4365). Time-dependent analysis was performed for ovarian cancer risk after cervical cancer diagnosis.ResultsMean age at cervical cancer diagnosis was 37 years, and the majority of patients had stage IA disease (68.2%) and squamous histology (72.9%). Median follow-up time was 10.8 years, and there were 13 women who developed metachronous ovarian cancer. The 10- and 20-year cumulative incidences of metachronous ovarian cancer were 0.2% (95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.4) and 0.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8), respectively. Mean age at the time of diagnosis of metachronous ovarian cancer was 47.5 years, and stage III-IV disease was seen in 55.6%. Age (≥45 vs <45 years, hazard ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-15.4; P = .018), ethnicity (non-white vs white, hazard ratio, 4.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-14.0; P = .009), cervical cancer histology (adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous vs squamous, hazard ratio, 3.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-10.5; P = .028), and adjuvant radiotherapy use (yes vs no, hazard ratio, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-13.4; P = .034) were significantly associated with metachronous ovarian cancer risk. The presence of multiple risk factors was associated with a significantly increased risk of metachronous ovarian cancer compared to the no risk factor group: 1 risk factor (hazard ratio range, 2.96-8.43), 2 risk factors (hazard ratio range, 16.6-31.0), and 3-4 risk factors (hazard ratio range, 62.3-109), respectively.ConclusionMetachronous ovarian cancer risk after ovarian conservation for women with stage I cervical cancer is <1%. Older age, non-white ethnicity, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous histology, and adjuvant radiotherapy may be associated with an increased metachronous ovarian cancer risk.

Project description:ObjectiveTo identify predictors of ovarian conservation at hysterectomy and to examine the association of ovarian conservation and survival of young women with early-stage cervical cancer.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to identify hysterectomy-based surgically treated patients with stage I cervical cancer diagnosed between 1983 and 2012 (N=16,511). Multivariable models were used to identify independent factors associated with ovarian conservation. Among the subgroup of 9,419 women younger than 50 years of age with stage I disease, survival outcomes and causes of death were examined for 3,908 (41.5%) women who underwent ovarian conservation at hysterectomy without radiotherapy.ResultsOn multivariable analysis, age younger than 50 years, stage IA disease, and squamous histology were independent factors associated with ovarian conservation (all, P<.001). Among 5,526 women younger than 50 years of age with stage IA disease who underwent hysterectomy without radiotherapy, overall survival was significantly higher in patients undergoing ovarian conservation than in those undergoing oophorectomy (20-year rate, 93.5% compared with 86.8%, P<.001); cervical cancer-specific survival was similar between the patients who underwent ovarian conservation and those who underwent oophorectomy (98.8% compared with 97.8%, P=.12). On multivariable analysis, ovarian conservation remained an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.82, P=.001) and was independently associated with lower cumulative risks of death resulting from cardiovascular disease (20-year cumulative rate, 1.2% compared with 3.3%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.86, P=.014) and other chronic disease (0.5% compared with 1.4%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.65, P=.005) compared with oophorectomy. Both cervical cancer-specific survival (20-year rate, 93.1% compared with 92.0%, P=.37) and overall survival (86.7% compared with 84.6%, P=.12) were similar between ovarian conservation and oophorectomy among 3,893 women younger than 50 years of age with stage IB disease who underwent hysterectomy without radiotherapy.ConclusionAmong young women with stage IA cervical cancer, ovarian conservation at hysterectomy is associated with decreased all-cause mortality including death resulting from cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases.

Project description:ObjectiveTo profile patient characteristics associated with and outcomes of ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy in young women with minimal-risk endometrial cancer.MethodsA population-based retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2007 and 2015 was performed. Women aged <50 with minimal-risk endometrial cancer who had ovarian conservation (n = 2314) were compared to those who had oophorectomy (n = 8191). A classification-tree model with recursive partitioning analysis was constructed to examine patterns of ovarian conservation. Propensity score matching was performed and length of stay and perioperative complications were compared. Two validation cohorts were also analyzed in a similar fashion (benign gynecologic disease and cervical cancer).ResultsThere were nine distinct patterns of patient characteristics identified, and ovarian conservation rates ranged from 11.7% (women aged 40-49 who underwent abdominal hysterectomy at an urban teaching hospital) to 60.5% (non-obese women aged <40 with median household income ≥$63,000) (absolute difference, 48.8%, 95% confidence interval 39.9-57.7; P < 0.001). After propensity score matching, ovarian conservation was significantly associated with a decreased likelihood of hospitalization >2 days (relative risk reduction, 16.7%, P < 0.001). Rates of surgical complications were not different between the two groups (8.2% versus 8.3%, P = 0.91). In the benign gynecologic disease and cervical cancer cohorts, ovarian conservation was also associated with decreased length of hospitalization (all, P < 0.05).ConclusionThere is substantial variability in the utilization of ovarian conservation in young women with minimal-risk endometrial cancer based on patient, surgical, and hospital factors. Our study suggests that guidelines for ovarian conservation in this population would be helpful for improving patient selection and rates of ovarian conservation.

Project description:Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare and indolent malignancy. Hormone therapy has been reported as an adjuvant treatment for LG-ESS, although its effectiveness is controversial. Here we aimed to investigate the effects of postoperative hormone therapy on recurrence in patients with uterine LG-ESS. Between January 2010 and December 2019, a total of 152 patients (23 with and 129 without fertility-sparing) with a diagnosis of primary uterine LG-ESS confirmed by pathologists were enrolled in this study. In the cohort without fertility-sparing, 22 (17.7%) patients had recurrence, and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 47 (2-130) months; only one of these patients died of LG-ESS. No significant difference was found in recurrence between the groups with and without hormone therapy (p=0.802). However, subgroup analysis showed that hormone therapy decreased the recurrence rate in stage II-IV (p=0.001, HR 0.144, 95% CI: 0.038-0.548), but not in stage I disease (p=0.256). High-dose progestins notably reduced recurrence (p=0.012, HR 0.154, 95% CI: 0.036-0.660), whereas non-progestin therapy marginally influenced recurrence (p=0.054) compared with no hormone therapy in stage II-IV disease. Moreover, hormone therapy within 12 months was effective in reducing recurrence (p=0.038, HR 0.241, 95% CI: 0.063-0.922). Ovarian preservation (p=0.004, HR 6.250, 95% CI: 1.786-21.874) and negative expression of ER/PR (p=0.000, HR 23.249, 95% CI: 4.912-110.026) were high-risk factors for recurrence in patients without fertility-sparing. In the fertility-sparing cohort, 15 (65.2%) patients experienced recurrence, and the median DFS was 24 (3-107) months. Six patients successfully delivered healthy fetuses, and five received hormone therapy. Twelve patients finally accepted hysterectomy after repeated recurrence, and only two of them had given birth before surgery. Patients who received hormone therapy showed longer DFS, although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.466). In conclusion, postoperative hormone therapy reduces recurrence in patients with stage II-IV uterine LG-ESS without fertility-sparing, and high-dose treatment with progestins within 12 months is recommended. Bilateral oophorectomy can also reduce the risk of recurrence. Patients with fertility-sparing have a high risk of recurrence and poor pregnancy outcomes, and hormone therapy may be a reasonable choice in postoperative management.

Dataset Information

Recurrence, death, and secondary malignancy after ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Recurrence, death, and secondary malignancy after ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets