Dataset Information

Chamomile Gel versus Urea Cream to Prevent Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Results from a Preliminary Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT: We assessed safety and potential efficacy of a chamomile gel compared with urea cream to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients. We assessed safety and potential efficacy of the chamomile gel in escalating concentrations of 2.50%, 5.00% and 8.35% of chamomile. Concentration of 8.35% was chosen for a randomized trial comparing chamomile gel (8.35%) with urea cream (n?=?24?per group), for potential efficacy to delay or prevent radiation dermatitis in these patients. Preliminary results demonstrate a delayed onset of dermatitis, with onset of Grade 2 dermatitis at 5.1 (1.3) weeks in the chamomile group and 4.5 (1.3) weeks in the urea group (effect size of 0.46). Itching, burning and hyperpigmentation were more frequently reported in the urea group. Results indicates a potential efficacy of the chamomile gel. Further studies are needed to confirm the effect of the chamomile gel in reducing or delaying the occurrence of radiation dermatitis.

SUBMITTER: Ferreira EB

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7545760 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Chamomile Gel versus Urea Cream to Prevent Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Results from a Preliminary Clinical Trial.

Ferreira Elaine B EB Ciol Marcia A MA de Meneses Amanda G AG Bontempo Priscila de S M PSM Hoffman Jeanne M JM Reis Paula E D Dos PEDD

Integrative cancer therapies 20200101

We assessed safety and potential efficacy of a chamomile gel compared with urea cream to prevent acute radiation dermatitis in head and neck cancer patients. We assessed safety and potential efficacy of the chamomile gel in escalating concentrations of 2.50%, 5.00% and 8.35% of chamomile. Concentration of 8.35% was chosen for a randomized trial comparing chamomile gel (8.35%) with urea cream (n = 24 per group), for potential efficacy to delay or prevent radiation dermatitis in these patients. Pr ...[more]

PMID: 32985288

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDermatitis is a skin condition caused by multiple causes, including radiotherapy treatment. Pharmacological treatments can become chronic and are not exempt from side effects. The latest recommendations of the American Academy of Dermatology establish the use of natural, nourishing, and moisturizing cosmetic products as prevention and the first therapeutic step for dermatitis. Alantel® is a cream developed to reduce redness and irritation, promote the local immune system, combat immunosenescence, and promote the healing of epidermal lesions. The objective was to evaluate the effect of a cream (Alantel) based on natural products at high concentrations for the preventive and curative treatment (at early stages) of radiation-induced dermatitis in patients with breast cancer.MethodsOur protocol is an experimental, prospective, triple-blind, multicenter, controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms. The experimental group will be treated with Alantel, while the control group will receive another moisturizing cream. Radiotherapy oncology professionals will recruit a total of 88 patients (44 per comparison group) with breast cancer who will receive radiotherapy oncology treatment for 15 days, and they will be randomly allocated to the experimental or control group. Selected patients will be followed up for four visits by primary care physicians for up to 1 week after completion of radiotherapy. The main study variable will be the incidence rate of mild post-radiation dermatitis. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed, applying a comparison test for independent means and proportions. A bivariate and multivariate analysis will also be developed to check the treatment effect, adjusting for predictive sociodemographic and clinical variables.DiscussionBy carrying out this clinical trial, it is expected to verify that Alantel cream, based on natural products at high concentrations, has advantages over a moisturizing cream for the preventive and curative treatment of RD in patients with breast cancer. The COVID-19 pandemic has been influenced by delaying the start of the study. One of the main limitations of this study will be the time required to recruit the patients from the planned sample, given that the selection criteria are restrictive and, although the study is multicenter, recruitment will be coordinated through a single service on radiotherapy oncology.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04116151 . Registered on 4 October 2019.

Project description:Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer and often, despite advances in fractionated dosing schedules, produces undesirable skin toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using a keratin-based topical cream, KeraStat® Cream (KC; KeraNetics, Inc., Winston Salem, NC, USA) to manage the symptoms of radiation dermatitis (RD) in breast cancer patients undergoing RT. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 subjects were enrolled on this single-center, randomized, open-label study. Participants were randomly assigned to KC or standard of care (SOC, patient's choice of a variety of readily available creams or moisturizers). Patients were asked to apply the assigned treatment to the irradiated area twice daily, beginning with day 1 of RT, through 30 days post-RT. The primary outcome was compliance of use. Secondary outcomes included safety and tolerability of KC, as well as RD severity assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale and the patient-reported Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results: All subjects in the KC group were assessed as compliant with no adverse events. The rate of RTOG Grade 2 RD was lower in the KC group (30.8%) compared to the SOC group (54.5%, P = .408). At the final RT visit, the mean RTOG RD score was lower in the KC group (1.0) versus the SOC group (1.4). Similarly, patient-reported quality of life measured by the DLQI at the end of RT was improved in the KC group (mean 4.25, small effect) versus the SOC group (mean 6.18, moderate effect, P = .412). Conclusions: KC was safe and well tolerated with no adverse events. Though efficacy measures were not powered to draw definitive conclusions, trends and clinical assessments suggest that there is a benefit of using KC compared to SOC for breast cancer patients treated with RT, and a larger powered study for efficacy is warranted. Trial Registry: This clinical trial is registered as NCT03374995 titled KeraStat(R) Cream for Radiation Dermatitis.

Project description:ImportanceThe role of surveillance imaging after treatment for head and neck cancer is controversial and evidence to support decision-making is limited.ObjectiveTo determine the use of surveillance imaging in asymptomatic patients with head and neck cancer in remission after completion of chemoradiation.Design, setting, and participantsThis was a retrospective, comparative effectiveness research review of adult patients who had achieved a complete metabolic response to initial treatment for head and neck cancer as defined by having an unequivocally negative positron emission tomography (PET) scan using the PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) scale within the first 6 months of completing therapy. The medical records of 501 consecutive patients who completed definitive radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) for newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck between January 2014 and June 2022 were reviewed.ExposureSurveillance imaging was defined as the acquisition of a PET with computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or CT of the head and neck region in the absence of any clinically suspicious symptoms and/or examination findings. For remaining patients, subsequent surveillance after the achievement of a complete metabolic response to initial therapy was performed on an observational basis in the setting of routine follow-up using history-taking and physical examination, including endoscopy. This expectant approach led to imaging only in the presence of clinically suspicious symptoms and/or physical examination findings.Main outcome and measuresLocal-regional control, overall survival, and progression-free survival based on assignment to either the surveillance imaging or expectant management cohort.ResultsThis study included 340 patients (mean [SD] age, 59 [10] years; 201 males [59%]; 88 Latino patients [26%]; 145 White patients [43%]) who achieved a complete metabolic response during this period. There was no difference in 3-year local-regional control, overall survival, progression-free survival, or freedom from distant metastasis between patients treated with surveillance imaging vs those treated expectantly.Conclusions and relevanceIn this comparative effectiveness research, imaging-based surveillance failed to improve outcomes compared with expectant management for patients who were seemingly in remission after completion of primary radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Dataset Information

Chamomile Gel versus Urea Cream to Prevent Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Results from a Preliminary Clinical Trial.

Publications

Chamomile Gel versus Urea Cream to Prevent Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Results from a Preliminary Clinical Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets