Dataset Information

Real-world use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in Germany.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Bisphosphonates and denosumab prevent bone complications in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours. This retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study provides data on their real-world use in this setting in Germany. METHODS:Adults with bone metastases from breast, prostate or lung cancer who were newly initiated on a bisphosphonate or denosumab between 1 July 2011 and 31 December 2015 were identified from a German healthcare insurance claims database. Primary outcomes included persistence, compliance, discontinuation and switch rates at 12 months. RESULTS:This study included 1130 patients with bone metastases: 555 (49%) had breast cancer, 361 (32%) prostate cancer and 242 (21%) lung cancer. Mean age was 65 years for patients with breast or lung cancer and 74 years for those with prostate cancer. Across all tumour types, compared with any bisphosphonate, 12-month persistence was higher with denosumab (breast cancer 78% vs 54-58%, prostate cancer 58% vs 50%, lung cancer 68% vs 34-60%), median time to discontinuation was longer with denosumab and switch rates were lower for denosumab (breast cancer 5% vs 14-19%, prostate cancer 2% vs 11%, lung cancer 3% vs 7-12%). Compliance at 12 months was longer for denosumab than for any bisphosphonate in breast cancer (75% vs 42-48%) and in prostate cancer (47% vs 36%). CONCLUSIONS:Patients initiated on denosumab following a diagnosis of bone metastases from breast, prostate or lung cancer had greater medication persistence, longer time to discontinuation, improved compliance and lower switch rates than those initiated on a bisphosphonate.

SUBMITTER: Diel I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7547046 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Real-world use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in Germany.

Diel Ingo I Ansorge Sonja S Hohmann David D Giannopoulou Christina C Niepel Daniela D Intorcia Michele M

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 20200221 11

<h4>Purpose</h4>Bisphosphonates and denosumab prevent bone complications in patients with bone metastases from solid tumours. This retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study provides data on their real-world use in this setting in Germany.<h4>Methods</h4>Adults with bone metastases from breast, prostate or lung cancer who were newly initiated on a bisphosphonate or denosumab between 1 July 2011 and 31 December 2015 were identified from a German healthcare insurance claims database. Primary outcom ...[more]

PMID: 32086567

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundClinical practice guidelines recommend the use of bone-targeting agents for preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. The anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody denosumab is approved for the prevention of SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. However, real-world data are lacking on the impact of individual risk factors for SREs, specifically in the context of denosumab discontinuation.PurposeWe aim to identify risk factors associated with SRE incidence following denosumab discontinuation using a machine learning approach to help profile patients at a higher risk of developing SREs following discontinuation of denosumab treatment.MethodsUsing the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record repository, patients diagnosed with incident bone metastases from primary solid tumors between January 1, 2007, and September 1, 2019, were evaluated for inclusion in the study. Eligible patients received ≥ 2 consecutive 120 mg denosumab doses on a 4-week (± 14 days) schedule with a minimum follow-up of ≥ 1 year after the last denosumab dose, or an SRE occurring between days 84 and 365 after denosumab discontinuation. Extreme gradient boosting was used to develop an SRE risk prediction model evaluated on a test dataset. Multiple variables associated with patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory values, treatments, and denosumab exposures were examined as potential factors for SRE risk using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP). Univariate analyses on risk factors with the highest importance from pooled and tumor-specific models were also conducted.ResultsA total of 1,414 adult cancer patients (breast: 40%, prostate: 30%, lung: 13%, other: 17%) were eligible, of whom 1,133 (80%) were assigned to model training and 281 (20%) to model evaluation. The median age at inclusion was 67 (range, 19-89) years with a median duration of denosumab treatment of 253 (range, 88-2,726) days; 490 (35%) patients experienced ≥ 1 SRE 83 days after denosumab discontinuation. Meaningful model performance was evaluated by an area under the receiver operating curve score of 77% and an F1 score of 62%; model precision was 60%, with 63% sensitivity and 78% specificity. SHAP identified several significant factors for the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models that predicted an increased SRE risk following denosumab discontinuation, including prior SREs, shorter denosumab treatment duration, ≥ 4 clinic visits per month with at least one hospitalization (all-cause) event from the baseline period up to discontinuation of denosumab, younger age at bone metastasis, shorter time to denosumab initiation from bone metastasis, and prostate cancer.ConclusionThis analysis showed a higher cumulative number of SREs, prior SREs relative to denosumab initiation, a higher number of hospital visits, and a shorter denosumab treatment duration as significant factors that are associated with an increased SRE risk after discontinuation of denosumab, in both the tumor-agnostic and tumor-specific models. Our machine learning approach to SRE risk factor identification reinforces treatment guidance on the persistent use of denosumab and has the potential to help clinicians better assess a patient's need to continue denosumab treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundLittle is known on how denosumab reduces skeletal-related events (SREs) by bone metastases from solid tumors. We sought to evaluate the effect of denosumab administration in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.MethodsData of patients treated with denosumab were collected from electronic medical charts (n = 496). Eligible participants in this study were adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with metastatic bone lesions from solid tumors treated with denosumab. SREs, surgical interventions, the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) for spinal region, and Mirels' score for the appendicular region were evaluated. To assess whether denosumab could prevent SREs and associated surgery, the SINS and Mirels' score were compared between patients with and without SREs.ResultsA total of 247 patients (median age, 65.5 years old; median follow-up period, 13 months) treated with denosumab for metastatic bone lesions from solid tumors were enrolled in this study. SREs occurred in 19 patients (7.7%). SREs occurred in 2 patients (0.8%) who took denosumab administration before SREs. Surgical interventions were undertaken in 14 patients (5.7%) (spinal and intradural lesions in five patients and appendicular lesions in nine patients). The mean SINS of patients without SREs compared to those with SREs were 7.5 points and 10.2 points, respectively. The mean Mirels' scores of non-SREs patients and those with SREs were 8.07 points and 10.7 points, respectively. Patients with SREs had significantly higher Mirels' score than non-SREs patients (p < 0.01). Patients with SREs had higher SINS than non-SREs patients (p = 0.09).ConclusionsSREs occurred in patients with higher SINS or Mirels' scores. Two patients suffered from SREs though they took denosumab administration before SREs. Appropriate management of denosumab for patients with bone metastasis is significant. Surgical interventions may be needed for patients who with higher SINS or Mirel's scores.

Project description:BackgroundDenosumab has been approved for the treatment of bone metastases from solid tumors. QL1206 is the first denosumab biosimilar and needs to be compared with denosumab in a phase III trial.ObjectiveThis phase III trial aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics between QL1206 and denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was conducted in 51 centers in China. Patients aged 18-80 years, with solid tumors and bone metastases, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. This study was divided into a 13-week double-blind period, a 40-week open-label period, and a 20-week safety follow-up period. In the double-blind period, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive three doses of QL1206 or denosumab (120 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks, each). Randomization was stratified by tumor types, previous skeletal-related events, and current systemic anti-tumor therapy. In the open-label period, up to ten doses of QL1206 could be given in both groups. The primary endpoint was percentage change in urinary N-telopeptide/creatinine ratio (uNTX/uCr) from baseline to Week 13. Equivalence margins were ± 0.135. Secondary endpoints included percentage change in uNTX/uCr at Week 25 and 53, percentage change in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at Week 13, 25, and 53, and time to on-study skeletal-related events. The safety profile was evaluated based on adverse events and immunogenicity.ResultsFrom September 2019 to January 2021, in the full analysis set, 717 patients were randomly assigned to receive QL1206 (n = 357) or denosumab (n = 360). Median percentage changes in uNTX/uCr at Week 13 in two groups were - 75.2% and - 75.8%, respectively. Least-squares mean difference in the natural log-transformed ratio of uNTX/uCr at Week 13 to baseline between the two groups was 0.012 (90% confidence interval - 0.078 to 0.103), within the equivalence margins. There were no differences in the secondary endpoints between the two groups (all p > 0.05). Adverse events, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics were similar in the two groups.ConclusionsDenosumab biosimilar QL1206 had promising efficacy, tolerable safety, and pharmacokinetics equivalent to denosumab and could benefit patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04550949, retrospectively registered on 16 September, 2020.

Project description:Introduction: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a state of accelerated tumor growth from cancer immunotherapy, associated with poor outcome. The reported incidence is 6% to 29% among studies using varying definitions of HPD, with no predictive biomarkers. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic and predictive for immunotherapy benefit in various tumor types, but have only been tested for correlation with HPD in one study. Objectives: The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of HPD in solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a real-world setting, and to assess clinicopathological features as potential biomarkers for HPD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at a single institution. Imaging pre-immunotherapy and postimmunotherapy were assessed for HPD, and correlated against clinicopathological factors, including TILs and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status through archival tumor assessment. HPD was defined per Matos et al as response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) progressive disease, minimum increase in measurable lesions of 10 mm, plus increase of ≥40% in sum of target lesions compared with baseline and/or increase of ≥20% in sum of target lesions compared with baseline plus new lesions in at least 2 different organs. Results: HPD occurred in 11 of 87 patients (13%), and associated with inferior overall survival (median 5.5 months vs 18.3 months, P = .002). However, on multivariate analysis, only liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 4.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-9.56, P < .001) and PD-L1 status (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.95, P = .03) were significantly associated with survival. Presence of liver metastases correlated with occurence of HPD (P = .01). Age, sex, and monotherapy versus combination immunotherapy were not predictive for HPD. PD-L1 status and TILs were not associated with HPD. Conclusions: We found 13% HPD among solid tumor patients treated with immunotherapy, consistent with the range reported in prior series. Assessment for HPD is feasible outside of a clinical trials setting, using modified criteria that require comparison of 2 imaging studies. Liver metastases were associated with risk of HPD, while TILs and PD-L1 status were not predictive for HPD.

Dataset Information

Real-world use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in Germany.

Publications

Real-world use of denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in Germany.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets