Dataset Information

Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Thermal Evaluation of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Flow in Shunt Malfunction: A Prospective, Multi-Site, Operator-Blinded Study.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Thermal flow evaluation (TFE) is a non-invasive method to assess ventriculoperitoneal shunt function. Flow detected by TFE is a negative predictor of the need for revision surgery. Further optimization of testing protocols, evaluation in multiple centers, and integration with clinical and imaging impressions prompted the current study. OBJECTIVE:To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2 TFE protocols, with micropumper (TFE+MP) or without (TFE-only), to neuro-imaging in patients emergently presenting with symptoms concerning for shunt malfunction. METHODS:We performed a prospective multicenter operator-blinded trial of a consecutive series of patients who underwent evaluation for shunt malfunction. TFE was performed, and preimaging clinician impressions and imaging results were recorded. The primary outcome was shunt obstruction requiring neurosurgical revision within 7 d. Non-inferiority of the sensitivity of TFE vs neuro-imaging for detecting shunt obstruction was tested using a prospectively determined a priori margin of -2.5%. RESULTS:We enrolled 406 patients at 10 centers. Of these, 68/348 (20%) evaluated with TFE+MP and 30/215 (14%) with TFE-only had shunt obstruction. The sensitivity for detecting obstruction was 100% (95% CI: 88%-100%) for TFE-only, 90% (95% CI: 80%-96%) for TFE+MP, 76% (95% CI: 65%-86%) for imaging in TFE+MP cohort, and 77% (95% CI: 58%-90%) for imaging in the TFE-only cohort. Difference in sensitivities between TFE methods and imaging did not exceed the non-inferiority margin. CONCLUSION:TFE is non-inferior to imaging in ruling out shunt malfunction and may help avoid imaging and other steps. For this purpose, TFE only is favored over TFE+MP.

SUBMITTER: Madsen JR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7566379 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Thermal Evaluation of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Flow in Shunt Malfunction: A Prospective, Multi-Site, Operator-Blinded Study.

Madsen Joseph R JR Boyle Tehnaz P TP Neuman Mark I MI Park Eun-Hyoung EH Tamber Mandeep S MS Hickey Robert W RW Heuer Gregory G GG Zorc Joseph J JJ Leonard Jeffrey R JR Leonard Julie C JC Keating Robert R Chamberlain James M JM Frim David M DM Zakrzewski Paula P Klinge Petra P Merck Lisa H LH Piatt Joseph J Bennett Jonathan E JE Sandberg David I DI Boop Frederick A FA Hameed Mustafa Q MQ

Neurosurgery 20201001 5

<h4>Background</h4>Thermal flow evaluation (TFE) is a non-invasive method to assess ventriculoperitoneal shunt function. Flow detected by TFE is a negative predictor of the need for revision surgery. Further optimization of testing protocols, evaluation in multiple centers, and integration with clinical and imaging impressions prompted the current study.<h4>Objective</h4>To compare the diagnostic accuracy of 2 TFE protocols, with micropumper (TFE+MP) or without (TFE-only), to neuro-imaging in pa ...[more]

PMID: 32459841

Similar Datasets

Project description:Treatment for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) continues to develop. Although ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery has a long history and is one of the most established neurosurgeries, in the 1970s, the improvement rate of iNPH triad symptoms was poor and the risks related to shunt implantation were high. This led experts to question the surgical indication for iNPH and, over the next 20 years, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt surgery for iNPH fell out of favor and was rarely performed. However, the development of programmable-pressure shunt valve devices has reduced the major complications associated with the CSF drainage volume and appears to have increased shunt effectiveness. In addition, the development of support devices for the placement of ventricular catheters including preoperative virtual simulation and navigation systems has increased the certainty of ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Secure shunt implantation is the most important prognostic indicator, but ensuring optimal initial valve pressure is also important. Since over-drainage is most likely to occur in the month after shunting, it is generally believed that a high initial setting of shunt valve pressure is the safest option. However, this does not always result in sufficient improvement of the symptoms in the early period after shunting. In fact, evidence suggests that setting the optimal valve pressure early after shunting may cause symptoms to improve earlier. This leads to improved quality of life and better long-term independent living expectations. However, in iNPH patients, the remaining symptoms may worsen again after several years, even when there is initial improvement due to setting the optimal valve pressure early after shunting. Because of the possibility of insufficient CSF drainage, the valve pressure should be reduced by one step (2-4 cmH2O) after 6 months to a year after shunting to maximize symptom improvement. After the valve pressure is reduced, a head CT scan is advised a month later.

Dataset Information

Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Thermal Evaluation of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Flow in Shunt Malfunction: A Prospective, Multi-Site, Operator-Blinded Study.

Publications

Diagnostic Accuracy of Non-Invasive Thermal Evaluation of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Flow in Shunt Malfunction: A Prospective, Multi-Site, Operator-Blinded Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets