Dataset Information

Identification of key genes unique to the luminal a and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Breast cancer subtypes are statistically associated with prognosis. The search for markers of breast tumor heterogeneity and the development of precision medicine for patients are the current focuses of the field. METHODS:We used a bioinformatic approach to identify key disease-causing genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. First, we retrieved gene expression data for luminal A breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, and normal breast tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The differentially expressed genes unique to the 2 breast cancer subtypes were identified and subjected to Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analyses. We constructed protein-protein interaction networks of the differentially expressed genes. Finally, we analyzed the key modules of the networks, which we combined with survival data to identify the unique cancer genes associated with each breast cancer subtype. RESULTS:We identified 1114 differentially expressed genes in luminal A breast cancer and 1042 differentially expressed genes in basal-like breast cancer, of which the subtypes shared 500. We observed 614 and 542 differentially expressed genes unique to luminal A and basal-like breast cancer, respectively. Through enrichment analyses, protein-protein interaction network analysis, and module mining, we identified 8 key differentially expressed genes unique to each subtype. Analysis of the gene expression data in the context of the survival data revealed that high expression of NMUR1 and NCAM1 in luminal A breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis, whereas the low expression levels of CDC7, KIF18A, STIL, and CKS2 in basal-like breast cancer statistically correlated with poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS:NMUR1 and NCAM1 are novel key disease-causing genes for luminal A breast cancer, and STIL is a novel key disease-causing gene for basal-like breast cancer. These genes are potential targets for clinical treatment.

SUBMITTER: Jia R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7568373 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Identification of key genes unique to the luminal a and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis.

Jia Rong R Li Zhongxian Z Liang Wei W Ji Yucheng Y Weng Yujie Y Liang Ying Y Ning Pengfei P

World journal of surgical oncology 20201016 1

<h4>Background</h4>Breast cancer subtypes are statistically associated with prognosis. The search for markers of breast tumor heterogeneity and the development of precision medicine for patients are the current focuses of the field.<h4>Methods</h4>We used a bioinformatic approach to identify key disease-causing genes unique to the luminal A and basal-like subtypes of breast cancer. First, we retrieved gene expression data for luminal A breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, and normal breast t ...[more]

PMID: 33066779

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: The molecular mechanism of tumorigenesis remains to be fully understood in breast cancer. It is urgently required to identify genes that are associated with breast cancer development and prognosis and to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms. In the present study, we aimed to identify potential pathogenic and prognostic differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in breast adenocarcinoma through bioinformatic analysis of public datasets. Methods: Four datasets (GSE21422, GSE29431, GSE42568, and GSE61304) from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset were used for the bioinformatic analysis. DEGs were identified using LIMMA Package of R. The GO (Gene Ontology) and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) analyses were conducted through FunRich. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the DEGs was established through STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes database) website, visualized by Cytoscape and further analyzed by Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE). UALCAN and Kaplan-Meier (KM) plotter were employed to analyze the expression levels and prognostic values of hub genes. The expression levels of the hub genes were also validated in clinical samples from breast cancer patients. In addition, the gene-drug interaction network was constructed using Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD). Results: In total, 203 up-regulated and 118 down-regulated DEGs were identified. Mitotic cell cycle and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathway were the major enriched pathways for the up-regulated and down-regulated genes, respectively. The PPI network was constructed with 314 nodes and 1,810 interactions, and two significant modules are selected. The most significant enriched pathway in module 1 was the mitotic cell cycle. Moreover, six hub genes were selected and validated in clinical sample for further analysis owing to the high degree of connectivity, including CDK1, CCNA2, TOP2A, CCNB1, KIF11, and MELK, and they were all correlated to worse overall survival (OS) in breast cancer. Conclusion: These results revealed that mitotic cell cycle and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition pathway could be potential pathways accounting for the progression in breast cancer, and CDK1, CCNA2, TOP2A, CCNB1, KIF11, and MELK may be potential crucial genes. Further, it could be utilized as new biomarkers for prognosis and potential new targets for drug synthesis of breast cancer.

Project description:Background:Basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer (BC) and links to poor outcomes. As the molecular mechanism of BLBC has not yet been completely discovered, identification of key pathways and hub genes of this disease is an important way for providing new insights into exploring the mechanisms of BLBC initiation and progression. Objective:The aim of this study was to identify potential gene signatures of the development and progression of the BLBC via bioinformatics analysis. Methods and results:The differential expressed genes (DEGs) including 40 up-regulated and 21 down-regulated DEGs were identified between GSE25066 and GSE21422 microarrays, and these DEGs were significantly enriched in the terms related to oncogenic or suppressive roles in BLBC progression. In addition, KEGG pathway and GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) enrichment analyses were performed for DEGs between the basal type and non-basal-type breast cancer from GSE25066 microarray. These DEGs were enriched in pathways such as cell cycle, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, chemokine signaling pathway, central carbon metabolism signaling and TNF signaling pathway. Moreover, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed with those 61 DEGs using the Cytoscape software, and the biological significance of putative modules was established using MCODE. The module 1 was found to be closely related with a term of mitosis regulation and enriched in cell cycle pathway, and thus confirmed the pathological characteristic of BLBC with a high mitotic index. Furthermore, prediction values of the top 10 hub genes such as CCNB2, BUB1, NDC80, CENPE, KIF2C, TOP2A, MELK, TPX2, CKS2 and KIF20A were validated using Oncomine and Kaplan-Meier plotter. Conclusion:Our results suggest the intriguing possibility that the hub genes and modules in the PPI network contributed to in-depth knowledge about the molecular mechanism of BLBC, paving a way for more accurate discovery of potential treatment targets for BLBC patients.

Project description:ImportanceLuminal and basal subtypes of primary prostate cancer have been shown to be molecularly distinct and clinically important in predicting response to therapy. These subtypes have not been described in metastatic prostate cancer.ObjectivesTo identify clinical and molecular correlates of luminal and basal subtypes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and investigate differences in survival, particularly after treatment with androgen-signaling inhibitors (ASIs).Design, setting, and participantsIn this cohort study, a retrospective analysis was conducted of 4 cohorts with mCRPC (N = 634) across multiple academic centers. Treatment was at the physicians' discretion. Details of the study cohorts have been published elsewhere between 2016 and 2019. Data were analyzed from March 2018 to February 2021.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary clinical end point was overall survival from the date of tissue biopsy/molecular profiling. Luminal and basal subtypes were also stratified by postbiopsy ASI treatment. The primary molecular analyses included associations with small cell/neuroendocrine prostate cancer (SCNC), molecular pathways, and DNA alterations.ResultsIn the 634 patients, 288 (45%) had tumors classified as luminal, and 346 (55%) had tumors classified as basal. However, 53 of 59 (90%) SCNC tumors were basal (P < .001). Similar to primary prostate cancer, luminal tumors exhibited overexpression of AR pathway genes. In basal tumors, a significantly higher rate of RB1 loss (23% basal vs 4% luminal; P < .001), FOXA1 alterations (36% basal vs 27% luminal; P = .03) and MYC alterations (73% basal vs 56% luminal; P < .001) were identified. Patients with basal tumors had worse overall survival compared with those with luminal tumors only in patients treated with an ASI postbiopsy (East Coast Dream Team: hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.20-0.74; P = .004; West Coast Dream Team: HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.97; P = .04). Among patients with luminal tumors, those treated with an ASI had significantly better survival (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.53; P < .001), whereas patients with basal tumors did not (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.36-1.04, P = .07). The interaction term between subtype and ASI treatment was statistically significant (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.89; P = .02).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings represent the largest integrated clinical, transcriptomic, and genomic analysis of mCRPC samples to date, and suggest that mCRPC can be classified as luminal and basal tumors. Analogous to primary prostate cancer, these data suggest that the benefit of ASI treatment is more pronounced in luminal tumors and support the use of ASIs in this population. In the basal tumors, a chemotherapeutic approach could be considered in some patients given the similarity to SCNC and the diminished benefit of ASI therapy. Further validation in prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Project description:Breast cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease that is clinically classified into several subtypes. Among these subtypes, basal-like breast cancer largely overlaps with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and these two groups are generally studied together as a single entity. Differences in the molecular makeup of breast cancers can result in different treatment strategies and prognoses for patients with different breast cancer subtypes. Compared with other subtypes, basal-like and other ER+ breast cancer subtypes exhibit marked differences in etiologic factors, clinical characteristics and therapeutic potential. Anthracycline drugs are typically used as the first-line clinical treatment for basal-like breast cancer subtypes. However, certain patients develop drug resistance following chemotherapy, which can lead to disease relapse and death. Even among patients with basal-like breast cancer, there can be significant molecular differences, and it is difficult to identify specific drug resistance proteins in any given patient using conventional variance testing methods. Therefore, we designed a new method for identifying drug resistance genes. Subgroups, personalized biomarkers, and therapy targets were identified using cluster analysis of differentially expressed genes. We found that basal-like breast cancer could be further divided into at least four distinct subgroups, including two groups at risk for drug resistance and two groups characterized by sensitivity to pharmacotherapy. Based on functional differences among these subgroups, we identified nine biomarkers related to drug resistance: SYK, LCK, GAB2, PAWR, PPARG, MDFI, ZAP70, CIITA and ACTA1. Finally, based on the deviation scores of the examined pathways, 16 pathways were shown to exhibit varying degrees of abnormality in the various subgroups, indicating that patients with different subtypes of basal-like breast cancer can be characterized by differences in the functional status of these pathways. Therefore, these nine differentially expressed genes and their associated functional pathways should provide the basis for novel personalized clinical treatments of basal-like breast cancer.

Project description:Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated deaths among females. In recent decades, microRNAs (miRNAs), a type of short non-coding RNA that regulates gene expression at the post-transcription level, have been reported to participate in the regulation of many hub genes associated with tumorigenesis, tumor progression, and metastasis. However, the precise mechanism by which miRNAs regulate breast cancer metastasis remains poorly discussed, which limits the opportunity for the development of novel, effective therapeutic targets. Here, we aimed to determine the miR-622-related principal regulatory mechanism in cancer. First, we found that miR-622 was significantly related to a poor prognosis in various cancers. By utilizing an integrated miRNA prediction process, we identified 77 promising targets and constructed a protein-protein interaction network. Furthermore, enrichment analyses, including GO and KEGG pathway analyses, were performed to determine the potential function of miR-622, which revealed regulation networks and potential functions of miR-622. Then, we identified a key cluster comprised of six hub genes in the protein-protein interaction network. These genes were further chosen for pan-cancer expression, prognostic and predictive marker analyses based on the TCGA and GEO datasets to mine the potential clinical values of these hub genes. To further validate our bioinformatic results, the regulatory axis of miR-622 and RNF8, one of the hub genes recently reported to promote breast cancer cell EMT process and breast cancer metastasis, was selected as in vitro proof of concept. In vitro, we demonstrated the direct regulation of RNF8 by miR-622 and found that the predicted miR-622-RNF8 axis could regulate RNF8-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell migration, and cell viability. These results were further demonstrated with rescue experiments. We established a closed-loop miRNA-target-phenotype research model that integrated the bioinformatic analysis of the miRNA target genes and experimental validation of the identified key miRNA-target-phenotype axis. We not only identified the hub target genes of miR-622 in silico but also revealed the regulatory mechanism of miR-622 in breast cancer cell EMT process, viability, and migration in vitro for the first time.

Project description:Background:Alcohol-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was reported to be diagnosed at a later stage, but the mechanism was unknown. This study aimed to identify special key genes (SKGs) during alcohol-related HCC development and progression. Methods:The mRNA data of 369 HCC patients and the clinical information were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas project (TCGA). The 310 patients with certain HCC-related risk factors were included for analysis and divided into seven groups according to the risk factors. Survival analyses were applied for the HCC patients of different groups. The patients with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infection only were combined into the HCC-V group for further analysis. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the HCCs with alcohol consumption only (HCC-A) and HCC-V tumors were identified through limma package in R with cutoff criteria?log2 fold change (logFC)|>1.0 and p < 0.05. The DEGs between eight alcohol-related HCCs and their paired normal livers of GSE59259 from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) were identified through GEO2R (a built-in tool in GEO database) with cutoff criteria |logFC|> 2.0 and adj.p < 0.05. The intersection of the two sets of DEGs was considered SKGs which were then investigated for their specificity through comparisons between HCC-A and other four HCC groups. The SKGs were analyzed for their correlations with HCC-A stage and grade and their prognostic power for HCC-A patients. The expressional differences of the SKGs in the HCCs in whole were also investigated through Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA). The SKGs in HCC were validated through Oncomine database analysis. Results:Pathological stage is an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients. HCC-A patients were diagnosed later than HCC patients with other risk factors. Ten SKGs were identified and nine of them were confirmed for their differences in paired samples of HCC-A patients. Three (SLC22A10, CD5L, and UROC1) and four (SLC22A10, UROC1, CSAG3, and CSMD1) confirmed genes were correlated with HCC-A stage and grade, respectively. SPP2 had a lower trend in HCC-A tumors and was negatively correlated with HCC-A stage and grade. The SKGs each was differentially expressed between HCC-A and at least one of other HCC groups. CD5L was identified to be favorable prognostic factor for overall survival while CSMD1 unfavorable prognostic factor for disease-free survival for HCC-A patients and HCC patients in whole. Through Oncomine database, the dysregulations of the SKGs in HCC and their clinical significance were confirmed. Conclusion:The poor prognosis of HCC-A patients might be due to their later diagnosis. The SKGs, especially the four stage-correlated genes (CD5L, SLC22A10, UROC1, and SPP2) might play important roles in HCC development, especially alcohol-related HCC development and progression. CD5L might be useful for overall survival and CSMD1 for disease-free survival predication in HCC, especially alcohol-related HCC.

Project description:Background Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers and the primary cause of cancer-related deaths in the world. The 5-year survival of lung cancer patients is lower than 15%. As a common subtype of lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma still has a high morbidity and mortality, although many strategies have been made, such as surgical operation, chemotherapy, targeted therapy. The use of gene expression microarray has provided a feasible and effective approach for the study on lung cancer. However, the biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets of lung adenocarcinomas are still not completely identified. Our study is aimed to find biomarkers and therapeutic targets of lung adenocarcinomas by identifying the key protein-coding gene in lung adenocarcinomas by bioinformatical approaches. Methods We selected and obtained messenger RNA microarray datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus database to identify differentially expressed genes between lung adenocarcinomas and normal lung tissue. The differentially expressed genes were clarified by Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway, the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and statistical analyses. Subsequently, quantitative real-time PCR was used to verify the results of bioinformatic analysis. Results We obtained 1,264, 896 and 408 differentially expressed genes from GSE32863, GSE43458 and GSE63459, respectively. The 242 common differentially expressed genes in three datasets were related to cell adhesion molecules, ECM-receptor interaction, leukocyte transendothelial migration according to KEGG analysis. GO analysis showed that these common differentially expressed genes were enriched in tumor-related functions. ASPM, CCNB2, CDC20, CDC45, MELK, TOP2A and UBE2T and KIAA0101 have the strongest protein-protein interaction relationships based on protein-protein interaction networks. Survival analysis showed that these nine genes were closely related to the survival of lung adenocarcinomas. The further qRT-PCR assays indicated that seven key genes (ASPM, CCNB2, CDC20, CDC45, MELK, TOP2A and UBE2T) display differential profile between clinical lung adenocarcinoma specimens and their matched normal tissues. Conclusions ASPM, CCNB2, CDC20, CDC45, MELK, TOP2A and UBE2T may be key protein coding genes in lung adenocarcinoma, and deserve further study to verify their feasibility and effectiveness as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for lung adenocarcinomas.

Dataset Information

Identification of key genes unique to the luminal a and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis.

Publications

Identification of key genes unique to the luminal a and basal-like breast cancer subtypes via bioinformatic analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets