Endoscopic resection of a duodenal Brunner gland hamartoma presenting with GI bleeding.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Keihanian T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7570429 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Endoscopic resection of a duodenal Brunner gland hamartoma presenting with GI bleeding.
Keihanian Tara T England Jonathan S JS Amin Sunil S
VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20200627 10
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5990423 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Brunner's gland hamartoma is a rare benign duodenal tumor. It occurs in Brunner's glands, which are found in the duodenum and produce secretions that protect the duodenum from pancreatic enzymes, gastric acid, and other agents. Endoscopic or surgical resection is required for these hamartomas. Duodenal intussusception is a relatively rare condition, usually caused by the presence of benign tumors, such as fibroadenomas, lipomas, papillomas, or sometimes with malignant neoplasms. We report a case of giant Brunner's gland hamartoma in the duodenum causing antiperistaltic intussusception in a 45-year-old female patient. The patient reported a 3-year history of chronic anemia, and this mass was detected incidentally by computed tomography (CT) during investigations for chronic anemia and weight loss. Pre-operative abdominal and pelvis contrast revealed a sausage-shaped intraluminal structure with alternating fat planes and vessels distended in the third part of the duodenum up to the first part of the duodenum. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy was performed. The patient recovered very slowly and was discharged on postoperative day 15 in good condition. Histology showed a large polypoid mass measuring 12.0 × 7.5 × 2.0 cm3, consistent with Brunner's gland hamartoma. Brunner's gland hamartoma can present with features of duodenal intussusception or ampullary obstruction but is rarely seen to cause retrograde jejuno-duodenal intussusception. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is the best surgical option in adult patients with intestinal intussusception associated with giant lesions close to the ampulla of Vater, especially in the presence of features of malignancy.
| S-EPMC6327855 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundNon-hypothalamic glioneural hamartomas are rare entities known to cause medically refractory epilepsy. Olfactory bulb hamartomas, in particular, are exceptionally rare.MethodsWe describe a case of an olfactory bulb hamartoma that was surgically resected at our institution. We also performed a literature review of all glioneural hamartomas and discuss the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of these lesions.ResultsHerein, we present the unusual case of a typically developing 17-year-old boy with a near life-long history of drug-resistant epilepsy, found to have a 0.8 × 1.0 cm right olfactory bulb hamartoma. Endoscopic endonasal trans-cribriform resection of the lesion led to seizure freedom in the 6-month follow-up period (Engel class 1 outcome). Comprehensive literature review revealed only one other sporadic case, which was also successfully treated with total surgical resection.ConclusionsOur case of an olfactory bulb hamartoma adds to the limited literature currently available, illustrating key clinical characteristics of these exceedingly rare lesions and outlining an effective, minimally invasive, and low-morbidity treatment strategy.
| S-EPMC11579163 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11022307 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Aims Duodenal polyps have a reported incidence of 0.3% to 4.6%. Sporadic, nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNDAs) comprise less than 10% of all duodenal polyps, and ampullary adenomas are even less common. Nonetheless, the incidence continues to rise because of widespread endoscopy use. Duodenal polyps with villous features or those that are larger than 10 mm may raise concern for malignancy and require removal. We demonstrate endoscopic resection of SNDAs and ampullary adenomas using some of our preferred techniques. Methods The duodenum has several components that can make EMR of duodenal polyps technically challenging. Not only does the duodenum have a thin muscle layer, but it is also highly mobile and vascular, which may explain higher rates of perforation and bleeding of duodenal EMR reported in the literature compared with colon EMR. A standard adult gastroscope with a distal cap is commonly used for duodenal EMRs. Based on the location, however, side-viewing duodenoscopes or pediatric colonoscopes may be used. To prepare for EMR, a submucosal injection is performed for an adequate lift. The polyp is then resected via stiff monofilament snares and subsequently closed with hemostatic clips if feasible. The ampullectomy technique differs slightly from duodenal EMRs and carries the additional risk of pancreatitis. Submucosal injection in the ampulla may not lift well; thus, its utility is debatable. Biliary sphincterotomy should be performed, and based on endoscopist preference, the pancreatic duct (PD) guidewire can be left during resection to maintain access. After resection, a PD stent is placed to minimize pancreatitis risk. Results The video shows the aforementioned duodenal EMR techniques. Two clips of ampullectomy are also shown in the video. Conclusions A few common techniques used to perform duodenal EMR and ampullectomy are highlighted in the video. It is important to understand and manage adverse events associated with these procedures and to have established surveillance plans. Video Video 1 EMR techniques of duodenal and ampullary adenomas.
| S-EPMC10422085 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAmpullary adenomas are lesions at the duodenum's major papilla commonly associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) but may also occur sporadically. Historically, ampullary adenomas were removed surgically, however endoscopic resection has become the preferred method of resection. Most of the literature on management of ampullary adenomas are small single-center retrospective reviews. The objective of this study is to describe endoscopic papillectomy outcomes to further refine management guidelines.MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients who underwent endoscopic papillectomy. Demographic data were included. Details regarding lesions and procedures were also collected, including endoscopic impression, size, resection method and adjunctive therapies. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis rank-sum, and t-tests were performed.ResultsA total of 90 patients were included. 60% patients (54 of 90) had pathology-proven adenomas. 14.4% of all lesions (13 of 90) and 18.5% of adenomas (10 of 54) were treated with APC. Among APC-treated lesions, 36.4% developed recurrence (4 of 11) vs. 7.1% developed residual lesion (1 of 14) (P=0.019). 15.6% of all lesions (14 of 90) and 18.5% of adenomas (10 of 54) reported complications, and the most common was pancreatitis (11.1% and 5.6%). Median follow-up time was 8 months for all lesions and 14 months (range, 1-177 months) for adenomas, with time to recurrence 30 and 31 months (range, 1-137 months), respectively. Recurrence was observed in 16.7% of all lesions (15 of 90) and 20.4% of adenomas (11 of 54). Endoscopic success was observed in 69.2% of all lesions (54 of 78) and 71.4% of adenomas (35 of 49) after removing patients lost to follow-up.ConclusionsEndoscopic papillectomy is an effective method for managing duodenal adenomas. Pathology-proven adenoma should undergo surveillance for at least 31 months. Lesions treated with APC may require closer follow-up and for a prolonged period.
| S-EPMC10184035 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC11399853 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC5989045 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEndoscopic intervention is often the first line of therapy for GI nonvariceal bleeding. Although some of the devices and techniques used for this purpose have been well studied, others are relatively new, with few available outcomes data.MethodsIn this document, we review devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of nonvariceal GI bleeding, the evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, and financial considerations for their use.ResultsDevices used for endoscopic hemostasis in the GI tract can be classified into injection devices (needles), thermal devices (multipolar/bipolar probes, hemostatic forceps, heater probe, argon plasma coagulation, radiofrequency ablation, and cryotherapy), mechanical devices (clips, suturing devices, banding devices, stents), and topical devices (hemostatic sprays).ConclusionsEndoscopic evaluation and treatment remains a cornerstone in the management of nonvariceal upper- and lower-GI bleeding. A variety of devices is available for hemostasis of bleeding lesions in the GI tract. Other than injection therapy, which should not be used as monotherapy, there are few compelling data that strongly favor any one device over another. For endoscopists, the choice of a hemostatic device should depend on the type and location of the bleeding lesion, the availability of equipment and expertise, and the cost of the device.
| S-EPMC6616320 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6408927 | biostudies-literature