Dataset Information

Extended approach to sum of absolute differences method for improved identification of periods in biomedical time series.

ABSTRACT: Time series are a common data type in biomedical applications. Examples include heart rate, power output, and ECG. One of the typical analysis methods is to determine longest period a subject spent over a given heart rate threshold. While it might seem simple to find and measure such periods, biomedical data are often subject to significant noise and physiological artifacts. As a result, simple threshold calculations might not provide correct or expected results. A common way to improve such calculations is to use moving average filter. Length of the window is often determined using sum of absolute differences for various windows sizes. However, for real life biomedical data such approach might lead to extremely long windows that undesirably remove physiological information from the data. In this paper, we:•propose a new approach to finding windows length using zero-points of third gradient (jerk) of Sum of Absolute Differences method;•demonstrate how these points can be used to determine periods and area over a given threshold with and without uncertainty.We demonstrate validity of this approach on the PAMAP2 Physical Activity Monitoring Data Set, an open dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, as well as on the PhysioNet Simultaneous Physiological Measurements dataset. It shows that first zero-point usually falls at around 8 and 5 second window length respectively, while second zero-point usually falls between 16 and 24 and 8-16 s respectively. The value for the first zero-point can remove simple measurement errors when data are recorded once every few seconds. The value for the second zero-point corresponds well with what is known about physiological response of heart to changing load.

SUBMITTER: Wiktorski T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7575807 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Extended approach to sum of absolute differences method for improved identification of periods in biomedical time series.

Wiktorski Tomasz T Królak Aleksandra A

MethodsX 20201009

Time series are a common data type in biomedical applications. Examples include heart rate, power output, and ECG. One of the typical analysis methods is to determine longest period a subject spent over a given heart rate threshold. While it might seem simple to find and measure such periods, biomedical data are often subject to significant noise and physiological artifacts. As a result, simple threshold calculations might not provide correct or expected results. A common way to improve such cal ...[more]

PMID: 33102157

Similar Datasets

Project description:MotivationMost modern intensive care units record the physiological and vital signs of patients. These data can be used to extract signatures, commonly known as biomarkers, that help physicians understand the biological complexity of many syndromes. However, most biological biomarkers suffer from either poor predictive performance or weak explanatory power. Recent developments in time series classification focus on discovering shapelets, i.e. subsequences that are most predictive in terms of class membership. Shapelets have the advantage of combining a high predictive performance with an interpretable component-their shape. Currently, most shapelet discovery methods do not rely on statistical tests to verify the significance of individual shapelets. Therefore, identifying associations between the shapelets of physiological biomarkers and patients that exhibit certain phenotypes of interest enables the discovery and subsequent ranking of physiological signatures that are interpretable, statistically validated and accurate predictors of clinical endpoints.ResultsWe present a novel and scalable method for scanning time series and identifying discriminative patterns that are statistically significant. The significance of a shapelet is evaluated while considering the problem of multiple hypothesis testing and mitigating it by efficiently pruning untestable shapelet candidates with Tarone's method. We demonstrate the utility of our method by discovering patterns in three of a patient's vital signs: heart rate, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure that are indicators of the severity of a future sepsis event, i.e. an inflammatory response to an infective agent that can lead to organ failure and death, if not treated in time.Availability and implementationWe make our method and the scripts that are required to reproduce the experiments publicly available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/S3M.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Project description:Background: Digital clinical measures collected via various digital sensing technologies such as smartphones, smartwatches, wearables, and ingestible and implantable sensors are increasingly used by individuals and clinicians to capture the health outcomes or behavioral and physiological characteristics of individuals. Time series classification (TSC) is very commonly used for modeling digital clinical measures. While deep learning models for TSC are very common and powerful, there exist some fundamental challenges. This review presents the non-deep learning models that are commonly used for time series classification in biomedical applications that can achieve high performance. Objective: We performed a systematic review to characterize the techniques that are used in time series classification of digital clinical measures throughout all the stages of data processing and model building. Methods: We conducted a literature search on PubMed, as well as the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases using a range of search terms to retrieve peer-reviewed articles that report on the academic research about digital clinical measures from a five-year period between June 2016 and June 2021. We identified and categorized the research studies based on the types of classification algorithms and sensor input types. Results: We found 452 papers in total from four different databases: PubMed, IEEE, Web of Science Database, and SCOPUS. After removing duplicates and irrelevant papers, 135 articles remained for detailed review and data extraction. Among these, engineered features using time series methods that were subsequently fed into widely used machine learning classifiers were the most commonly used technique, and also most frequently achieved the best performance metrics (77 out of 135 articles). Statistical modeling (24 out of 135 articles) algorithms were the second most common and also the second-best classification technique. Conclusions: In this review paper, summaries of the time series classification models and interpretation methods for biomedical applications are summarized and categorized. While high time series classification performance has been achieved in digital clinical, physiological, or biomedical measures, no standard benchmark datasets, modeling methods, or reporting methodology exist. There is no single widely used method for time series model development or feature interpretation, however many different methods have proven successful.

Dataset Information

Extended approach to sum of absolute differences method for improved identification of periods in biomedical time series.

Publications

Extended approach to sum of absolute differences method for improved identification of periods in biomedical time series.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets