Dataset Information

Concurrent use of aspirin with osimertinib is associated with improved survival in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Osimertinib is the treatment of choice for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, novel strategies to improve the duration of disease control are still urgently needed. Aspirin has been shown to decrease cancer incidence and improve outcomes in various malignancies. Therefore, we evaluated a cohort of patients who received osimertinib with or without concurrent use of aspirin to assess whether the addition of aspirin may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

Methods

MD Anderson Cancer Center GEMINI database was retrospectively queried for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who received osimertinib with or without concurrent use of aspirin for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 365 patients were identified including 77 which had concurrent use of aspirin. Patients in the aspirin-osimertinib group had significantly improved PFS (21.3 vs 11.6 months; HR, 0.52; 95 % CI, 0.38-0.70) and OS (Not reached vs 32.3 months; HR, 0.56; 95 % CI, 0.35-0.91) compared to osimertinib group. In subgroup analyses, the aspirin-associated PFS benefit was observed in patients with and without central nervous system (CNS) metastases, as well as in osimertinib first-line setting and in subsequent line setting. The median PFS in EGFR 19Del patients was longer than EGFR L858R patients with osimertinib, and when aspirin was added, the median PFS significantly improved in both groups regardless of lines of therapy. The benefit from aspirin was independent of age, gender, TP53 mutational status, or PD-L1 positivity.

Conclusion

Concurrent aspirin use with osimertinib in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was associated with improved survival, regardless of lines of therapy, CNS metastatic status, EGFR mutation type, age, gender, TP53, and PD-L1 status.

SUBMITTER: Liu X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7577964 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundClassifying the progression pattern had been proved to be momentous for predicting efficacy and guiding treatment in the 1st/2nd generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), while lack evidence in the 3rd generation EGFR-TKIs. This study aimed to classify tumor progression of osimertinib in EGFR+ advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exploring the characteristics and the clinical significance of each progression pattern.MethodsAfter screening 1,125 lung cancer patients, 168 EGFR T790M+ advanced patients using osimertinib were enrolled and divided into two groups and five clinical progression models according to the time course of the tumor progression. The prognosis and characteristics, such as gender, age, metastases, of each model were analyzed and compared by Kaplan-Meier method, t-test, and linear regression.ResultsComplete follow-up data were available for 117 of the 168 patients. Progressive disease (PD) occurred in 89 patients at an average onset of 6.59 months since using osimertinib, with 79.78% of patients experiencing enlargement of some preexisting lesions before PD. Among the five progression models, the 'Rapid Enlargement' (10.11%) model, the 'Rapid New Lesion' model (10.11%), the 'Delayed Enlargement' model (29.21%), the 'Delayed New Lesion' model (15.73%), and the 'Non-targeted Enlargement' model (34.83%), the 'Non-targeted Enlargement' model had the worst prognosis, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.1 months (P=0.046). The mPFS of other models was similar, with the largest difference in the time interval between the beginning of osimertinib treatment to the first appearance of target lesion enlargement (Tm-e). Smoking history (P=0.046) and the location of the initial (P=0.048), enlarged (P=0.003), and progressive lesions (P=0.002) affected the progression models, while gender, age, and treatment lines had no effect. The Tm-e was related to the overall disease control time with a correlation coefficient of 0.667 (P=0.000). The appearance of a malignant pleural effusion had an impact on progression.ConclusionsWe tried to create a classification system for describing the failure of the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib including two groups, subdivided into five progression models based on the time course of tumor lesion changes. The system might be conducive to predict the prognosis and be potential to assist in selecting subsequent treatment strategies.

Project description:BackgroundOsimertinib-the third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-has been widely used as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib demonstrated central nervous system activity in patients with brain metastasis; however, its efficacy against other distant metastatic organs, including bone and liver, remains unclear. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy of osimertinib in these patients in comparison to other EGFR-TKIs.MethodsClinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC receiving gefitinib/erlotinib (n = 183), afatinib (n = 55), or osimertinib (n = 150) at five medical institutions were retrospectively assessed for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and best overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn univariate and multivariate analyses, most distant metastases, including the brain and bone, were unrelated to the therapeutic efficacy of osimertinib, although liver metastasis and L858R mutation were independently associated with shorter PFS. PFS and OS in patients with liver metastases were significantly shorter than those in patients without liver metastases (PFS: 7.4 vs. 19.7 months, OS: 12.1 months vs. not reached, respectively). Osimertinib provided significantly longer PFS in patients with brain or bone metastasis and exon 19 deletion than the other EGFR-TKIs. The PFS of patients with liver metastases was not significantly different among the three EGFR-TKI groups. Furthermore, the ORR of osimertinib in patients with liver metastases was significantly attenuated, and the effectiveness was similar to 1st- or 2nd -generation EGFR-TKIs.ConclusionOsimertinib provided better clinical benefits than 1st- and 2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, particularly those with brain or bone metastases and exon 19 deletion; however, its efficacy against liver metastasis was remarkably attenuated. New therapeutic developments for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with liver metastases are needed.