Dataset Information

Maternal Socioeconomic Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Neonatal Anthropometry.

ABSTRACT: Disparities in birthweight by maternal race/ethnicity are commonly observed. It is unclear to what extent these disparities are correlates of individual socioeconomic factors. In a prospective cohort of 1645 low-risk singleton pregnancies included in the NICHD Fetal Growth Study (2009-2013), neonatal anthropometry was measured by trained personnel using a standard protocol. Socioeconomic characteristics included employment status, marital status, health insurance, annual income, and education. Separate adjusted generalized linear models were fit to both test the effect of race/ethnicity and the interaction of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic characteristics on neonatal anthropometry. Mean infant birthweight, length, head circumference, and abdominal circumference all differed by race/ethnicity (p < 0.001). We observed no statistically significant interactions between race/ethnicity and full-time employment/student status, marital status, insurance, or education in association with birthweight, neonatal exam weight, length, or head or abdominal circumference at examination. The interaction between income and race/ethnicity was significant only for abdominal circumference (p = 0.027), with no other significant interactions for other growth parameters, suggesting that racial/ethnic differences in neonatal anthropometry did not vary by individual socioeconomic factors in low-risk women. Our results do not preclude structural factors, such as lifetime exposure to poverty, as an explanation for racial/ethnic disparities.

SUBMITTER: Lambert C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7579630 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Maternal Socioeconomic Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Neonatal Anthropometry.

Lambert Calvin C Gleason Jessica L JL Pugh Sarah J SJ Liu Aiyi A Bever Alaina A Grobman William A WA Newman Roger B RB Wing Deborah D Gerlanc Nicole M NM Tekola-Ayele Fasil F Grantz Katherine L KL

International journal of environmental research and public health 20201007 19

Disparities in birthweight by maternal race/ethnicity are commonly observed. It is unclear to what extent these disparities are correlates of individual socioeconomic factors. In a prospective cohort of 1645 low-risk singleton pregnancies included in the NICHD Fetal Growth Study (2009-2013), neonatal anthropometry was measured by trained personnel using a standard protocol. Socioeconomic characteristics included employment status, marital status, health insurance, annual income, and education. S ...[more]

PMID: 33036433

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Little is known about racial-ethnic differences in the distribution of maternal serum levels of angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors and their associations with early-onset preeclampsia. OBJECTIVE:We sought to investigate the distribution of midtrimester maternal serum levels of placental growth factor, soluble endoglin, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 and their associations with early-onset preeclampsia in whites, Hispanics, and blacks. STUDY DESIGN:A population-based nested case-control design was used to identify cases and controls of white, Hispanic, and black origin from a 2000 through 2007 live-birth cohort in 5 southern California counties. Cases included 197 women (90 whites, 67 Hispanics, and 40 blacks) with early-onset preeclampsia defined as hypertension and proteinuria with onset <32 weeks according to hospital records. Controls included a random sample of 2363 women without early-onset preeclampsia. Maternal serum specimens collected at 15-20 weeks' gestation as part of routine prenatal screening were tested for placental growth factor, soluble endoglin, and soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1. Serum levels of the 3 factors were log-normally distributed. Adjusted natural logarithmic means were compared between cases and controls and between racial-ethnic groups. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals derived from logistic regression models were calculated to measure the magnitude of the associations. RESULTS:Cases showed lower adjusted logarithmic means of placental growth factor but higher adjusted logarithmic means of soluble endoglin than controls across all 3 groups (P < .05). Cases also had higher adjusted means of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 than controls in whites (7.75 vs 7.52 log pg/mL, P < .05) and Hispanics (7.73 vs 7.40 log pg/mL, P < .05) but not in blacks (7.85 vs 7.69 log pg/mL, P = .47). Blacks were found to have higher levels of placental growth factor in both cases and controls when compared to whites and Hispanics (adjusted means: 4.69 and 5.20 log pg/mL in blacks, 4.08 and 4.78 log pg/mL in whites, and 3.89 and 4.70 log pg/mL in Hispanics, respectively, P < .05). Hispanic cases had the highest adjusted mean of soluble endoglin compared to white and black cases (9.24, 9.05, and 8.93 log pg/mL, respectively, P < .05). The weakest association of early-onset preeclampsia with placental growth factor and soluble endoglin was observed in blacks. The adjusted odds ratio per log pg/mL increase of the 2 analytes were 0.219 (95% confidence interval, 0.124-0.385) and 5.02 (95% confidence interval, 2.56-9.86) in blacks in comparison to 0.048 (95% confidence interval, 0.026-0.088) and 36.87 (95% confidence interval, 17.00-79.96) in whites (P < .05) and 0.028 (95% confidence interval, 0.013-0.060) and 86.68 (95% confidence interval, 31.46-238.81) in Hispanics (P < .05), respectively. As for soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1, the association was not significantly different among the racial-ethnic groups. CONCLUSION:Racial-ethnic differences were observed in the distribution of midtrimester maternal levels of placental growth factor and soluble endoglin and in the associations with early-onset preeclampsia. These differences should be considered in future studies to improve etiologic and prognostic understanding of early-onset preeclampsia.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine the extent to which socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in cancer screening discussion between a patient and his/her primary care physician are due to "within-physician" differences (the fact that patients were treated differently by the same physicians) versus "between-physician" differences (that they were treated by a different group of physicians).Data sourcesWe use data from the baseline patient and physician surveys of two community trials from the Communication in Medical Care (CMC) research series. The two studies combined provide an analysis sample of 5,978 patients ages 50-80 nested within 191 primary care physicians who practiced throughout Southern California.Study designOur main outcomes of interest are whether the physician has ever talked to the patient about fecal occult blood test (FOBT; for colorectal cancer screening), mammogram (for breast cancer screening, female patients only) and the prostate-specific antigen test (PSA, male patients only). We consider five racial/ethnic groups: non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, and other race/ethnicity. We measure socioeconomic status by both income and education. For each type of cancer screening discussion, we first estimate a probit model that includes patient characteristics as the only covariates to assess the overall differences. We then add physician fixed effects to derive estimates of "within-" versus "between-" physician differences.Principal findingsThere was a strong education gradient in the discussion of all three types of cancer screening and most of the education differences arose within physicians. Disparities by income were less consistent across different screening methods, but seemed to have arisen mainly because of "between-physician" differences. Asians were much less likely, compared with whites, to have received discussion about FOBT and PSA and these differences were mainly "within-physician" differences. Black female patients, however, were much more likely, compared with whites treated by the same physicians, to have discussed mammogram with their physicians.ConclusionsDifferences in cancer screening discussion along the different dimensions of patient SES may have arisen because of very different mechanisms and therefore call for a combination of interventions. Physicians need to be aware of the persistent disparities by patient education in clinical communication regarding cancer screening and tailor their efforts to the needs of low-education patients. Quality-improvement efforts targeted at physicians practicing in low-income communities may also be effective in addressing disparities in cancer screening communication by patient income.

Dataset Information

Maternal Socioeconomic Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Neonatal Anthropometry.

Publications

Maternal Socioeconomic Factors and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Neonatal Anthropometry.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets