Dataset Information

Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK.

ABSTRACT: When planning a multicentre clinical trial, it can be difficult to predict the time needed to open individual sites, and this in turn impacts on the total number of sites needed, the budget and the time frame for a clinical trial to be delivered successfully. This is of particular importance for funding applications with a limited time frame and budget such as NIHR RfPB. It is more efficient and cost-effective to open the total number of sites needed at the outset of a trial, rather than to respond later to slow site opening and recruitment. Here, we share our experience of successfully delivering a multicentre clinical trial for a rare disease within a limited time frame and budget by approximately doubling the number of sites initially predicted to be needed. We initially predicted 20 sites would be needed to deliver the clinical trial, but early on in the trial, the number of sites was more than doubled to allow successful recruitment of the target sample size within the desired time frame. Of the 48 ethically approved sites, the median time from ethical approval of a site to opening for recruitment was 182?days (95% confidence interval [143 to 245?days]) and ranged from 18 to 613?days. In four (9%) of these sites, part of the delay was due to pharmacy sign off not being given when R&D had issued capacity and capability (C&C). Delays due to pharmacy sign off varied from 10?days to over 3 months delay in two sites (94?days and 102?days). A mathematical solution to the problem of planning a study with a short recruitment window has been given to support the planning and costing of grants with fixed time constraints: number of sites?=?required sample size divided by (number of eligible patients per site per month times recruitment rate times (the number of months accrual minus 6?months)). We expect these results to help others who are planning multicentre clinical trials in the UK. Ethical approval from NRES Committee South West (IRAS number 225959). TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT Number 2017-001171-23 . Registered on 26 June 2017.

SUBMITTER: Greenwood R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7579882 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK.

Greenwood Rosemary R Pell Julie J Foscarini-Craggs Paula P Wale Katharine K Thomas Ian I Bradbury Charlotte C

Trials 20201021 1

When planning a multicentre clinical trial, it can be difficult to predict the time needed to open individual sites, and this in turn impacts on the total number of sites needed, the budget and the time frame for a clinical trial to be delivered successfully. This is of particular importance for funding applications with a limited time frame and budget such as NIHR RfPB. It is more efficient and cost-effective to open the total number of sites needed at the outset of a trial, rather than to resp ...[more]

PMID: 33087161

Similar Datasets

Project description:The binding of hepatic lipase to rat liver was studied in an ex vivo perfusion model. The livers were perfused with media containing partially purified rat hepatic lipase or bovine milk lipoprotein lipase. The activity of the enzymes was determined in the perfusion media before and after passage through the liver. During perfusion with a hepatic-lipase-containing medium the lipase activity in the medium did not change, indicating that there was no net binding of lipase by the liver. In contrast, more than 80% of the lipoprotein lipase was removed from the medium. This lipoprotein lipase activity could be recovered into the perfusion medium completely by heparin perfusion of the liver. If livers, first depleted of hepatic lipase by heparin, were subsequent perfused with a hepatic-lipase-containing medium, 90 +/- 24 m-units of the lipase activity was bound per g of liver (up to 1000 m-units/total liver). However, heparin treatment of the liver decreases the ability of the liver to re-bind hepatic lipase by 80%. Perfusion of rat livers with 0.3 M NaCl released 60% of the lipase activity into the medium. Upon subsequent perfusion of these livers with hepatic-lipase-containing media, 541 +/- 164 m-units of hepatic lipase could be bound per g of liver (up to 5000 m-units/total liver). The binding of hepatic lipase was also studied in livers of corticotropin (ACTH)-pre-treated rats. In these rats also, hepatic lipase bound only to livers which had been pre-perfused with heparin or 0.3 M NaCl. After heparin pre-perfusion, 88 +/- 12 m-units of hepatic lipase could be bound per g of liver, similar to that with livers of control rats not treated with ACTH. After prior salt perfusion, however, the capacity of the livers of ACTH-pre-treated rats to bind hepatic lipase was 212 +/- 60 m-units/g of liver. This is less than in livers of control rats (541 +/- 164 m-units/g of liver). These results indicate that in rat liver the binding of hepatic lipase is heterogeneous in character and consists of heparin-resistant and heparin-sensitive components. The hepatic-lipase binding capacity of the liver is saturable and fully utilized under various conditions. The heparin-sensitive binding capacity is lowered in ACTH-treated rats, whereas the heparin-resistant binding is unaffected. We postulate that the functional hepatic lipase activity can be regulated by changes in the binding capacity of the liver.

Project description:Objective:Schizophrenia clinical trials commonly measure observed changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score. However, it is more intuitive to think of response vs nonresponse, a binary outcome. Assessing binary outcomes enables calculation of number needed to treat (NNT) for therapeutic outcomes, number needed to harm (NNH) for adverse outcomes, and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH) to demonstrate benefit/risk tradeoffs. Here, NNT, NNH, and LHH were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness of aripiprazole lauroxil in patients with an acute schizophrenia exacerbation. Methods:Categorical efficacy and tolerability data were taken from the pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating aripiprazole lauroxil for treatment of an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. NNT and NNH values, with 95% CIs, were calculated in this post hoc analysis. Results:Using the intent-to-treat population for the pooled doses of aripiprazole lauroxil (441 mg [n=196] and 882 mg [n=204] q4w), responder rates (?30% improvement from baseline PANSS total score) were 35.3% for aripiprazole lauroxil arms vs 18.4% for placebo (n=196), yielding a NNT of 6 (95% CI: 5-11). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) were higher among patients randomized to placebo than to either aripiprazole lauroxil dose. Akathisia was the only AE with an incidence ?5% in each aripiprazole lauroxil group and at least twice that of placebo (11.6%, 11.5%, and 4.3% of the patients receiving aripiprazole lauroxil 441 mg, 882 mg, and placebo, respectively), producing a NNH of 14 (95% CI: 9-33) for pooled aripiprazole lauroxil doses vs placebo. Calculating LHH for therapeutic response vs akathisia, aripiprazole lauroxil was 2.3 times more likely to result in a therapeutic response than an incident of akathisia. Conclusion:Using metrics of NNT, NNH, and LHH, aripiprazole lauroxil was an efficacious and well-tolerated intervention in a pivotal study in patients with an acute schizophrenia exacerbation.

Dataset Information

Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK.

Publications

Letter on Predicting the number of sites needed to deliver a multicentre clinical trial within a limited time frame in the UK.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets