A Rare Etiology for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Regurgitation
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Arunachalam K
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7581638 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7451882 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A quadricuspid aortic valve is rarely diagnosed in children, but it can be associated with significant aortic regurgitation. It is important for pediatric cardiologists to be aware of this pathologic entity. We present a nine-year-old male, diagnosed with a quadricuspid aortic valve and mild aortic regurgitation.
| S-EPMC3957461 | biostudies-other
Project description:Graphical abstract Highlights • Understanding the mechanism of AR informs the surgical approach.• A repair-oriented classification of AR is not well appreciated by cardiologists.• Multiple mechanisms of AR frequently coexist.
| S-EPMC9270673 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We present a rare case of a young patient who underwent a bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement and subsequently experienced a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm complicated by valve dehiscence and paravalvular mitral regurgitation, demonstrated by multimodality imaging and confirmed during surgical repair. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).
| S-EPMC9175202 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7803810 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundValve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as an alternative for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic valves (BPVs) for high surgical risk patients. However, this procedure often results in patient-prosthesis mismatch. BPV fracture is a novel technique to address this problem. From now, complications following BPV fracture are few.Case summaryWe present the case of a 84-year-old female with history of first surgical aortic BPV replacement with a Mitroflow Sorin 23 mm due to severe aotic stenosis in 2009. In 2017, a second intervention due to bioprosthetic aortic valve stenosis valve was performed with valve-in-valve TAVI with CoreValve Evolut R 23 mm. In 2021, she was admitted with severe heart failure due to TAVI degeneration with severe stenosis in the bioprothesis. After heart team discussions, the patient was deemed inoperable for new heart surgery and considered as a candidate for BPV fracture as last possible alternative. After BPV fracture was performed, the patient suffered acute hypotension. Urgent transoesophageal echocardiography and angiogram demonstrated severe acute intra-TAVI aortic insufficiency because of probable disruption of the CoreValve leaflets. The patient was successfully treated with a ViV 23 mm SAPIEN three Edwards valve with a resolution of the aortic insufficiency and improvement of her haemodynamics. The patient remains asymptomatic after 6 months, with improvement in clinical status.DiscussionThis case demonstrates a disruption of the transcatheter heart valve leaflets causing severe aortic regurgitation as one of the complication of BPV fracture. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a TAVI in a patient who was already operated with ViV-TAVI. Although case series described few complications with improvement in clinical status, the procedure should be established with appropriate planning and careful technique.
| S-EPMC9388501 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRecently, the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria redefined bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the rate of BVD is scarcely reported in current practice.AimsWe aimed to evaluate the rate and predictors of BVD after TAVI based on the VARC-3 criteria.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed patients who had undergone TAVI using single-centre data. BVD was reported as exposure-adjusted event rates with a patient-year unit (per 100 patient-years). Predictors of BVD after TAVI were analysed using Fine-Gray competing risk regression to account for the competing risk of death.ResultsAmong 514 patients, the rate of BVD was 7.5 events per 100 patient-years (n=74) at a median follow-up of 1.9 years. The main cause of BVD was moderate or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM; n=59). The Fine-Gray model demonstrated that predilatation was associated with a lower rate of BVD, mainly moderate or severe PPM (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [sub-HR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.88). In a subgroup analysis, the patients with a small aortic annulus (area <400 mm2 or perimeter <72 mm) tended to benefit from predilatation (p for interaction=0.03). The same regression model also demonstrated that a small balloon-expandable valve (BEV; ≤23 mm) was associated with a higher rate of BVD (adjusted sub-HR 2.46, 95% CI: 1.38-4.38).ConclusionsOur study suggested that the rate of BVD in patients undergoing TAVI is relatively low at midterm follow-up. Predilatation, particularly in small annuli and small BEV might have an impact on BVD, mainly caused by moderate or severe PPM, after TAVI.
| S-EPMC10018288 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMajor uncertainties remain regarding disease activity within the retained native aortic valve, and regarding bioprosthetic valve durability, after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to assess native aortic valve disease activity and bioprosthetic valve durability in patients with TAVI in comparison with subjects with bioprosthetic surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).MethodsIn a multicenter cross-sectional observational cohort study, patients with TAVI or bioprosthetic SAVR underwent baseline echocardiography, computed tomography angiography, and 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography. Participants (n=47) were imaged once with 18F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography either at 1 month (n=9, 19%), 2 years (n=22, 47%), or 5 years (16, 34%) after valve implantation. Patients subsequently underwent serial echocardiography to assess for changes in valve hemodynamic performance (change in peak aortic velocity) and evidence of structural valve dysfunction. Comparisons were made with matched patients with bioprosthetic SAVR (n=51) who had undergone the same imaging protocol.ResultsIn patients with TAVI, native aortic valves demonstrated 18F-NaF uptake around the outside of the bioprostheses that showed a modest correlation with the time from TAVI (r=0.36, P=0.023). 18F-NaF uptake in the bioprosthetic leaflets was comparable between the SAVR and TAVI groups (target-to-background ratio, 1.3 [1.2-1.7] versus 1.3 [1.2-1.5], respectively; P=0.27). The frequencies of imaging evidence of bioprosthetic valve degeneration at baseline were similar on echocardiography (6% versus 8%, respectively; P=0.78), computed tomography (15% versus 14%, respectively; P=0.87), and positron emission tomography (15% versus 29%, respectively; P=0.09). Baseline 18F-NaF uptake was associated with a subsequent change in peak aortic velocity for both TAVI (r=0.7, P<0.001) and SAVR (r=0.7, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, 18F-NaF uptake was the only predictor of peak velocity progression (P<0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with TAVI, native aortic valves demonstrate evidence of ongoing active disease. Across imaging modalities, TAVI degeneration is of similar magnitude to bioprosthetic SAVR, suggesting comparable midterm durability. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02304276.
| S-EPMC8542078 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To analyse the impact of postprocedural mitral regurgitation (MR), in an interaction with aortic regurgitation (AR), on mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).To assess the interaction between MR and AR, we compared the survival rate of patients (i) without both significant MR and AR versus (ii) those with either significant MR or significant AR versus (iii) with significant MR and AR, all postprocedure. 381 participants of the Polish Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry (166 males (43.6%) and 215 females (56.4%), age 78.8±7.4 years) were analysed. Follow-up was 94.1±96.5 days.In-hospital and midterm mortality were 6.6% and 10.2%, respectively. Significant MR and AR were present in 16% and 8.1% patients, including 3.1% patients with both significant MR and AR. Patients with significant versus insignificant AR differed with respect to mortality (log rank p=0.009). This difference was not apparent in a subgroup of patients without significant MR (log rank p=0.80). In a subgroup of patients without significant AR, there were no significant differences in mortality between individuals with versus without significant MR (log rank p=0.44). Significant MR and AR had a significant impact on mortality only when associated with each other (log rank p<0.0001). At multivariate Cox regression modelling concomitant significant MR and AR were independently associated with mortality (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.54 to 5.71, p=0.002).Significant MR or AR postprocedure, when isolated, had no impact on survival. Combined MR and AR had a significant impact on a patient's prognosis.
| S-EPMC4862065 | biostudies-other
Project description:AimsBioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration demonstrates pathological similarities to aortic stenosis. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-recognized risk factor for incident aortic stenosis and disease progression. The aim of this study is to investigate whether serum Lp(a) concentrations are associated with bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration.Methods and resultsIn a post hoc analysis of a prospective multimodality imaging study (NCT02304276), serum Lp(a) concentrations, echocardiography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) angiography, and 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) were assessed in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves. Patients were also followed up for 2 years with serial echocardiography. Serum Lp(a) concentrations [median 19.9 (8.4-76.4) mg/dL] were available in 97 participants (mean age 75 ± 7 years, 54% men). There were no baseline differences across the tertiles of serum Lp(a) concentrations for disease severity assessed by echocardiography [median peak aortic valve velocity: highest tertile 2.5 (2.3-2.9) m/s vs. lower tertiles 2.7 (2.4-3.0) m/s, P = 0.204], or valve degeneration on CT angiography (highest tertile n = 8 vs. lower tertiles n = 12, P = 0.552) and 18F-NaF PET (median tissue-to-background ratio: highest tertile 1.13 (1.05-1.41) vs. lower tertiles 1.17 (1.06-1.53), P = 0.889]. After 2 years of follow-up, there were no differences in annualized change in bioprosthetic hemodynamic progression [change in peak aortic valve velocity: highest tertile [0.0 (-0.1-0.2) m/s/year vs. lower tertiles 0.1 (0.0-0.2) m/s/year, P = 0.528] or the development of structural valve degeneration.ConclusionSerum lipoprotein(a) concentrations do not appear to be a major determinant or mediator of bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration.
| S-EPMC10229296 | biostudies-literature