Dataset Information

Incidence of Hyponatremia in Patients With Indwelling Peritoneal Catheters for Drainage of Malignant Ascites.

ABSTRACT: Importance:Indwelling peritoneal catheters (IPCs) are frequently used to drain tense, symptomatic, malignant ascites. Large-volume drainage may lead to hyponatremia owing to massive salt depletion. To date, no studies have examined the epidemiology of hyponatremia after placement of an IPC. Objective:To evaluate the incidence of hyponatremia after IPC placement, the risk factors associated with its development, and how it is managed. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cohort study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 461 patients who had IPCs placed during the period between 2006 and 2016 at a tertiary care hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, of whom 309 patients met the inclusion criteria. Data analysis was performed from June to November 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures:Main outcomes were the incidence of hyponatremia (with a serum sodium level <135 mEq/L) after IPC placement, the risk factors for its development, and how it was managed. We also examined the clinical course of a subset of 21 patients with hypovolemic hyponatremia. Results:Of the 309 eligible patients with laboratory results both before IPC placement and 2 days or more after IPC placement, 189 (61.2%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 59 (12) years. The overall incidence of hyponatremia after IPC placement was 84.8% (n?=?262), of whom 21 patients (8.0%) had severe hyponatremia. The mean (SD) decrease in serum sodium level before vs after IPC placement was 5 (5.1) mEq/L and decreased by 10 mEq/L or more among 52 patients (16.8%). Patients with hyponatremia prior to IPC placement had an 8-fold higher adjusted odds of having persistent hyponatremia after IPC placement (odds ratio, 7.9; 95% CI, 2.9-21.7). Patients with hepatopancreatobiliary malignant neoplasms were more likely to develop hyponatremia (78 of 262 patients with hyponatremia [29.8%] vs 7 of 47 patients without hyponatremia [14.9%]). Hyponatremia was either unrecognized or untreated in 189 patients (61.2%). Conclusions and Relevance:Although the placement of an IPC is often a palliative measure, hyponatremia is common and is often untreated or unrecognized. Patients at highest risk, such as those with hyponatremia at baseline and those with hepatopancreatobiliary malignant neoplams, should be evaluated carefully prior to IPC placement and may warrant closer monitoring after placement. In all cases, hyponatremia should be evaluated and managed within the context of a patient's overall goals of care.

SUBMITTER: Gupta S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7588930 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Incidence of Hyponatremia in Patients With Indwelling Peritoneal Catheters for Drainage of Malignant Ascites.

Gupta Shruti S Tio Maria Clarissa MC Gutowski Emily D ED Stecker Michael S MS Verma Ashish A Motwani Shveta S SS Mount David B DB McMahon Gearoid M GM Waikar Sushrut S SS

JAMA network open 20201001 10

<h4>Importance</h4>Indwelling peritoneal catheters (IPCs) are frequently used to drain tense, symptomatic, malignant ascites. Large-volume drainage may lead to hyponatremia owing to massive salt depletion. To date, no studies have examined the epidemiology of hyponatremia after placement of an IPC.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the incidence of hyponatremia after IPC placement, the risk factors associated with its development, and how it is managed.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This c ...[more]

PMID: 33104204

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAscites is the accumulation of fluid within the abdominal cavity. Most women with advanced ovarian cancer and some women with advanced endometrial cancer need repeated drainage for ascites. Guidelines to advise those involved in the drainage of ascites are usually produced locally and are generally not evidence-based. Managing drains that improve the efficacy and quality of the procedure is key in making recommendations that could improve the quality of life (QoL) for women at this critical period of their lives.ObjectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and adverse events of different interventions for the management of malignant ascites drainage in the palliative care of women with gynaecological cancer.Search methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase to 4 November 2019. We checked clinical trial registries, grey literature, reports of conferences, citation lists of included studies, and key textbooks for potentially relevant studies.Selection criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with malignant ascites with gynaecological cancer. If studies also included women with non-gynaecological cancer, we planned to extract data specifically for women with gynaecological cancers or request the data from trial authors. If this was not possible, we planned to include the study only if at least 50% of participants were diagnosed with gynaecological cancer.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently selected studies, extracted data, evaluated the quality of the included studies, compared results, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using Cochrane methodology.Main resultsIn the original 2010 review, we identified no relevant studies. This updated review included one RCT involving 245 participants that compared abdominal paracentesis and intraperitoneal infusion of catumaxomab versus abdominal paracentesis alone. The study was at high risk of bias in almost all domains. The data were not suitable for analysis. The median time to the first deterioration of QoL ranged from 19 to 26 days in participants receiving paracentesis alone compared to 47 to 49 days among participants receiving paracentesis with catumaxomab infusion (very low-certainty evidence). Adverse events were only reported among participants receiving catumaxomab infusion. The most common severe adverse events were abdominal pain and lymphopenia (157 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on the improvement of symptoms, satisfaction of participants and caregivers, and cost-effectiveness.Authors' conclusionsCurrently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the most appropriate management of drainage for malignant ascites among women with gynaecological cancer, as there was only very low-certainty evidence from one small RCT at overall high risk of bias.

Project description:RationalePlacement of an indwelling pleural catheter is an established modality for symptom relief and pleurodesis in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. Concerns remain regarding possible infectious complications, risk of hemorrhage, and the rate of pleurodesis with the use of pleural catheters in the treatment of hematologic malignancies.ObjectivesThe goals of our study were: (1) to evaluate the safety and cumulative incidence of pleurodesis with indwelling pleural catheters for patients with hematologic malignancies, and (2) to evaluate overall survival of this cohort of patients with pleural effusions.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 172 patients with a hematologic malignancy who underwent placement of an indwelling pleural catheter between September 1997 and August 2011 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. A competing risk model analysis was used for complications and pleurodesis. Analysis was based on each patient's first intrapleural catheter.ResultsThere were 172 patients with lymphoma (58%), acute (16%) or chronic leukemia (16%), or multiple myeloma (10%). The effusions were characterized as malignant (85.5%), infectious (4.1%), volume overload (4.7%), or therapy-related (4.7%). Chylothorax was found in 20.1%. Pleural biopsies were obtained from 13 patients. The cumulative incidence of all complications was 13.6%, and the cumulative incidence of all significant catheter-related complications was 9.5%. The incidence of empyema was 2.9%, and major bleeding (requiring transfusion or intervention) was 1.7%. Thirty-day procedure-associated mortality was 0.6%. The cumulative incidence of pleurodesis at 180 days was 50%, with a median time to pleurodesis of 81 days for the entire cohort.ConclusionsIndwelling pleural catheters appear to be safe for patients with hematologic malignancies. Complications and the cumulative incidence of pleurodesis are comparable to those reported for patients with solid organ malignancies.

Dataset Information

Incidence of Hyponatremia in Patients With Indwelling Peritoneal Catheters for Drainage of Malignant Ascites.

Publications

Incidence of Hyponatremia in Patients With Indwelling Peritoneal Catheters for Drainage of Malignant Ascites.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets