Dataset Information

The Keyword Effect: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring the Role of Keywords in Clinical Communication.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Keywords, also known as "buzzwords" or "trigger words," serve as memorable descriptors to associate physical findings with specific diagnoses. These terms, such as "target lesion" and "steeple sign," liken a physical or radiographic finding to a nonmedical comparator as a means to elicit an associated diagnosis. Keywords permeate medical literature and clinical conversations. However, the potential for miscommunicating critical information exists and the impact of keywords on communication-related medical error is unknown. We explored the use of keywords and how physicians perceive their use in their clinical communication as part of patient care.

Methods

With a grounded theory approach, semistructured interviews were completed in 2016 to 2017 with a purposive sample of 15 resident and attending physicians working in one pediatric emergency department, where clinical conversations occur frequently between providers of different specialties and levels of training. Constant comparative analysis for emergent themes was conducted. We identified key themes and examined their relationships to theorize how keywords affect clinical communication.

Results

We identified three major aspects: 1) keywords belong to the culture of medicine, by which providers connect with each other using specialized terms that imply a shared experience and knowledge base. This culture encourages keyword use. 2) By encapsulating a pattern of clinical findings into one word or short phrases, keywords allow for convenient, efficient communication of both diagnoses and of thought processes between providers. 3) Keywords, however, may mislead; if incorrectly applied to a given clinical situation, they may be misinterpreted by the receiver, or they may introduce bias to diagnostic decision making.

Conclusions

More than simple descriptors, keywords can communicate entire diagnoses and activate illness scripts between providers. Also, keywords are integral to the culture and language of medicine. However, providers should be aware of the potential negative effects of keywords in clinical conversations and must balance the demands of efficient and accurate communication with the potential for miscommunication and error.

SUBMITTER: Chan MW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7592822 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Keyword Effect: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring the Role of Keywords in Clinical Communication.

Chan Michael W MW Eppich Walter J WJ

AEM education and training 20191229 4

<h4>Objectives</h4>Keywords, also known as "buzzwords" or "trigger words," serve as memorable descriptors to associate physical findings with specific diagnoses. These terms, such as "target lesion" and "steeple sign," liken a physical or radiographic finding to a nonmedical comparator as a means to elicit an associated diagnosis. Keywords permeate medical literature and clinical conversations. However, the potential for miscommunicating critical information exists and the impact of keywords on ...[more]

PMID: 33150283

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesVirtual patients (VPs) are online representations of clinical cases used in medical education. Widely adopted, they are well placed to teach clinical reasoning skills. International technology standards mean VPs can be created, shared and repurposed between institutions. A systematic review has highlighted the lack of evidence to support which of the numerous VP designs may be effective, and why. We set out to research the influence of VP design on medical undergraduates.MethodsThis is a grounded theory study into the influence of VP design on undergraduate medical students. Following a review of the literature and publicly available VP cases, we identified important design properties. We integrated them into two substantial VPs produced for this research. Using purposeful iterative sampling, 46 medical undergraduates were recruited to participate in six focus groups. Participants completed both VPs, an evaluation and a 1-hour focus group discussion. These were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using grounded theory, supported by computer-assisted analysis. Following open, axial and selective coding, we produced a theoretical model describing how students learn from VPs.ResultsWe identified a central core phenomenon designated 'learning from the VP'. This had four categories: VP Construction; External Preconditions; Student-VP Interaction, and Consequences. From these, we constructed a three-layer model describing the interactions of students with VPs. The inner layer consists of the student's cognitive and behavioural preconditions prior to sitting a case. The middle layer considers the VP as an 'encoded object', an e-learning artefact and as a 'constructed activity', with associated pedagogic and organisational elements. The outer layer describes cognitive and behavioural change.ConclusionsThis is the first grounded theory study to explore VP design. This original research has produced a model which enhances understanding of how and why the delivery and design of VPs influence learning. The model may be of practical use to authors, institutions and researchers.

Project description:BackgroundPoor adherence is the main barrier to the effectiveness of HIV medication. The objective of this study was to explore and conceptualize patterns and difficulties in physicians' work with patients' adherence to HIV medication. No previous studies on this subject have directly observed physicians' behavior.MethodsThis is a qualitative, cross-sectional study. We used a Grounded Theory approach to let the main issues in physicians' work with patients' adherence emerge without preconceiving the focus of the study. We included physicians from HIV clinics in San Francisco, U.S.A. as well as from Copenhagen, Denmark. Physicians were observed during their clinical work and subsequently interviewed with a semi-structured interview guide. Notes on observations and transcribed interviews were analyzed with NVivo software.ResultsWe enrolled 16 physicians from San Francisco and 18 from Copenhagen. When we discovered that physicians and patients seldom discussed adherence issues in depth, we made adherence communication and its barriers the focus of the study. The main patterns in physicians' communication with patients about adherence were similar in both settings. An important barrier to in-depth adherence communication was that some physicians felt it was awkward to explore the possibility of non-adherence if there were no objective signs of treatment failure, because patients could feel "accused." To overcome this awkwardness, some physicians consciously tried to "de-shame" patients regarding non-adherence. However, a recurring theme was that physicians often suspected non-adherence even when patients did not admit to have missed any doses, and physicians had difficulties handling this low believability of patient statements. We here develop a simple four-step, three-factor model of physicians' adherence communication. The four steps are: deciding whether to ask about adherence or not, pre-questioning preparations, phrasing the question, and responding to the patient's answer. The three factors/determinants are: physicians' perceptions of adherence, awkwardness, and believability.ConclusionCommunication difficulties were a main barrier in physicians' work with patients' adherence to HIV medication. The proposed model of physicians' communication with patients about adherence--and the identification of awkwardness and believability as key issues--may aid thinking on the subject for use in clinical practice and future research.

Project description:BackgroundClinical teaching-learning is a context-bound phenomenon. One of the problems related to field of medical education research is the lack of sufficient attention to context-appropriate methodologies. The purpose of this qualitative inquiry is to explain and represent teaching-learning in the clinical education of general medicine in Iran using the three types of maps situational, social worlds/arenas, positional, in combination with discourse analysis.MethodsIn this study, the authors used the situational analysis approach as a postmodern version of grounded theory. The data collection was undertaken in three stages. In the first stage, a mini literature review was conducted to highlight a possible gap in applying situational analysis in medical education research and the development of this methodology. In the second stage, the latest and most up-to-date documents of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) of Iran, the general medicine curriculum, and related documents were analyzed. Finally, the remote semi-structured interviews (web-based and telephone) were undertaken in the third stage. Participants in this stage included expert clinical teachers, medical education specialists, and students. In this study, the notes and transcripts were analyzed for the emergence and categorization of sub-themes and themes, represented in three maps.ResultsThirty-one participants were involved in the web-based interviews, while seven participants took part in the telephone interview. Based on this research, the teaching-learning situation in clinical education on general medicine in Iran was represented in three maps; situational, social worlds/arenas, and positional. In addition, the results showed, clinical education of general medicine in Iran in six positions (curriculum; culture, behavior and attitude; management and leadership; environment, space and time; financial; and technology) has serious problems and challenges. Finally, based on the horizontal axis of the positional map, recommendations were provided to develop and support effective clinical teaching.ConclusionsThe clinical learning environment is a complex and multi-layered social environment in which should be considered these numerous social layers, arenas, social worlds, and discourses while developing curricula and teaching.

Dataset Information

The Keyword Effect: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring the Role of Keywords in Clinical Communication.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The Keyword Effect: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring the Role of Keywords in Clinical Communication.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets