Dataset Information

Clinical and Hospital Factors Affecting Treatment with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are the standard of care for primary prevention (PP) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). However, PP ICD implantation is underused in Asian countries. This study investigated ICD implantation rates and factors associated with appropriate PP ICD implants for ICM. MATERIALS AND METHODS:In this prospective multicenter observational registry (ADVANCE-ICM registry), ICM patients who were eligible for PP ICD were screened and enrolled. Factors associated with appropriate ICD implantation, including hospital and clinical factors, were investigated. RESULTS:Of the 1453 ICM patients eligible for PP ICD [1111 male; median age, 71.0 (61.0-78.0) years], only 76 (5.2%) patients underwent ICD implantation. Among hospital factors, a non-monetary incentive for referral (72.4% vs. 52.9%, p=0.001) and total hospital system score (6.0 vs. 5.0, p=0.013) were higher in the ICD than in the no-ICD group. In multivariate analysis, total hospital system score [odds ratio (OR), 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.50] was an independent factor for predicting ICD implantation, along with clinical factors, including high New York Heart Association class (?III: OR, 7.29; 95% CI, 2.97-17.87) and younger age (<70 years: OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.30-3.53). CONCLUSION:PP ICD implantation for ICM patients is underused in Korea. Hospital factors were important for improving PP ICD implantation rate, suggesting that new screening and referral systems for ICM patients would improve the PP ICD implantation rate (Clinical trial registration No. NCT03590925).

SUBMITTER: Lee JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7593095 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinical and Hospital Factors Affecting Treatment with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients.

Lee Jae Hyuk JH Yu Hee Tae HT Oh Il Young IY Choi Eue Keun EK Sung Jung Hoon JH Lee Young Soo YS Kim Jong Youn JY Baek Yongsoo Y Park Junbeom J Joung Boyoung B

Yonsei medical journal 20201101 11

<h4>Purpose</h4>Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are the standard of care for primary prevention (PP) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). However, PP ICD implantation is underused in Asian countries. This study investigated ICD implantation rates and factors associated with appropriate PP ICD implants for ICM.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>In this prospective multicenter observational registry (ADVANCE-ICM registry), ICM patients who were eligible for PP ICD were screened ...[more]

PMID: 33107237

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundConventional risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) justify primary prevention through implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients. However, the positive predictive values for these conventional SCD risk factors are low. Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) and midventricular obstruction (MVO) are potential risk modifiers for SCD. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether an elevated intraventricular pressure gradient (IVPG), including LVOTO or MVO, is a potential risk modifier for SCD and ventricular arrhythmias requiring ICD interventions in addition to the conventional risk factors among HCM patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 60 HCM patients who received ICDs for primary prevention. An elevated IVPG was defined as a peak instantaneous gradient ≥ 30 mmHg at rest, as detected by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography. The main outcome was a composite of SCD and appropriate ICD interventions, which were defined as an antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the relationships between risk factors and the occurrence of SCD and appropriate ICD interventions.ResultsThirty patients met the criteria of elevated IVPG (50%). During the median follow-up period of 66 months, 2 patients experienced SCD, and 10 patients received appropriate ICD interventions. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the incidence of the main outcome was higher in patients with an IVPG ≥ 30 mmHg than in those without an IVPG ≥ 30 mmHg (log-rank P = 0.03). There were no differences in the main outcome between patients with LVOTO and patients with MVO. The combination of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) and IVPG ≥ 30 mmHg was found to significantly increase the risk of the main outcome (HR 6.31, 95% CI 1.36-29.25, P = 0.02). Five patients experienced ICD implant-related complications.ConclusionsOur findings showed that a baseline IVPG ≥ 30 mmHg was associated with an increased risk of experiencing SCD or appropriate ICD interventions among HCM patients who received ICDs for primary prevention. Combined with NSVT, which is a conventional risk factor, a baseline IVPG ≥ 30 mmHg may be a potential modifier of SCD risk in HCM patients.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in selected patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction by delivering therapies (antitachycardia pacing or shocks) to terminate potentially lethal arrhythmias; inappropriate therapies also occur. We assessed device therapies among adults receiving primary prevention ICDs in 7 healthcare systems. METHODS AND RESULTS:We linked medical record data, adjudicated device therapies, and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry. Survival analysis evaluated therapy probability and predictors after ICD implant from 2006 to 2009, with attention to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development subgroups: left ventricular ejection fraction, 31% to 35%; nonischemic cardiomyopathy <9 months' duration; and New York Heart Association class IV heart failure with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator. Among 2540 patients, 35% were <65 years old, 26% were women, and 59% were white. During 27 (median) months, 738 (29%) received ?1 therapy. Three-year therapy risk was 36% (appropriate, 24%; inappropriate, 12%). Appropriate therapy was more common in men (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-2.35). Inappropriate therapy was more common in patients with atrial fibrillation (adjusted HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.68-2.87), but less common among patients ?65 years old versus younger (adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.95) and in recent implants (eg, in 2009 versus 2006; adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.95). In Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development analysis, inappropriate therapy was less common with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator versus single chamber (adjusted HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36-0.84); therapy risk did not otherwise differ for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development subgroups. CONCLUSIONS:In this community cohort of primary prevention patients receiving ICD, therapy delivery varied across demographic and clinical characteristics, but did not differ meaningfully for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Coverage With Evidence Development subgroups.

Project description:BackgroundGlobal electrical heterogeneity (GEH) is associated with sudden cardiac death in the general population. Its utility in patients with systolic heart failure who are candidates for primary prevention (PP) implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is unclear.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether GEH is associated with sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation leading to appropriate ICD therapies in patients with heart failure and PP ICDs.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study. GEH was measured by spatial ventricular gradient (SVG) direction (azimuth and elevation) and magnitude, QRS-T angle, and sum absolute QRST integral on preimplant 12-lead electrocardiograms. Survival analysis using cause-specific hazard functions compared the strength of associations with 2 competing outcomes: sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation leading to appropriate ICD therapies and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapies.ResultsWe analyzed 2668 patients (mean age 63 ± 12 years; 624 (23%) female; 78% white; 43% nonischemic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular ejection fraction 28% ± 11% from 6 academic medical centers). After adjustment for demographic, clinical, device, and traditional electrocardiographic characteristics, SVG elevation (hazard ratio [HR] per 1SD 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.25; P = .004), SVG azimuth (HR per 1SD 1.12; 95% CI 1.01-1.24; P = .039), SVG magnitude (HR per 1SD 0.75; 95% CI 0.66-0.85; P < .0001), and QRS-T angle (HR per 1SD 1.21; 95% CI 1.08-1.36; P = .001) were associated with appropriate ICD therapies. Sum absolute QRST integral had different associations in infarct-related cardiomyopathy (HR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.60) and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.96) (Pinteraction = .022).ConclusionIn patients with PP ICDs, GEH is independently associated with appropriate ICD therapies. The SVG vector points in distinctly different directions in patients with 2 competing outcomes.

Dataset Information

Clinical and Hospital Factors Affecting Treatment with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients.

Publications

Clinical and Hospital Factors Affecting Treatment with Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets