Dataset Information

Activity of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Prostate Cancer With and Without DNA Repair Gene Aberrations.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

DNA repair gene aberrations occur in 20% to 30% of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and some of these aberrations have been associated with sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition platinum-based treatments. However, previous trials assessing platinum-based treatments in patients with CRPC have mostly included a biomarker-unselected population; therefore, efficacy in these patients is unknown.

Objective

To characterize the antitumor activity of platinum-based therapies in men with CRPC with or without DNA repair gene alterations.

Design, setting, and participants

In this case series, data from 508 patients with CRPC treated with platinum-based therapy were collected from 25 academic centers from 12 countries worldwide. Patients were grouped by status of DNA repair gene aberrations (ie, cohort 1, present; cohort 2, not detected; and cohort 3, not tested). Data were collected from January 1986 to December 2018. Data analysis was performed in 2019, with data closure in April 2019.

Exposure

Treatment with platinum-based compounds either as monotherapy or combination therapy.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary end points were as follows: (1) antitumor activity of platinum-based therapy, defined as a decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of at least 50% and/or radiological soft tissue response in patients with measurable disease and (2) the association of response with the presence or absence of DNA repair gene aberrations.

Results

A total of 508 men with a median (range) age of 61 (27-88) years were included in this analysis. DNA repair gene aberrations were present in 80 patients (14.7%; cohort 1), absent in 98 (19.3%; cohort 2), and not tested in 330 (65.0%; cohort 3). Of 408 patients who received platinum-based combination therapy, 338 patients (82.8%) received docetaxel, paclitaxel, or etoposide, and 70 (17.2%) received platinum-based combination treatment with another partner. A PSA level decrease of at least 50% was seen in 33 patients (47.1%) in cohort 1 and 26 (36.1%) in cohort 2 (P = .20). In evaluable patients, soft tissue responses were documented in 28 of 58 patients (48.3%) in cohort 1 and 21 of 67 (31.3%) in cohort 2 (P = .07). In the subgroup of 44 patients with BRCA2 gene alterations, PSA level decreases of at least 50% were documented in 23 patients (63.9%) and soft tissue responses in 17 of 34 patients (50.0%) with evaluable disease. In cohort 3, PSA level decreases of at least 50% and soft tissue responses were documented in 81 of 284 patients (28.5%) and 38 of 185 patients (20.5%) with evaluable disease, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance

In this study, platinum-based treatment was associated with relevant antitumor activity in a biomarker-positive population of patients with advanced prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations. The findings of this study suggest that platinum-based treatment may be considered an option for these patients.

SUBMITTER: Schmid S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7593810 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Platinum-based chemotherapy (PC) and immunotherapy plus platinum-based chemotherapy (IPC) remain the first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. But only a minority patients benefit from PC, and existing biomarkers, such as PD-L1, have been shown to be defective in predicting the efficacy of IPC. Highlighting the need to identify novel biomarkers for the efficacy of PC and IPC. DNA damage repair (DDR) mutations are known to predict response to PC in solid tumors. However, the predictive value of DDR in PC and IPC of NSCLC remains unclear. Methods Patients diagnosed with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were retrospectively included if they underwent next generation sequencing prior to starting treatment. Primary endpoints were to explore whether DDR mutations (DDRmut) are associated with clinical outcomes of PC and IPC. Secondary end point were to explore the association between DDRmut and the choice to add immunotherapy to chemotherapy, and the impact of different DDR pathways on efficacy in PC and IPC. Results DDRmut showed a strong association with tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) versus DDR wild-type (DDRwt) and higher rates of PD-L1 TPS ≥50% positivity. In 63 patients treated with PC, ORRs were 15.38% and 2.86% for DDRmut and DDRwt subgroup (P=0.1536), and DCRs were 88.46% and 45.72% (P=0.00097) at 6 months after PC. The DDRmut patients had significantly improved median PFS (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) than DDRwt group (mPFS: 7.6 vs. 3.9 months, HR =1.93, 95% CI: 1.09 to 3.14, P=0.0220. mOS: 29.9 vs. 20.7 months, HR =2.31, 95% CI: 1.09 to 4.9, P=0.0250). Moreover, among 37 patients treated with IPC, ORRs were 45% and 11.76% for DDRmut and DDRwt patients (P=0.0365), and the DCRs were 95% and 70.58% (P=0.0752), respectively at 6 months after IPC. The DDRmut patients had significantly improved mPFS compared to the DDRwt group (19.5 vs. 4.5 months, HR =3.28, 95% CI: 1.53 to 9.56, P=0.0022). In DDRmut group, mPFS of IPC recipients was significantly better than that of PC recipients (19.5 vs. 7.6 months, HR =2.09, 95% CI: 0.98 to 4.42, P=0.050). Conclusions There is potential for DDR to serve as a positive predictor of PC and IPC in advanced NSCLC patients.

Project description:Expression of the DNA/RNA helicase schlafen family member 11 (SLFN11) has been identified as a sensitizer of tumor cells to DNA-damaging agents including platinum chemotherapy. We assessed the impact of SLFN11 expression on response to platinum chemotherapy and outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Tumor expression of SLFN11 was assessed in 41 patients with CRPC treated with platinum chemotherapy by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of metastatic biopsy tissue (n = 27) and/or immunofluorescence in circulating tumor cells (CTC; n = 20). Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to evaluate the association of SLFN11 expression with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis included tumor histology (i.e., adenocarcinoma or neuroendocrine) and the presence or absence of DNA repair aberrations. Patient-derived organoids with SLFN11 expression and after knockout by CRISPR-Cas9 were treated with platinum and assessed for changes in dose response. Patients were treated with platinum combination (N = 38) or platinum monotherapy (N = 3). Median lines of prior therapy for CRPC was two. Median OS was 8.7 months. Overexpression of SLFN11 in metastatic tumors by RNA-seq was associated with longer rPFS compared with those without overexpression (6.9 vs. 2.8 months, HR = 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.56-8.87; P < 0.001); similar results were observed for patients with SLFN11-positive versus SLFN11-negative CTCs (rPFS 6.0 vs. 2.2 months, HR = 4.02; 95% CI, 0.77-20.86; P = 0.002). A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥50% was observed in all patients with SLFN11 overexpression. No association was observed between SLFN11 expression and OS. On multivariable analysis, SLFN11 was an independent factor associated with rPFS on platinum therapy. Platinum response of organoids expressing SLFN11 was reduced after SLFN11 knockout. Our data suggest that SLFN11 expression might identify patients with CRPC with a better response to platinum chemotherapy independent of histology or other genomic alterations. Additional studies, also in the context of PARP inhibitors, are warranted.