Dataset Information

COVID-19 is associated with clinically significant weight loss and risk of malnutrition, independent of hospitalisation: A post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may associate with clinical manifestations, ranging from alterations in smell and taste to severe respiratory distress requiring intensive care, that might associate with weight loss and malnutrition. We aimed to assess the incidence of unintentional weight loss and malnutrition in COVID-19 survivors.

Methods

In this post-hoc analysis of a prospective observational cohort study, we enrolled all adult (age ≥18 years) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 who had been discharged home from either a medical ward or the Emergency Department of San Raffaele University Hospital, and were re-evaluated after remission at the Outpatient COVID-19 Follow-Up Clinic of the same Institution from April 7, 2020, to May 11, 2020. Demographic, anthropometric, clinical and biochemical parameters upon admission were prospectively collected. At follow-up, anthropometrics, the mini nutritional assessment screening and a visual analogue scale for appetite were assessed.

Results

A total of 213 patients were included in the analysis (33% females, median age 59.0 [49.5-67.9] years, 70% overweight/obese upon initial assessment, 73% hospitalised). Sixty-one patients (29% of the total, and 31% of hospitalised patients vs. 21% of patients managed at home, p = 0.14) had lost >5% of initial body weight (median weight loss 6.5 [5.0-9.0] kg, or 8.1 [6.1-10.9]%). Patients who lost weight had greater systemic inflammation (C-reactive protein 62.9 [29.0-129.5] vs.48.7 [16.1-96.3] mg/dL; p = 0.02), impaired renal function (23.7% vs. 8.7% of patients; p = 0.003) and longer disease duration (32 [27-41] vs. 24 [21-30] days; p = 0.047) as compared with those who did not lose weight. At multivariate logistic regression analysis, only disease duration independently predicted weight loss (OR 1.05 [1.01-1.10] p = 0.022).

Conclusions

COVID-19 might negatively impact body weight and nutritional status. In COVID-19 patients, nutritional evaluation, counselling and treatment should be implemented at initial assessment, throughout the course of disease, and after clinical remission. CLINICALTRIALS.

Gov registration

NCT04318366.

SUBMITTER: Di Filippo L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7598735 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThe prevalence and optimal management of clinically significant pleural effusion, confirmed by thoracic ultrasound, in the critically ill is unknown. This study aimed to determine: 1) the prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated in intensive care with clinically significant effusion and 2) the comparative efficacy and safety of pleural drainage or expectant medical management.DesignA prospective multicenter cohort study.SettingICUs in four teaching hospitals in Western Australia.PatientsConsecutive patients with clinically significant pleural effusions (depth ≥ 2 cm on thoracic ultrasound with clinician-determined adverse effects on patient progress).InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsPrimary outcome was the change in Pao2:Fio2 (mm Hg) ratio from baseline to 24 hours. Changes in diagnosis and treatment based on pleural fluid analysis and pleural effusion related serious adverse events between those who underwent either drainage within 24 hours or expectant management were compared. Of the 7,342 patients screened, 226 patients (3.1%) with 300 pleural effusions were enrolled. Early drainage of pleural effusion occurred in 76 patients (34%) and significantly improved oxygenation (Pao2:Fio2 ratio 203 at baseline vs 263 at 24 hr, +29.6% increment; p < 0.01). This was not observed in the other 150 patients who had expectant management (Pao2:Fio2 ratio 250 at baseline vs 268 at 24 hr, +7.2% increment; p = 0.44). The improvement in oxygenation after early drainage remained unchanged after adjustment for a propensity score on the decision to initiate early drainage. Pleural effusion related serious adverse events were not different between the two groups (early drainage 10.5% vs no early drainage 16.0%; p = 0.32). Improvements in diagnosis were noted in 91 initial (nonrepetitive) drainages (76.5% out of 119); treatment strategy was optimized after 80 drainage episodes (59.7% out of 134).ConclusionsEarly drainage of clinically significant pleural effusion was associated with improved oxygenation and diagnostic accuracy without increased complications.

Project description:To determine whether an anabolic drug (sprifermin) is capable of reducing cartilage loss wherever it occurs in a given knee, using a subject-specific, location-independent analysis of cartilage change in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).Study participants (n?=?168; ages ?40 years, 69% women) had symptomatic femorotibial OA not confined to the medial compartment. Sprifermin (10, 30, or 100 ?g) or placebo was injected intraarticularly 3 times over 3 weeks, both after randomization (baseline) and 3 months later. Coronal magnetic resonance images were acquired at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. The femorotibial cartilage of each subject was segmented, and changes in cartilage thickness were computed across 16 subregions. Location-independent post hoc analysis was used to compute summary scores of negative and positive changes in the subregions, summarized as the total cartilage thinning sum score (ThCTnS) and the total cartilage thickening sum score (ThCTkS), capturing change in either direction in each knee. Ordered values of the magnitude of subject-specific subregional changes in thickness were determined. The ThCTnS and ThCTkS in each sprifermin dose group at 12 months of followup were compared with the values in the matched placebo groups, using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test.The mean?±?SD ThCTnS was -591?±?617 ?m (median -360 ?m, Q1/Q3?=?-820/-200 ?m) in patients treated with 100 ?g sprifermin (n?=?57), and -921?±?777 ?m (median -745 ?m, Q1/Q3?=?-1,190/-380 ?m) in patients given placebo (n?=?18). The mean difference in the ThCTnS between the 100-?g sprifermin group and the placebo group was 331 ?m (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 24, 685), a difference that was statistically significant (P?=?0.03). The mean difference in the ThCTkS in the 100-?g sprifermin group compared with the placebo group was 237 ?m (95% CI 34, 440), also a statistically significant difference (P?=?0.028).Sprifermin not only increases cartilage thickness, but also reduces cartilage loss. Subject-specific, location-independent analysis of both cartilage thinning and thickening represents a sensitive and informative approach for studying the effects of disease-modifying OA drugs.

Project description:Abstract Background: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, is being investigated in people with overweight or obesity. A post-hoc analysis of the STEP 4 trial was conducted to identify whether early weight loss is predictive of later weight loss with maintenance once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 2.4 mg. Methods: STEP 4 was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 withdrawal trial (NCT03548987). Adults aged ≥18 years with either body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2 with ≥1 weight-related comorbidity or BMI ≥30 kg/m2, without type 2 diabetes, underwent a 20-week run-in period. Participants reaching the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 (regardless of weight loss achieved) were randomized 2:1 to semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo, as adjunct to lifestyle intervention, for an additional 48 weeks. Percent change in body weight from week 0 to 68 was estimated using a mixed model for repeated measurements analysis with treatment, week 20 responder status, and the interaction between treatment and week 20 responder status as factors, and baseline body weight as a covariate, all nested within visit (based on the trial product estimand [treatment effect assuming treatment adherence and without use of rescue intervention] for the on-treatment period). Participants were considered responders if they achieved ≥5% weight loss at week 20. Whether the week 20 response to semaglutide predicted the achievement of clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) by week 68 was also assessed. Results: In STEP 4, 902 participants initiated semaglutide at week 0, of whom 803 were randomized at week 20 (semaglutide: n=535, placebo: n=268; characteristics at week 0 for all randomized participants: mean age 46 years, body weight 107.2 kg, BMI 38.4 kg/m2; 79.0% female; 83.7% white). For the 88.0% of participants randomized to semaglutide and who were responders at week 20, mean body weight change from week 0 to 68 was -19.7%. For non-responders at week 20, mean body weight change was -6.4% with continued semaglutide vs -0.3% with switch to placebo. Of all participants randomized to semaglutide, 86.2% achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss (≥5%) at week 68. Being a responder at week 20 was highly predictive of achieving this outcome (positive predictive value: 96.4%), whereas being a non-responder at week 20 had limited predictive value (negative predictive value: 42.9%). Conclusion: In the STEP 4 trial, the vast majority of participants who were randomized to the maintenance dose of once-weekly s.c. semaglutide 2.4 mg at week 20 had lost ≥5% body weight by week 68, with most achieving this by week 20. Overall weight loss with semaglutide was greater among early responders, but non-responders also achieved a clinically-relevant weight loss by week 68 if semaglutide treatment was continued.