Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Redefining the Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin in COVID-19 Patients: The Importance of Concomitant Coronary Artery Disease.


ABSTRACT: Although studies assessing cardiovascular comorbidities and myocardial injury in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have been published, no reports focused on clinical outcomes of myocardial injury in patients with and without chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) are currently available. In this study, consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to four different institutions were screened for enrolment. Patients were divided into two groups (CCS vs. no-CCS). Association with in-hospital mortality and related predictors represented the main study outcome; myocardial injury and its predictors were deemed secondary outcomes. A total of 674 COVID-19 patients were enrolled, 112 (16.6%) with an established history of CCS. Myocardial injury occurred in 43.8% patients with CCS vs. 14.4% patients without CCS, as confirmed by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) elevation on admission or during hospitalization. The mortality rate in the CCS cohort was nearly three-fold higher. After adjusting for disease severity, myocardial injury resulted significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in the no-CCS group but not in CCS patients. Patients with CCS and COVID-19 showed high mortality rate. Myocardial injury may be a bystander in CCS patients and COVID-19, while in patients without known history of CCS, myocardial injury has a significant role in predicting poor outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Schiavone M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7601151 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications


<h4>Background</h4>Although studies assessing cardiovascular comorbidities and myocardial injury in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have been published, no reports focused on clinical outcomes of myocardial injury in patients with and without chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) are currently available.<h4>Methods</h4>In this study, consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to four different institutions were screened for enrolment. Patients were divided into two groups (CCS vs. no-CCS). A  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9628166 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5866325 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11921317 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8301217 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7766903 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7696893 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9246661 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7253774 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8426962 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5536845 | biostudies-literature