Dataset Information

Multifocal ERG and Microperimetry Changes in Response to Ranibizumab Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Randomized Phase 2 Open-Label Study.

ABSTRACT: Purpose:To compare monthly versus pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab injections in the treatment of exudative macular degeneration (AMD) while assessing the utility of microperimetry (MP) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) testing when monitoring response to treatment. Methods:A randomized exploratory trial comparing the efficacy of monthly versus PRN dosing of ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 2.0 mg) for patients with exudative AMD over 12 months. High-resolution optical coherence tomography (HR-OCT) studies were used to guide PRN treatment and any cystic spaces or subretinal fluid prompted retreatment. Macular function was assessed using mean sensitivity on MP and N1-P1 response density on mfERG. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters and anatomic response assessed with central foveal thickness (CFT) using HR-OCT studies. Results:The 12-month study was completed by 43 patients in the PRN cohort and 33 patients in the monthly cohort. Mean BCVA improved by 6.0 ± 1.3 ETDRS letters in the PRN cohort compared to 7.3 ± 2.8 ETDRS letters in the monthly cohort (p=0.68). A reduction in mean CFT of 64.5 ± 13.3 and 96.3 ± 22.0 µm occurred in the PRN and monthly cohorts, respectively (p=0.22). Macular function assessed with mfERG decreased comparably in both the PRN and monthly cohorts (p=0.33). For all patients, average mean sensitivity significantly improved by 1.7 ± 0.5 dB (p<0.05) and N1-P1 response density significantly decreased by 0.52 ± 0.21 nV/deg2 (p<0.05). Conclusion:Both PRN and monthly treatment of exudative AMD with ranibizumab improve visual function as assessed by BCVA and MP. Macular thickening also improved as demonstrated by HR-OCT findings. However, the decreased retinal function noted by mfERG suggests that some loss of retinal function still occurs despite effective treatment. These measures of visual function may be useful in assessing retinal health and response to treatment in future clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Asahi MG

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7605973 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Multifocal ERG and Microperimetry Changes in Response to Ranibizumab Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Randomized Phase 2 Open-Label Study.

Asahi Masumi G MG Wallsh Josh J Onishi Spencer M SM Kuroyama Shari S Gallemore Ron P RP

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 20201029

<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare monthly versus pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab injections in the treatment of exudative macular degeneration (AMD) while assessing the utility of microperimetry (MP) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) testing when monitoring response to treatment.<h4>Methods</h4>A randomized exploratory trial comparing the efficacy of monthly versus PRN dosing of ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 2.0 mg) for patients with exudative AMD over 12 months. High-resolution optical coherence tomog ...[more]

PMID: 33154619

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundClinical trials have established the efficacy of ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In addition, bevacizumab is used off-label to treat AMD, despite the absence of similar supporting data.MethodsIn a multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned 1208 patients with neovascular AMD to receive intravitreal injections of ranibizumab or bevacizumab on either a monthly schedule or as needed with monthly evaluation. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity at 1 year, with a noninferiority limit of 5 letters on the eye chart.ResultsBevacizumab administered monthly was equivalent to ranibizumab administered monthly, with 8.0 and 8.5 letters gained, respectively. Bevacizumab administered as needed was equivalent to ranibizumab as needed, with 5.9 and 6.8 letters gained, respectively. Ranibizumab as needed was equivalent to monthly ranibizumab, although the comparison between bevacizumab as needed and monthly bevacizumab was inconclusive. The mean decrease in central retinal thickness was greater in the ranibizumab-monthly group (196 μm) than in the other groups (152 to 168 μm, P=0.03 by analysis of variance). Rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were similar for patients receiving either bevacizumab or ranibizumab (P>0.20). The proportion of patients with serious systemic adverse events (primarily hospitalizations) was higher with bevacizumab than with ranibizumab (24.1% vs. 19.0%; risk ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.66), with excess events broadly distributed in disease categories not identified in previous studies as areas of concern.ConclusionsAt 1 year, bevacizumab and ranibizumab had equivalent effects on visual acuity when administered according to the same schedule. Ranibizumab given as needed with monthly evaluation had effects on vision that were equivalent to those of ranibizumab administered monthly. Differences in rates of serious adverse events require further study. (Funded by the National Eye Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00593450.).

Dataset Information

Multifocal ERG and Microperimetry Changes in Response to Ranibizumab Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Randomized Phase 2 Open-Label Study.

Publications

Multifocal ERG and Microperimetry Changes in Response to Ranibizumab Treatment of Neovascular AMD: Randomized Phase 2 Open-Label Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets