Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: An analysis of the SEER database.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Campos-Balea B
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7606019 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: An analysis of the SEER database.
Campos-Balea Begoña B de Castro Carpeño Javier J Massutí Bartomeu B Vicente-Baz David D Pérez Parente Diego D Ruiz-Gracia Pedro P Crama Leonardo L Cobo Dols Manuel M
Thoracic cancer 20200928 11
<h4>Background</h4>Lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) is the main cause of death related to lung cancer. The aim of this study was to identify poor prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) in patients with stage IV lung ADC in real-world clinical practice.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients were selected from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Chi-square bivariate analysis was used for the association of binary qualitative variables. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was perform ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background:The goal of this study is to assess the newest survival of hepatoblastoma (HB) and the risk factors which impacted on survival by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, also calculate the incidence of HB in recent years. Methods:We calculate age-adjusted incidence of HB by using SEER 21 registries. Age, sex, race, tumor size, macrovascular involvement, multifocal tumor, distant metastasis, the way of treatment, and the survival were collected for survival and analysis of prognostic factors in SEER 18 registries. Survival curves, according to different factors, were obtained by Kaplan-Meier estimates. Multivariable Cox regression models were also built. Results:The overall age-adjusted incidence of HB was 0.19 patients per 100,000 children with a statistically significant increase per year. Overall survival (OS) at 1-, 3- and 5-year for all patients were 89.3%, 84.6%, and 81.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed tumor size >5 cm [hazard ratio (HR), 8.271; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.134-60.310], multiple tumors (HR, 2.578; 95% CI, 1.424-4.668) and no-surgery treatment (HR, 7.520; 95% CI, 4.121-13.724) were independent indicators of poor prognosis. Only the age ?2-year-old (HR, 3.240; 95% CI, 1.433-7.326) and multiple tumors (HR, 2.395; 95% CI, 1.057-5.430) were the risk factors for the surgical treatment group. Conclusions:The survival of patients with HB has been greatly improved in the recent years, and at the same time, due to the application of better chemotherapy, we should re-evaluate the traditional risk indicators of prognosis in order to better apply to the clinical.
| S-EPMC6861810 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The prognosis of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (MLUAD) varies greatly. At present, no studies have constructed a satisfactory prognostic model for MLUAD. We identified 44,878 patients with MLUAD. The patients were randomized into the training and validation cohorts. Cox regression models were performed to identify independent prognostic factors. Then, R software was employed to construct a new nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) of patients with MLUAD. Accuracy was assessed by the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration plots. Finally, clinical practicability was examined via decision curve analysis. The OS time range for the included populations was 0 to 107 months, and the median OS was 7.00 months. Nineteen variables were significantly associated with the prognosis, and the top 5 prognostic factors were chemotherapy, grade, age, race and surgery. The nomogram has excellent predictive accuracy and clinical applicability compared to the TNM system (C-index: 0.723 vs 0.534). The C-index values were 0.723 (95% confidence interval: 0.719-0.726) and 0.723 (95% confidence interval: 0.718-0.729) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The area under the curve for 6-, 12-, and 18-month OS was 0.799, 0.764, and 0.750, respectively, in the training cohort and 0.799, 0.762, and 0.746, respectively, in the validation cohort. The calibration plots show good accuracy, and the decision curve analysis values indicate good clinical applicability and effectiveness. The nomogram model constructed with the above 19 prognostic factors is suitable for predicting the OS of MLUAD and has good predictive accuracy and clinical applicability.
| S-EPMC9750683 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant radiotherapy has been shown to improve marginal negative resection and local control of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, whether it improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to analyze the benefits of only surgery, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and surgery plus chemotherapy for OS in patients with non-metastatic PDAC. METHODS:PDAC diagnosed by surgical histopathology in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2016 was selected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the prognosis of patients with different treatments. Cox proportional risk model was used to analyze independent predictors of OS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to analyze the tumor prognosis of different treatment methods. RESULTS:Before PSM analysis, the OS of surgery plus chemotherapy (HRs?=?0.896, 95%CIs, 0.827-0.970; P?=?0.007) were significantly better than the other three treatments for stage T1-3N0M0 PDAC patients. For stage T1-3N?+?M0 patients, adjuvant radiotherapy (HRs?=?0.613, 95% CIs, 0.579-0.649; P?<?0.001) had significantly better OS than surgery plus chemotherapy and neoadjuvant radiotherapy. For stage T4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (HRs?=?0.482, 95% CIs, 0.347-0.670; P?<?0.001) had significantly better OS than surgery plus chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. For stage T4N?+?M0 patients, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (HRs?=?0.338, 95% CIs, 0.215-0.532; P?<?0.001) had significantly longer OS than adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy. Even after PSM, Chemotherapy plus surgery was still the best treatment for T1-3N0M0 patients. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy had the best prognosis among T1-3N?+?M0 patients, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy was the best treatment for T4 patients. CONCLUSIONS:For patients with non-metastatic PDAC, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy were superior to only surgery in OS. For patients with stage T4 non-metastatic PDAC, neoadjuvant radiotherapy had the potential to be strongly recommended over adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery plus chemotherapy. However, neoadjuvant radiotherapy failed to benefit the survival of T1-3N0M0 stage patients, and surgery plus chemotherapy was preferred. For T1-3N?+?M0, neoadjuvant radiotherapy had no obvious advantage over adjuvant radiotherapy or surgery plus chemotherapy in OS, and adjuvant radiotherapy was more recommended.
| S-EPMC7222314 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: High-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare and aggressive variant of bladder cancer. Considering its rarity, its therapeutic management is challenging and not standardized. Methods: We analyzed data extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry to evaluate prognostic factors for high-grade NEC of the bladder. Results: We extracted data on 1134 patients: 77.6% were small cell NEC, 14.6% were NEC, 5.5% were mixed neuro-endocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasia, and 2.3% were large cell NEC. The stage at diagnosis was localized for 45% of patients, lymph nodal disease (N+M0) for 9.2% of patients, and metastatic disease for 26.1% of patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 12 months. Multivariate analysis detected that factors associated with worse OS were age being >72 years old (HR 1.94), lymph nodal involvement (HR 2.01), metastatic disease (HR 2.04), and the size of the primary tumor being >44.5 mm (HR 1.80). In the N0M0 populations, the size of the primary tumor being <44.5 mm, age being <72 years old, and major surgery were independently associated with a lower risk of death. In the N+M0 group, the size of the primary lesion was the only factor to retain an association with OS. Conclusions: Our SEER database analysis evidenced prognostic factors for high-grade NEC of the bladder that are of pivotal relevance to guide treatment and the decision-making process.
| S-EPMC9406377 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Current reports on prognostic factors for chondrosarcoma mainly involve patients in treatment centers. Few are based on multicenter or multi-eras. We analyzed existing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate the risk factors for survival outcomes. All patients with chondrosarcoma from 1973 to 2012 were identified. 3737 patients were eligible and included. In survival analysis, patient had good survival outcome if the patient was female, young, with localized stage, well grade, small tumor size, treated with surgery, while patient was male, old, with distant stage, undifferentiated grade, tumor size?<50?mm, located in vertebral or pelvic bones, underwent radiation had bad survival outcome. Surgery types from having best survival outcomes to worst were local excision, radical excision, amputation, no surgery. 'Well' and 'moderately' grade seems to be suitable for local excision, but 'poorly' and 'undifferentiated' grade suitable for wide local excision. Multivariate COX regression analysis showed year of diagnosis, sex, age of diagnosis, stage, grade, tumor site, surgery, radiation were independent risk factors. Year of diagnosis, sex, age of diagnosis, stage, grade, tumor site, surgery, radiation were independent risk factors. Excision is a better treatment than amputation. Doctors can use wide local excision to treat chondrosarcoma, especially when encountering high grade chondrosarcoma or pelvic chondrosarcoma.
| S-EPMC6303539 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMany real-world studies of patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are restricted to single centers, limiting the generalizability of their insights. This study aimed to identify important population-based predictors for survival in patients diagnosed with mPDAC in a broader setting.MethodsData between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019 were extracted from the Flatiron Health EHR database. Treatment-specific predictive models were generated for patients treated with first-line gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GNP), FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy (gem-mono), and second-line liposomal irinotecan-based regimens. The holdout method was used for cross-validation. Age at diagnosis, sex, BMI, smoking status, and ECOG performance score were included in all models with additional demographic, clinical characteristics, and hematological function assessed for inclusion.ResultsOf the 3625 patients, 43% received GNP, 26% received FOLFIRINOX, 7% received gem-mono, and 23% received other regimens; 40% (n = 1448) advanced to the second line. Among all first-line patients, the following were included in the final model: prior surgery, white blood cell (WBC) counts, serum albumin (SA), liver function tests (LFTs), serum bilirubin, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9, and ascites. Models for patients receiving specific therapies differed from the overall model, GNP (ascites removed), FOLFIRINOX (stage at initial diagnosis added), and gem-mono (LFTs omitted). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), SA, and WBC counts were important predictors of survival among patients treated with second-line liposomal irinotecan. Across all regimens, the strongest predictors of survival were ECOG score, SA, and ALP.ConclusionsIn this real-world study of patients with mPDAC, important population prognostic factors of survival were identified in a large cohort of patients receiving systemic treatment.
| S-EPMC8683530 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo identify prognostic factors and establish nomograms for predicting overall survival (OS) and cause specific survival (CSS) of patients with non-metastatic chondrosarcoma.MethodsWe collected information on patients with non-metastatic chondrosarcoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2005 and 2014, together with data from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2011 to 2016. Variables including patients' baseline demographics (age, race, and gender), tumor characteristics (tumor size and extension, histology subtype, primary site, and American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage), therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), and socioeconomic status (SES) were extracted for further analysis. OS and CSS were retrieved as our researching endpoints. Patients from the database were regarded as the training set, and univariate analysis, Lasso regression and multivariate analysis as well as the random forest were used to explore the predictors and establish nomograms. To validate nomograms internally and externally, we applied bootstrapped validation internally with the training dataset, while the dataset for external validation was obtained from the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. We estimated the discriminative ability of nomograms based on Cox proportional hazard regression models by means of calibration curves and the concordance index (C-index) of internal and external validation.ResultsAfter the implementation of exclusion criteria, there were 1267 patients in the training set and 72 patients in the testing set with non-metastatic chondrosarcomas. Age, gender, grade, histological subtype, primary site, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, being employed/unemployed, tumor size, and tumor extension were significantly associated with prognosis in the univariate analysis. Age, gender, tumor size and extension, primary site, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, histological grade, and subtype were independent prognostic factors in the Cox models. The C-index of nomograms (internal: OS, 0.787; CSS, 0.821; external: OS, 0.777; CSS, 0.821) were higher than following conventional systems: AJCC sixth (OS, 0.640; CSS, 0.673) and seventh edition (OS, 0.675; CSS, 0.711).ConclusionsAge, gender, tumor size and extension, surgery, histological grade, and subtype were independent prognostic factors for both OS and CSS. In addition, we revealed that chondrosarcomas in the trunk, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were correlated with poor prognosis. Our nomograms based on significant clinicopathologic features can well predict the 3-year and 5-year survival probability of patients with non-metastatic chondrosarcoma and assist oncologists in making accurate survival evaluation.
| S-EPMC6819193 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10912175 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone sarcoma and affects all ages. There are substantial differences in management and outcomes for patients who have localized disease compared with distant spread at the time of diagnosis. Our goal was to examine potential risk factors predictive of metastatic disease at presentation.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database was used to identify all patients diagnosed with osteosarcoma from 2000 to 2008 and to classify each patient as having metastatic or localized disease at the time of diagnosis. Patient-based characteristics, tumor characteristics, and county-level socioeconomic measures were analyzed to determine which factors were predictive of an increased rate of distant metastatic disease at presentation. These factors were analyzed as univariate characteristics as well as in a multivariate logistic regression model.We identified 2017 cases of high-grade osteosarcoma, and 464 (23.0%) of the patients presented with metastatic disease. In the unadjusted logistic regression analysis, patients had increased odds of metastatic disease at presentation if they had an age of sixty years or more (odds ratio [OR] = 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71 to 2.89), had a tumor located in the axial skeleton (OR = 2.47; 95% CI, 1.88 to 3.26), and lived in a county with low socioeconomic status (OR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.08 to 2.35). These factors remained significant when combined in multivariate models controlling for age, location, and socioeconomic status. For patients with recorded tumor size information (n = 1398), the odds of metastasis at presentation increased by 10% with each additional centimeter of tumor size (OR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.13). When the patients with missing tumor size information were excluded, socioeconomic status was no longer a significant risk factor for metastasis at presentation in the multivariate model.Osteosarcoma patients with advanced age, a tumor in the axial skeleton, a larger tumor size, and a residence in a less affluent county were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation.
| S-EPMC3689260 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundRhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft-tissue sarcomas in children. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors of pelvic and genitourinary RMS in children and evaluate the survival outcomes of these children treated with or without radiation therapy (RT).MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database was required for children with pelvic and genitourinary RMS. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses.ResultsFor the 262 patients analyzed, the most common biological subtypes were embryonic (n=209, 79.8%) and alveolar (n=29, 11.1%). Patients with alveolar RMS had the worst prognosis (P < 0.05). The testis (n=122, 46.6%) was the most common location, followed by the urinary bladder (n=57, 21.8%) and prostate (n=48, 18.3%). Uterus RMS had the highest survival rate, followed by testis, urinary bladder, and prostate RMS. Favorable prognostic factors were age at diagnosis < 15 years, non-alveolar histological subtype, early tumor stage (localized/regional), specific sites (uterus and testis), and treatment (cancer-directed surgery and chemotherapy) (P < 0.05). Propensity score-matched analyses comparing the cohorts of patients treated with or without RT demonstrated no significant differences in prognostic survival (OS: P=0.872, CSS: P=0.713).ConclusionThe nomogram constructed based on independent prognostic factors may accurately predict survival rates at 1 and 5 years. Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can be effective treatments, but RT fails to guarantee a survival benefit. Therefore, prospective trials evaluating RT for pediatric pelvic and genitourinary RMS are warranted.
| S-EPMC9483154 | biostudies-literature