Dataset Information

A comparison of the Avisoft (v.5.2) and MATLAB Mouse Song Analyzer (v.1.3) vocalization analysis systems in C57BL/6, Fmr1-FVB.129, NS-Pten-FVB, and 129 mice.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Communicative behaviors play a vital role in mammals and are highly relevant to human neurodevelopmental conditions. Mice produce communicative vocalizations that occur in the ultrasonic range, which are commonly analyzed within the Avisoft recording system. Fully automated programs such as the Mouse Song Analyzer in MATLAB, have been developed to analyze USVs in a shorter time period, however, no study has compared the accuracy of MATLAB to Avisoft.

New method

In order to determine MATLAB's accuracy, we used data from four different mouse strains and assessed whether the total number of USVs detected was similar between systems.

Results

We found that there was a high correlation between systems for the number of USVs emitted from C57BL/6 and NS-Pten mice however, Avisoft detected significantly more USVs than MATLAB for both strains. For Fmr1-FVB.129 and 129 mice, large correlations were observed between systems and no significant difference was present in the USVs detected. A partial correlation was run to control for the covariates: sex, age, strain, and treatment, and found that only strain substantially influences the relationship between the USVs detected in Avisoft and those detected in MATLAB.

Comparison with existing method

These findings demonstrate that there is a high degree of agreement between Avisoft and the Mouse Song Analyzer however, Avisoft does detect significantly more USVs depending on the strain assessed.

Conclusions

Therefore, there are relative advantages and disadvantages with both systems that vocalization researchers should be aware of when interpreting USV results, and when using either system.

SUBMITTER: Binder M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7606442 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The prevalence of seizures in individuals with fragile X syndrome (FXS) is ~25%; however, there are no reports of spontaneous seizures in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of FXS. Herein, we report that 48% of adult (median age P96), Fmr1 knockout mice from our colony were found expired in their home cages. We observed and recorded adult Fmr1 knockout mice having spontaneous convulsions in their home cages. In addition, we captured by electroencephalography an adult Fmr1 knockout mouse having a spontaneous seizure-during preictal, ictal, and postictal phases-which confirmed the presence of a generalized seizure. We did not observe this phenotype in control conspecifics or in juvenile (age <P35) Fmr1 knockout mice. We hypothesized that chronic, random, noise perturbations during development caused the phenotype. We recorded decibels (dB) in our vivarium. The average was 61 dB, but operating the automatic door to the vivarium caused spikes to 95 dB. We modified the door to eliminate noise spikes, which reduced unexpected deaths to 33% in Fmr1 knockout mice raised from birth in this environment (P = 0.07). As the modifications did not eliminate unexpected deaths, we further hypothesized that building vibrations may also be a contributing factor. After installing anti-vibration pads underneath housing carts, unexpected deaths of Fmr1 knockout mice born and raised in this environment decreased to 29% (P < 0.01 compared to the original environment). We also observed significant sex effects, for example, after interventions to reduce sound and vibration, significantly fewer male, but not female, Fmr1 knockout mice died unexpectedly (P < 0.001). The spontaneous seizure phenotype in our Fmr1 knockout mice could serve as a model of seizures observed in individuals with FXS, potentially offering a new translationally-valid phenotype for FXS research. Finally, these observations, although anomalous, serve as a reminder to consider gene-environment interactions when interpreting data derived from Fmr1 knockout mice.