Assessment of nanoindentation in stiffness measurement of soft biomaterials: kidney, liver, spleen and uterus.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wu G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7606463 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Background and aimsLiver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) are two most widely accessible non-invasive parameters for predicting esophageal varices (EV), but the reported accuracy of the two predictors have been inconsistent across studies. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LS and SS measurement for detecting EV in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), and compare their accuracy.MethodsPubmed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Ovid were searched for all studies assessing SS and LS simultaneously in EV diagnosis. A total of 16 studies including 1892 patients were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled statistical parameters were calculated using the bivariate mixed effects models.ResultsIn detection of any EV, for LS measurement, the summary sensitivity was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.87), and the specificity was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.60-0.72). While for SS measurement, the pooled sensitivity and specificity was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.83-0.92) and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve values of LS and SS were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) respectively, and the results had statistical significance (P<0.01). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of SS (25.73) was significantly higher than that of LS (9.54), with the relative DOR value was 2.48 (95%CI: 1.10-5.60), P<0.05.ConclusionsUnder current techniques, SS is significantly superior to LS for identifying the presence of EV in patients with CLD. SS measurement may help to select patients for endoscopic screening.
| S-EPMC5102398 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimLiver stiffness measurement (LSM) and spleen stiffness measurement (SSM@50 Hz) using standard vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) have been studied as a noninvasive test for screening of gastroesophageal varices (GEV) in chronic liver disease (CLD). Recently, a novel spleen-dedicated VCTE (SSM@100 Hz) has been developed. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of SSM@100 Hz, SSM@50 Hz, LSM, and other noninvasive tests using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the reference as well as the correlation with hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG).MethodsA total of 123 patients with CLD enrolled in this cross-sectional study. SSM@100 Hz, SSM@50 Hz, and LSM were determined by VCTE. EGD and HVPG were performed within 12 weeks before or after VCTE.ResultsGEV were present in 60 patients. Failure or suboptimal SSM were fewer at 100 Hz (4.0%) than at 50 Hz (17.7%). All SSM values obtained at 100 Hz were lower than the 100 kPa ceiling threshold, but 10 patients reached the 75 kPa ceiling threshold for SSM@50 Hz. SSM@100 Hz was most accurate (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] = 0.944) for the diagnosis of GEV compared to SSM@50 Hz, LSM, and scoring systems. AUROC of SSM@100 Hz for diagnosis of high-bleeding risk varices (HRV) was 0.941, which was significantly higher than that of SSM@50 Hz (AUROC = 0.842, P = 0.002). SSM@100 Hz showed higher specificity (82.0%) for diagnosis of HRV than SSM@50 Hz (specificity = 67.1%). SSM@100 Hz was significantly correlated with HVPG (r = 0.71, P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe novel spleen-dedicated VCTE examination can be used for noninvasive assessment of GEV and HVPG in CLD. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Registry No. jRCTs032200119.
| S-EPMC8762624 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background & aimsBoth liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) are widely used to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and portal hypertension, respectively. We aimed to identify the impact of disease etiology, namely the localization of inflammation (portal vs. lobular), on the SS/LS ratio.MethodsIn this multicenter study, LS and SS were prospectively assessed in 411 patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) using FibroScan® (Echosens, Paris); changes in these parameters were also studied in response to treatment (alcohol withdrawal, HCV therapy). LS and spleen length (SL) were further analyzed in a retrospective cohort of 449 patients with long-term data on decompensation/death.ResultsBoth, SS and SL were significantly higher in HCV compared to ALD (42.0 vs. 32.6 kPa, p≪0.0001, 15.6 vs. 11.9 cm, p≪0.0001) despite a lower mean LS in HCV. Consequently, the SS to LS ratio and the SL to LS ratio were significantly higher in HCV (3.8 vs. 1.72 and 1.46 vs. 0.86, p≪0.0001) through all fibrosis stages. Notably, SL linearly increased with SS and the relation between SS and SL was identical in HCV and ALD. In contrast, livers were much larger in ALD at comparable LS. After treatment, LS significantly decreased in both diseases without significant changes to the SS/LS ratio. In the prognostic cohort, patients with ALD had higher LS values (30.5 vs. 21.3 kPa) and predominantly presented with jaundice (65.2%); liver failure was the major cause of death (p≪0.01). In contrast, in HCV, spleens were larger (17.6 vs. 12.1 cm) while variceal bleeding was the major cause of decompensation (73.2%) and death (p≪0.001).ConclusionBoth SS/LS and SL/LS ratios are significantly higher in patients with portal HCV compared to lobular ALD. Thus, combined LS and SS or SL measurements provide additional information about disease etiology and disease-specific complications.Lay summaryHerein, we show that patients with hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) have higher spleen stiffness and portal pressure than patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), within the same fibrosis stage and matched to liver stiffness. Thus, the spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio is significantly higher in patients with HCV compared to ALD. Additionally, patients with HCV more commonly progress to portal hypertension-related complications (e.g. variceal bleeding), while patients with ALD more commonly progress to liver failure (e.g. jaundice). The spleen stiffness to liver stiffness ratio is a useful tool to confirm disease etiology and predict disease-specific complications.
| S-EPMC7001583 | biostudies-literature
Project description:OBJECTIVES:Spleen stiffness (SS) correlates with liver stiffness (LS) and hepatic venous pressure gradient. The latter is currently the most accurate predictor of hepatic decompensation. Our study aims to check whether SS has a similar predictive capability, while being an easy-to-perform noninvasive test in a real-life patient cohort. METHODS:Concomitantly, 210 successive patients were examined and received liver and SS measurements and a standard laboratory. Patients were observed for 1 year in terms of clinical signs of decompensation. RESULTS:One hundred fifty-nine of the initial 210 patients had a valid LS and SS measurement and were evaluable for clinical follow-up. Twelve patients developed a hepatic decompensation; with a SS >39 kPa (P=0.0005). Especially in a group with elevated LS, patients with a high risk of decompensation could be identified using SS. Patients with comparable LS who suffered from acute liver damage had significantly lower SS than respective patients with chronic liver damage (30.97 vs. 46.03 kPa; P=0.04). Acute liver failure was associated with elevated LS (16.47 kPa) but not with elevated SS (30.97 kPa). CONCLUSIONS:The risk of a hepatic decompensation can easily be assessed using SS measurement. Therefore SS measurement might be a powerful screening tool identifying patients who need closer monitoring. Moreover, SS is able to differentiate between acute and chronic or acute on chronic liver damage.
| S-EPMC6613721 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:We aimed to investigate the early changes in liver and spleen stiffness measurement (LSM, SSM) in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) treated with new antivirals (DAA) to elucidate factors determining the initial change in stiffness and its implications for the long-term follow up of HCV-cured patients. METHODS:A total of 41 patients with cACLD who started DAA therapy underwent LSM and SSM at baseline, week 4, end of treatment (EOT), 24 and 48 weeks of follow up using transient elastography. RESULTS:LSM improved rapidly during the first 4 weeks of treatment (baseline: 20.8kPa; week 4: 17.5kPa, p = 0.002), with no significant changes between week 4 and EOT (18.3kPa, p = 0.444) and between EOT and 48-week follow up (14.3kPa, p = 0.148). Likewise, SSM improved rapidly (baseline: 45.7kPa; week 4: 33.8kPa, p = 0.047), with no significant changes between week 4 and EOT (30.8kPa, p = 0.153) and between EOT and 48-week follow up (31.2kPa, p = 0.317). A higher decrease in LSM was observed in patients with baseline ALT ? twofold upper limit normal (2 × ULN) than in those with ALT < 2 × ULN (-5.7kPa versus -1.6kPa). Patients who presented a decrease in LSM ? 10% during treatment compared with those with LSM < 10% decrease, showed lower SSM values, higher platelet counts and lower bilirubin levels at 24-week follow up. Those with decrease in SSM ? 10%, presented a higher increase in platelets than those with SSM < 10% change (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS:LSM and SSM decrease very rapidly during DAA treatment in cACLD patients suggesting that it most probably reflects a reduction in inflammation rather than in fibrosis. cACLD patients should be maintained under surveillance independently of stiffness changes, because advanced fibrosis can still be present.
| S-EPMC5557188 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe value of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in portal hypertension (PH) has yet to be determined in the context of chronic liver disease (CLD). This study examined the value of MRE for the prediction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and high-risk esophageal varices (EVs) in a CLD cohort with a generally high HVPG.MethodsPatients with CLD who underwent both HVPG measurement and two-dimensional MRE examination at Beijing Friendship Hospital between April 2018 and March 2022 were prospectively included. Two-dimensional MRE was performed within the liver and spleen. Endoscopy results and laboratory parameters were collected. Some selected published serum markers were calculated, including fibrosis 4, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, and King's score. The efficacy of the parameters for assessing PH was analyzed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, linear and logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses.ResultsA total of 48 patients were included. The mean HVPG was 16.8±5.8 mmHg. Among these patients, 47 patients had PH (HVPG >5 mmHg), and 43 patients had clinically significant PH (HVPG ≥10 mmHg). Among the parameters associated with HVPG, the strongest correlation was found for spleen stiffness (SS) (R=0.638; P<0.001). In multiple regression analyses, SS was independently associated with an elevated HVPG and high-risk EVs. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SS for identifying patients with an HVPG ≥16 mmHg, HVPG ≥20 mmHg, and high-risk EVs were 0.790, 0.822, and 0.886, respectively, which were higher than those of liver stiffness (LS) and serum markers but slightly inferior to that of fibrosis 4 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve =0.844) in identifying an HVPG ≥16 mmHg. SS cutoff values of 9.5, 10.05, and 9.9 kPa were selected to rule out the presence of an HVPG ≥16 mmHg, HVPG ≥20 mmHg, and high-risk EVs (sensitivity: 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively; specificity: 45.5%, 50%, and 60%, respectively).ConclusionsIn patients with generally high HVPG, SS measured by two-dimensional MRE may be a better predictor of HVPG values and high-risk EVs than LS and serum markers.
| S-EPMC10895134 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate the performance of spleen stiffness (SS) by using two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) for assessing the severity of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).Methods102 eligible patients were categorized as in the post-TIPS short-term (n = 69) and long-term (n = 38) follow-up groups. The performance of SS by using 2D-SWE for evaluating the severity of GEVs was compared with liver stiffness (LS), spleen stiffness-to-liver stiffness ratio (SS/LS), liver stiffness spleen-diameter-to-platelet-ratio score (LSPS), portal hypertension (PH) risk score, platelet count-to-spleen diameter ratio (PSR), and varices risk score by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and DeLong test.ResultsIn the post-TIPS short-term follow-up group, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of SS were 0.585 for mild (cutoff value = 30.3 kPa), 0.655 for moderate (cutoff value = 30.6 kPa), and 0.739 for severe (cutoff value = 31.9 kPa) GEVs, which were higher than other parameters for severe GEVs. AUCs of SS were lower than other parameters for mild and moderate GEVs, but no difference was found (p > 0.05). In the post-TIPS long-term follow-up group, AUCs of SS were 0.778 for mild (cutoff value = 28.9 kPa), 0.82 for moderate (cutoff value = 29.9 kPa), and 0.824 for severe (cutoff value = 37.7 kPa) GEVs, which were higher than other parameters except for severe GEVs. AUC of SS was lower than other parameters for severe GEVs, but no significant difference was found (p > 0.05).ConclusionSS is an effective noninvasive tool to predict GEV severity during the post-TIPS follow-up.
| S-EPMC8077793 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background & aimWe studied FibroTouch (FT) and Fibroscan (FS) examination results and their repeatability when performed by healthcare personnel of different background.MethodsFT and FS examinations were performed on patients with chronic liver disease by two operators, a doctor and a nurse, twice on each patient, at two different time points, independent of each other.ResultsThe data for 163 patients with 1304 examinations was analyzed. There was strong correlation between FT and FS for attenuation parameter (Spearman's rho 0.76, p<0.001) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (Spearman's rho 0.70, p<0.001). However, FT produced higher value at lower attenuation parameter and LSM, and lower value at higher attenuation parameter and LSM. There was substantial agreement when using 15kPa LSM cut-off, but only moderate agreement when using 10kPa and 20kPa LSM cut-offs and 248dB/m, 268dB/m and 280dB/m attenuation parameter cut-offs. The IQR for attenuation parameter and IQR/median for LSM were significantly lower for FT compared with FS (4dB/m vs 27dB/m, p<0.001, and 10 vs 12, p<0.001, respectively). The intra- and inter-observer reliability of attenuation parameter and LSM using FT and FS were good to excellent with intraclass correlation coefficients 0.89-0.99. FT had shorter examination time (33s vs 47s, p<0.001) and less invalid measurements (0 vs 2, p<0.001).ConclusionMeasurements obtained with FT and FS strongly correlated, but significant differences in their absolute values, consistency, examination time and number of invalid measurements were observed. Either device can be used by healthcare personnel of different backgrounds when sufficiently trained.
| S-EPMC8092664 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The management of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) depends on their clinical stage. Thus, noninvasive early recognition of patients with CHC at high risk for developing liver-related events (LREs) is important because it ensures optimal preventative management strategies may be employed that can affect the course of CHC disease. Our aim was to determine whether liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients is associated with a risk of LREs, particularly in cirrhotic patients. We carried out a retrospective study on 343 HCV-infected patients stratified according to cirrhosis (LSM<12.5 kPa vs. LSM≥12.5 kPa), and the cirrhotic patient group (LSM≥12.5 kPa) was divided according to risk of esophageal varices (LSM <25 kPa vs. LSM≥25 kPa). For all patients, each incremental unit in the natural logarithm (Ln) of LSM was associated with 14.76 times higher risk of developing LREs (p<0.001). Patients with cirrhosis (LSM≥12.5 kPa) had a higher risk of LREs than patients without cirrhosis (LSM<12.5 kPa) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 30.97; p<0.001]. When only cirrhotic patients were analyzed (n = 60), each incremental unit in the Ln of LSM was associated with 10.56 times higher risk of developing LREs (p = 0.010). Patients with LSM≥25 kPa had a greater risk for LRE development compared to those with LSM<25 kPa (aHR = 3.65; p = 0.045). The AUROC for predicting the onset of LREs was 0.876 in all patients and 0.729 in cirrhotic patients. In conclusion, LSM was associated with an increased risk of developing LREs in HCV-infected patients, even within the group of cirrhotic patients.
| S-EPMC5589221 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe accurate assessment of liver fibrosis is essential for patients with chronic liver disease. A liver biopsy is an invasive procedure that has many potential defects and complications. Therefore, noninvasive assessment techniques are of considerable value for clinical diagnosis. Liver and spleen magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and serum markers have been proposed for quantitative and noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. This study aims to compare the diagnostic performance of liver and spleen stiffness measured by MRE, fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and their combined models for staging hepatic fibrosis.MethodsOne hundred and twenty patients with chronic liver disease underwent MRE scans. Liver and spleen stiffness were measured by the MRE stiffness maps. Serum markers were collected to calculate FIB-4 and APRI. Liver biopsies were used to identify pathologic grading. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis evaluated the correlation between the parameters and fibrosis stages. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated the performance of the four individual parameters, a liver and spleen stiffness combined model, and an all-parameters combined model in assessing liver fibrosis.ResultsLiver stiffness, spleen stiffness, FIB-4, and APRI were all correlated with fibrosis stage (r=0.87, 0.64, 0.65, and 0.51, respectively, all P<0.001). Among the 4 individual diagnostic markers, liver stiffness showed the highest values in staging F1–4, F2–4, F3–4 and F4 (AUC =0.89, 0. 97, 0.95, and 0.95, all P<0.001). The AUCs of the liver and spleen stiffness combined model in the F1–4, F2–4, F3–4, and F4 staging groups were 0.89, 0.97, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively (all P<0.001). The corresponding AUCs of the all-parameters combined model were 0.90, 0.97, 0.95, and 0.96 (all P<0.001). The AUCs of the liver and spleen stiffness combined model were significantly higher than those of APRI, FIB-4 in the F2–4, F3–4, and F4 staging groups (all P<0.05). Both combined models were not significantly different from liver stiffness in staging liver fibrosis (all P>0.05).ConclusionsLiver stiffness measured with MRE had better diagnostic performance than spleen stiffness, APRI, and FIB-4 for fibrosis staging. The combined models did not significantly improve the diagnostic value compared with liver stiffness in staging fibrosis.
| S-EPMC7276364 | biostudies-literature