Dataset Information

The Effect of Venlafaxine on Electrocardiogram Intervals During Treatment for Depression in Older Adults.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose/background

Venlafaxine is a commonly used antidepressant with both serotonergic and noradrenergic activity. There are concerns that it may prolong the corrected QT interval (QTc), and older adults may be at higher risk for this adverse effect, especially at higher dosages of the medication.

Methods/procedures

In this secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial, we measured changes in QTc and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters in 169 adults 60 years or older with a major depressive disorder treated acutely with venlafaxine extended release up to 300 mg daily. We examined the relationship of venlafaxine dosage and ECG parameters, as well as the relationship between serum levels of venlafaxine and ECG parameters.

Findings/results

Venlafaxine exposure was not associated with an increase in QTc. Heart rate increased with venlafaxine treatment, whereas the PR interval shortened, and QRS width did not change significantly. The QTc change from baseline was not associated with venlafaxine dosages or serum concentrations. Age, sex, cardiovascular comorbidities, and depression remission status did not predict changes in QTc with venlafaxine.

Implications/conclusions

Venlafaxine treatment did not prolong QTc or other ECG parameters, even in high dosages in older depressed adults. These findings indicate that venlafaxine does not significantly affect cardiac conduction in most older patients.

SUBMITTER: Behlke LM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7606781 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe QT interval and the QT dispersion are currently a subject of considerable interest. Cardiac repolarization delay is known to favor the development of arrhythmias. The QT dispersion, defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals or as the standard deviation of the QT duration in the 12-lead ECG is assumed to be reliable predictor of cardiovascular mortality. The seventh annual PhysioNet/Computers in Cardiology Challenge, 2006 addresses a question of high clinical interest: Can the QT interval be measured by fully automated methods with accuracy acceptable for clinical evaluations?MethodThe PTB Diagnostic ECG Database was given to 4 cardiologists and 1 biomedical engineer for manual marking of QRS onsets and T-wave ends in 458 recordings. Each recording consisted of one selected beat in lead II, chosen visually to have minimum baseline shift, noise, and artifact.In cases where no T wave could be observed or its amplitude was very small, the referees were instructed to mark a 'group-T-wave end' taking into consideration leads with better manifested T wave.A modified Delphi approach was used, which included up to three rounds of measurements to obtain results closer to the median.ResultsA total amount of 2*5*548 Q-onsets and T-wave ends were manually marked during round 1. To obtain closer to the median results, 8.58 % of Q-onsets and 3.21 % of the T-wave ends had to be reviewed during round 2, and 1.50 % Q-onsets and 1.17 % T-wave ends in round 3. The mean and standard deviation of the differences between the values of the referees and the median after round 3 were 2.43 +/- 0.96 ms for the Q-onset, and 7.43 +/- 3.44 ms for the T-wave end.ConclusionA fully accessible, on the Internet, dataset of manually measured Q-onsets and T-wave ends was created and presented in additional file: 1 (Table 4) with this article. Thus, an available standard can be used for the development of automated methods for the detection of Q-onsets, T-wave ends and for QT interval measurements.

Project description:IntroductionDepression is a common mental disorder and is a major cause of years lived with disability. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused an increase in the prevalence of depression worldwide. Our aim is to identify and synthesise the determinants of depression, the diagnostic assessment tools used to evaluate depression, and the interventions carried out since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in the population aged 60 and older.Methods and analysisA systematic review of the literature will be conducted. The following databases will be searched: CINAHL Plus with Full Text, MedicLatina, MEDLINE with Full Text, and Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection. The search strategy will include the following Medical Subject Headings or similar terms: "Depression", "Depressive Disorder", "Depressive Symptoms", "Older Adults", "Aging", "Elderly", Pandemic" and "COVID-19". Two independent reviewers will ascertain whether the resulting articles meet inclusion and exclusion criteria, and perform the analysis of data quality. Disagreements will be resolved by a third reviewer. All studies reported between December 2019 and March 2022 meeting the following criteria will be included: studies in adults aged 60 and over, and articles written in English, Portuguese, Spanish or German. Information on determinants of depression, assessment instruments used to assess depressive symptoms and/or interventions to decrease depression are reported. Studies will not be excluded based on geographical area study context (eg, community, culture or specific environment). All studies related to diagnostic assessment, care planning and/or intervention strategies specifically for older adults with depression will be included.Ethics and disseminationAs only secondary data will be analysed, no ethical approval is required for this study. This scientific article is a systematic review protocol for which data have not yet been extracted or analysed. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.Prospero registration numberCRD42022299775.