Dataset Information

Out-of-Pocket Payment for Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Among Commercially Insured in the United States.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Clinical guidelines increasingly recommended ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for hypertension diagnosis and management. Yet, ABPM is used infrequently in the United States, possibly because of low insurance coverage and high patient costs. We sought to analyze out-of-pocket payments (OPPs) for ABPM among privately insured patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis using IBM® MarketScan® commercial claims of beneficiaries aged ≥18 years receiving ABPM from January 2012 to December 2018. The date of first ABPM claim (Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes 93784, 93786, 93788, or 93790) was considered the index date. Patients with 12 months of continuous enrollment preindex and 30-day postindex were included. Per beneficiary OPP was calculated by aggregating all ABPM-related OPPs within the 30-day postindex window (ABPM episode).

Results

Of 22,317 beneficiaries receiving ABPM, 62% had $0 OPP and 38% had OPP >$0. Among the latter, median OPP per beneficiary for an ABPM episode was $23 (interquartile range [IQR], $14, $32), driven primarily by full ABPM claims (median, $22; IQR, $14, $24). Among individual components, scan analysis and report claims (median, $25; IQR, $13, $49) had the greatest OPP. The median OPP per ABPM episode did not change substantively from 2012 through 2018.

Conclusions

Among commercially insured in the United States, nearly 4-in-10 have an OPP for ABPM. Though most OPPs are relatively modest, some patients incur substantial OPP. Our findings highlight the need for policymakers to ensure adequate ABPM coverage in the commercial insurance marketplace.

SUBMITTER: Desai R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7608520 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the type, frequency, and timing of health care use among commercially insured postpartum and nonpostpartum women.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from a large national commercial claims database. Women between 18 and 44 years of age who gave birth in 2016 (n=149,563) and women who were neither pregnant nor postpartum between 2015 and 2017 (n=2,048,831) (nonpostpartum) were included. We examined hospitalization, and preventive visits, problem visits, and emergency department (ED) visits among postpartum women during the early postpartum period (less than 21 days after childbirth), the postpartum period (21-60 days postpartum), and extended postpartum period (61-365 days after childbirth). Visits among nonpostpartum women were assessed during time periods of equivalent duration.ResultsAlmost 24% of postpartum women had a problem visit in the early postpartum period, compared with 19.7% of nonpostpartum women (adjusted difference 4.8 percentage points [95% CI 4.6-5.0]). Approximately 3% of postpartum women had an early ED visit, more than double the percentage among nonpostpartum women (adjusted difference 2.3 percentage points [95% CI 2.2-2.4]). Both problem visits and ED visits among postpartum women remained elevated relative to nonpostpartum women during the postpartum and extended postpartum periods. Although postpartum women were more likely than nonpostpartum women to receive preventive care during the early and postpartum periods, only 43% of postpartum women had a preventive visit during the extended postpartum period, a rate 1.8 (95% CI -2.1 to -1.5) percentage points lower than that of nonpostpartum women. Adjusted hospitalization rates among postpartum women in the early (0.8%), postpartum (0.3%), and extended postpartum (1.4%) periods were higher than those of nonpostpartum women (0.1%, 0.2%, and 1.6%, respectively).ConclusionsCommercially insured postpartum women use more health care than nonpostpartum women, including inpatient care. Differences are largest in the early postpartum period and persist beyond 60 days postpartum.