Rapid genotype imputation from sequence with reference panels.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Davies RW
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7611184 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Inexpensive genotyping methods are essential for genetic studies requiring large sample sizes. In human studies, array-based microarrays and high-density haplotype reference panels allow efficient genotype imputation for this purpose. However, these resources are typically unavailable in non-human settings. Here we describe a method (STITCH) for imputation based only on sequencing read data, without requiring additional reference panels or array data. We demonstrate its applicability even in settings of extremely low sequencing coverage, by accurately imputing 5.7 million SNPs at a mean r(2) value of 0.98 in 2,073 outbred laboratory mice (0.15× sequencing coverage). In a sample of 11,670 Han Chinese (1.7× coverage), we achieve accuracy similar to that of alternative approaches that require a reference panel, demonstrating that our approach can work for genetically diverse populations. Our method enables straightforward progression from low-coverage sequence to imputed genotypes, overcoming barriers that at present restrict the application of genome-wide association study technology outside humans.
| S-EPMC4966640 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified common variants that are associated with complex diseases. However, the majority of genetic variants contributing to disease susceptibility are yet to be discovered. It is now widely believed that multiple rare variants are likely to be associated with complex diseases. Using custom-made chips or next-generation sequencing to uncover the effects of rare variants on the disease can be very expensive in current technology. Consequently, many researchers use the genotype imputation approach to predict the genotypes at these rare variants that are not directly genotyped in the study sample. One important question in genotype imputation is how to choose a reference panel that will produce high imputation accuracy in a population of interest. Using whole genome sequence data from the Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 data set, this report compares genotype imputation accuracy among reference panels representing different degrees of genetic similarity to a study sample of admixed Mexican Americans. Results show that a reference panel that closely matches the ancestry of the study population can increase imputation accuracy, but it can also result in more missing genotype calls. Having a larger-size reference panel can reduce imputation error and missing genotype, but the improvement may be limited. We also find that, for the admixed study sample, the simple selection of a single best-reference panel among HapMap African, European, or Asian population is not appropriate. The composite reference panel combining all available reference data should be used.
| S-EPMC4143631 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genotype imputation estimates unobserved genotypes from genome-wide makers, to increase genome coverage and power for genome-wide association studies. Imputation has been successful for European ancestry populations in which very large reference panels are available. Smaller subsets of African descent populations are available in 1000 Genomes (1000G), the Consortium on Asthma among African ancestry Populations in the Americas (CAAPA) and the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC). We compared the performance of these reference panels when imputing variation in 3747 African Americans (AA) from two cohorts (HCV and COPDGene) genotyped using Illumina Omni microarrays. The haplotypes of 2504 (1000G), 883 (CAAPA) and 32,470 individuals (HRC) were used as reference. We compared the number of variants, imputation quality, imputation accuracy and coverage between panels. In both cohorts, 1000G imputed 1.5-1.6× more variants than CAAPA and 1.2× more than HRC. Similar findings were observed for variants with imputation R2 > 0.5 and for rare, low-frequency, and common variants. When merging imputed variants of the three panels, the total number was 62-63 M with 20 M overlapping variants imputed by all three panels, and a range of 5-15 M variants imputed exclusively with one of them. For overlapping variants, imputation quality was highest for HRC, followed by 1000G, then CAAPA, and improved as the minor allele frequency increased. 1000G, HRC and CAAPA provided high performance and accuracy for imputation of African American individuals, increasing the number of variants available for subsequent analyses. These panels are complementary and would benefit from the development of an integrated African reference panel.
| S-EPMC6209094 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genotype imputation is an integral tool in genome-wide association studies, in which it facilitates meta-analysis, increases power, and enables fine-mapping. With the increasing availability of whole-genome-sequence datasets, investigators have access to a multitude of reference-panel choices for genotype imputation. In principle, combining all sequenced whole genomes into a single large panel would provide the best imputation performance, but this is often cumbersome or impossible due to privacy restrictions. Here, we describe meta-imputation, a method that allows imputation results generated using different reference panels to be combined into a consensus imputed dataset. Our meta-imputation method requires small changes to the output of existing imputation tools to produce necessary inputs, which are then combined using dynamically estimated weights that are tailored to each individual and genome segment. In the scenarios we examined, the method consistently outperforms imputation using a single reference panel and achieves accuracy comparable to imputation using a combined reference panel.
| S-EPMC9247833 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We address the task of genotype imputation to a dense reference panel given genotype likelihoods computed from ultralow coverage sequencing as inputs. In this setting, the data have a high-level of missingness or uncertainty, and are thus more amenable to a probabilistic representation. Most existing imputation algorithms are not well suited for this situation, as they rely on prephasing for computational efficiency, and, without definite genotype calls, the prephasing task becomes computationally expensive. We describe GeneImp, a program for genotype imputation that does not require prephasing and is computationally tractable for whole-genome imputation. GeneImp does not explicitly model recombination, instead it capitalizes on the existence of large reference panels-comprising thousands of reference haplotypes-and assumes that the reference haplotypes can adequately represent the target haplotypes over short regions unaltered. We validate GeneImp based on data from ultralow coverage sequencing (0.5×), and compare its performance to the most recent version of BEAGLE that can perform this task. We show that GeneImp achieves imputation quality very close to that of BEAGLE, using one to two orders of magnitude less time, without an increase in memory complexity. Therefore, GeneImp is the first practical choice for whole-genome imputation to a dense reference panel when prephasing cannot be applied, for instance, in datasets produced via ultralow coverage sequencing. A related future application for GeneImp is whole-genome imputation based on the off-target reads from deep whole-exome sequencing.
| S-EPMC5419496 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Based on evaluations of imputation performed on a genotype dataset consisting of about 11,000 sub-Saharan African (SSA) participants, we show Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) and the African Genome Resource (AGR) to be currently the best panels for imputing SSA datasets. We report notable differences in the number of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are imputed by different panels in datasets from East, West, and South Africa. Comparisons with a subset of 95 SSA high-coverage whole-genome sequences (WGSs) show that despite being about 20-fold smaller, the AGR imputed dataset has higher concordance with the WGSs. Moreover, the level of concordance between imputed and WGS datasets was strongly influenced by the extent of Khoe-San ancestry in a genome, highlighting the need for integration of not only geographically but also ancestrally diverse WGS data in reference panels for further improvement in imputation of SSA datasets. Approaches that integrate imputed data from different panels could also lead to better imputation.
| S-EPMC10300601 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Large-scale imputation reference panels are currently available and have contributed to efficient genome-wide association studies through genotype imputation. However, whether large-size multi-ancestry or small-size population-specific reference panels are the optimal choices for under-represented populations continues to be debated. We imputed genotypes of East Asian (180k Japanese) subjects using the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine reference panel and found that the standard imputation quality metric (Rsq) overestimated dosage r2 (squared correlation between imputed dosage and true genotype) particularly in marginal-quality bins. Variance component analysis of Rsq revealed that the increased imputed-genotype certainty (dosages closer to 0, 1 or 2) caused upward bias, indicating some systemic bias in the imputation. Through systematic simulations using different template switching rates (θ value) in the hidden Markov model, we revealed that the lower θ value increased the imputed-genotype certainty and Rsq; however, dosage r2 was insensitive to the θ value, thereby causing a deviation. In simulated reference panels with different sizes and ancestral diversities, the θ value estimates from Minimac decreased with the size of a single ancestry and increased with the ancestral diversity. Thus, Rsq could be deviated from dosage r2 for a subpopulation in the multi-ancestry panel, and the deviation represents different imputed-dosage distributions. Finally, despite the impact of the θ value, distant ancestries in the reference panel contributed only a few additional variants passing a predefined Rsq threshold. We conclude that the θ value substantially impacts the imputed dosage and the imputation quality metric value.
| S-EPMC10788679 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Imputation servers offer the exclusive possibility to harness the largest public reference panels which have been shown to deliver very high precision in the imputation of European genomes. Many studies have nonetheless stressed the importance of 'study specific panels' (SSPs) as an alternative and have shown the benefits of combining public reference panels with SSPs. But such combined approaches are not attainable when using external imputation servers. To investigate how to confront this challenge, we imputed 550 French individuals using either the University of Michigan imputation server with the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) panel or an in-house SSP of 850 whole-genome sequenced French individuals. With approximate geo-localization of both our target and SSP individuals we are able to pinpoint different scenarios where SSP-based imputation would be preferred over server-based imputation or vice-versa. This is achieved by showing to a high degree of resolution the importance of the proximity of the reference panel to target individuals; with a focus on the clear added value of SSPs for estimating haplotype phase and for the imputation of rare variants (minor allele-frequency below 0.01). Such benefits were most evident for individuals from the same geographical regions in France as the SSP individuals. Overall, only 42.3% of all 125,442 variants evaluated were better imputed with an SSP from France compared to an external reference panel, however this rises to 58.1% for individuals from geographic regions well covered by the SSP. By investigating haplotype sharing and population fine-structure in France, we show the importance of including SSP haplotypes for imputation but also that they should ideally be combined with large public panels. In the absence of the unattainable results from a combined panel of the HRC and our French SSP, we put forward a pragmatic solution where server-based and SSP-based imputation outcomes can be combined based on comparing posterior genotype probabilities. We show that such an approach can give a level of imputation accuracy in excess of what could be achieved with either strategy alone. The results presented provide detailed insights into the accuracy of imputation that should be expected from different strategies for European populations.
| S-EPMC10764714 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genotype imputation has been widely adopted in the postgenome-wide association studies (GWAS) era. Owing to its ability to accurately predict the genotypes of untyped variants, imputation greatly boosts variant density, allowing fine-mapping studies of GWAS loci and large-scale meta-analysis across different genotyping arrays. By leveraging genotype data from 90 whole-genome deeply sequenced individuals as the evaluation benchmark and the 1000 Genomes Project data as reference panels, we systematically examined four important issues related to genotype imputation practice. First, in a study of imputation accuracy, we found that IMPUTE2 and minimac have the best imputation performance among the three popular imputing software evaluated and that using a multi-population reference panel is beneficial. Second, the optimal imputation quality cutoff for removing poorly imputed variants varies according to the software used. Third, the major contributing factors to consistently poor imputation are low variant heterozygosity, high sequence similarity to other genomic regions, high GC content, segmental duplication and being far from genotyping markers. Lastly, in an evaluation of the imputability of all known GWAS regions, we found that GWAS loci associated with hematological measurements and immune system diseases are harder to impute, as compared with other human traits. Recommendations made based on the above findings may provide practical guidance for imputation exercise in future genetic studies.
| S-EPMC4580532 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We present a genotype imputation method that scales to millions of reference samples. The imputation method, based on the Li and Stephens model and implemented in Beagle v.4.1, is parallelized and memory efficient, making it well suited to multi-core computer processors. It achieves fast, accurate, and memory-efficient genotype imputation by restricting the probability model to markers that are genotyped in the target samples and by performing linear interpolation to impute ungenotyped variants. We compare Beagle v.4.1 with Impute2 and Minimac3 by using 1000 Genomes Project data, UK10K Project data, and simulated data. All three methods have similar accuracy but different memory requirements and different computation times. When imputing 10 Mb of sequence data from 50,000 reference samples, Beagle's throughput was more than 100× greater than Impute2's throughput on our computer servers. When imputing 10 Mb of sequence data from 200,000 reference samples in VCF format, Minimac3 consumed 26× more memory per computational thread and 15× more CPU time than Beagle. We demonstrate that Beagle v.4.1 scales to much larger reference panels by performing imputation from a simulated reference panel having 5 million samples and a mean marker density of one marker per four base pairs.
| S-EPMC4716681 | biostudies-literature