Dataset Information

Improved susceptibility weighted imaging at ultra-high field using bipolar multi-echo acquisition and optimized image processing: CLEAR-SWI.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) has become established in the clinical investigation of stroke, microbleeds, tumor vascularization, calcification and iron deposition, but suffers from a number of shortcomings and artefacts. The goal of this study was to reduce the sensitivity of SWI to strong B₁ and B₀ inhomogeneities at ultra-high field to generate homogeneous images with increased contrast and free of common artefacts. All steps in SWI processing have been addressed - coil combination, phase unwrapping, image combination over echoes, phase filtering and homogeneity correction - and applied to an efficient bipolar multi-echo acquisition to substantially improve the quality of SWI.

Principal results

Our findings regarding the optimal individual processing steps lead us to propose a Contrast-weighted, Laplace-unwrapped, bipolar multi-Echo, ASPIRE-combined, homogeneous, improved Resolution SWI, or CLEAR-SWI. CLEAR-SWI was compared to two other multi-echo SWI methods and standard, single-echo SWI with the same acquisition time at 7 T in 10 healthy volunteers and with single-echo SWI in 13 patients with brain tumors. CLEAR-SWI had improved contrast-to-noise and homogeneity, reduced signal dropout and was not compromised by the artefacts which affected standard SWI in 10 out of 13 cases close to tumors (as assessed by expert raters), as well as generating T2* maps and phase images which can be used for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping. In a comparison with other multi-echo SWI methods, CLEAR-SWI had the fewest artefacts, highest SNR and generally higher contrast-to-noise.

Major conclusions

CLEAR-SWI eliminates the artefacts common in standard, single-echo SWI, reduces signal dropouts and improves image homogeneity and contrast-to-noise. Applied clinically, in a study of brain tumor patients, CLEAR-SWI was free of the artefacts which affected standard, single-echo SWI.

SUBMITTER: Eckstein K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7612087 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Purpose To assess image quality and speed improvements for single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) with variable refocusing flip angles and full-Fourier acquisition (vrfSSFSE) pelvic imaging via a prospective trial performed in the context of uterine leiomyoma evaluation. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. vrfSSFSE and conventional SSFSE sagittal and coronal oblique acquisitions were performed in 54 consecutive female patients referred for 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of known or suspected uterine leiomyomas. Two radiologists who were blinded to the image acquisition technique semiquantitatively scored images on a scale from -2 to 2 for noise, image contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and perceived ability to evaluate uterine, ovarian, and musculoskeletal structures. The null hypothesis of no significant difference between pulse sequences was assessed with a Wilcoxon signed rank test by using a Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results Because of reductions in specific absorption rate, vrfSSFSE imaging demonstrated significantly increased speed (more than twofold, P < .0001), with mean repetition times compared with conventional SSFSE imaging decreasing from 1358 to 613 msec for sagittal acquisitions and from 1494 to 621 msec for coronal oblique acquisitions. Almost all assessed image quality and perceived diagnostic capability parameters were significantly improved with vrfSSFSE imaging. These improvements included noise, sharpness, and ability to evaluate the junctional zone, myometrium, and musculoskeletal structures for both sagittal acquisitions (mean values of 0.56, 0.63, 0.42, 0.56, and 0.80, respectively; all P values < .0001) and coronal oblique acquisitions (mean values of 0.81, 1.09, 0.65, 0.93, and 1.12, respectively; all P values < .0001). For evaluation of artifacts, there was an insufficient number of cases with differences to allow statistical testing. Conclusion Compared with conventional SSFSE acquisition, vrfSSFSE acquisition increases 3-T imaging speed via reduced specific absorption rate and leads to significant improvements in perceived image quality and perceived diagnostic capability when evaluating pelvic structures. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.