Dataset Information

Relapses During High-Dose Biotin Treatment in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: a Case-Crossover and Propensity Score-Adjusted Prospective Cohort.

ABSTRACT: High-dose biotin (HDB) is a therapy used in non-active progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). Some reports have suggested that HDB treatment may be associated with an increased risk of relapse. We evaluate the relationship between exposure to HDB for treating PMS and the risk of relapse. We screened for PMS patients prospectively registered in a French regional cohort being part of the OFSEP national registry. In a case-crossover design among patients who received HDB, we first compared number of relapses before and after initiation of HDB. Second, time to the first clinical relapse was compared between patients who received HDB (biotin group) and a control group using a Cox survival analysis after a propensity score (PS) matching (1:1) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. In the 42 PMS patients who received HDB, the number of relapses was statistically and clinically significant higher after biotin initiation than before biotin initiation (incident rate ratio [IRR] 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-15.9, p < 0.0001). With the PS matching method, the risk of relapse was significantly higher in the biotin group compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, 95% CI 1.4-13.3, p = 0.01). The IPTW method with 440 control patients revealed consistent results (HR 5.1, 95% CI 2.3-11.3, p < 0.0001). In our non-randomized study, HDB treatment for PMS was associated with an increased risk of relapse. The follow-up of PMS patients initiating HDB should include careful assessment of clinical and radiological activity to monitor the potential pro-inflammatory effect of biotin.

SUBMITTER: Branger P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7641290 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveIntravenous methylprednisolone is the standard treatment for a multiple sclerosis relapse; however, this fails to improve symptoms in up to one quarter of patients. Immunoadsorption is an accepted treatment for refractory relapses, but prospective comparator-controlled studies are missing.MethodsIn this observational study, patients with steroid-refractory acute multiple sclerosis relapses receiving either six courses of tryptophan-immunoadsorption or double-dose methylprednisolone therapy were analysed. Outcomes were evaluated at discharge and three months later. Immune profiling of blood lymphocytes and proteomic analysis were performed by multi-parameter flow cytometry and Olink analysis, respectively (NCT04450030).Results42 patients were enrolled (methylprednisolone: 26 patients; immunoadsorption: 16 patients). For determination of the primary outcome, treatment response was stratified according to relative function system score changes ("full/best" vs. "average" vs. "worse/none"). Upon discharge, the adjusted odds ratio for any treatment response ("full/best" + "average" vs. "worse/none") was 10.697 favouring immunoadsorption (p = 0.005 compared to methylprednisolone). At follow-up, the adjusted odds ratio for the best treatment response ("full/best" vs. "average" + "worse/none") was 103.236 favouring IA patients (p = 0.001 compared to methylprednisolone). Similar results were observed regarding evoked potentials and quality of life outcomes, as well as serum neurofilament light-chain levels. Flow cytometry revealed a profound reduction of B cell subsets following immunoadsorption, which was closely correlated to clinical outcomes, whereas methylprednisolone had a minimal effect on B cell populations. Immunoadsorption treatment skewed the blood cytokine network, reduced levels of B cell-related cytokines and reduced immunoglobulin levels as well as levels of certain coagulation factors.InterpretationImmunoadsorption demonstrated favourable outcomes compared to double-dose methylprednisolone. Outcome differences were significant at discharge and follow-up. Further analyses identified modulation of B cell function as a potential mechanism of action for immunoadsorption, as reduction of B cell subsets correlated with clinical improvement.

Project description:AimsThe mortality in cardiogenic shock (CS) is high. The role of specific mechanical circulatory support (MCS) systems is unclear. We aimed to compare patients receiving Impella versus ECLS (extracorporal life support) with regard to baseline characteristics, feasibility, and outcomes in CS.Methods and resultsThis is a retrospective cohort study including CS patients over 18 years with a complete follow-up of the primary endpoint and available baseline lactate level, receiving haemodynamic support either by Impella 2.5 or ECLS from two European registries. The decision for device implementation was made at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause mortality at 30 days. A propensity score for the use of Impella was calculated, and multivariable logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR). In total, 149 patients were included, receiving either Impella (n = 73) or ECLS (n = 76) for CS. The feasibility of device implantation was high (87%) and similar (aOR: 3.14; 95% CI: 0.18-56.50; P = 0.41) with both systems. The rates of vascular injuries (aOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.10-3.50; P = 0.56) and bleedings requiring transfusions (aOR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.09-2.10; P = 0.29) were similar in ECLS patients and Impella patients. The use of Impella or ECLS was not associated with increased odds of mortality (aOR: 4.19; 95% CI: 0.53-33.25; P = 0.17), after correction for propensity score and baseline lactate level. Baseline lactate level was independently associated with increased odds of 30 day mortality (per mmol/L increase; OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.14-1.45; P < 0.001).ConclusionsIn CS patients, the adjusted mortality rates of both ECLS and Impella were high and similar. The baseline lactate level was a potent predictor of mortality and could play a role in patient selection for therapy in future studies. In patients with profound CS, the type of device is likely to be less important compared with other parameters including non-cardiac and neurological factors.

Project description:Background:Oligodendrocytes (OGs) provide metabolic support to motor neurons (MNs) and are implicated in the pathophysiology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). MD1003, or high-dose Pharmaceutical grade Biotin (hdPB), may improve disability in progressive multiple sclerosis patients via augmentation of OG or MN energy levels. Here, we assessed the safety and efficacy of MD1003 in ALS patients. Methods:This single centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included patients aged 25-80 years with probable or definite ALS. Patients were assigned (2:1), using a computer-generated randomisation list, to receive oral MD1003 (300 mg/day) or placebo treatment for 24 weeks. The primary outcome, safety, was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03114215, has been completed. Findings:Between June and December 2016, 30 patients were enrolled (MD1003, n = 20; placebo, n = 10). Baseline characteristics were representative of the ALS population. MD1003 and placebo groups were not well balanced at screening, with the MD1003-treated group having a higher rate of ALSFRS-R decline prior to screening versus placebo (-6·0 IQR [-8·5, -5·0] vs. -5·0 IQR [-5·0, -3·0]) and a predominance of ALS with upper limb onset compared to placebo (35% vs. 10%). MD1003 had a favourable safety profile and was well tolerated. The occurrence of adverse events was similar in both groups (60%). Two deaths occurred in the MD1003 group versus 1 in the placebo group. ALSFRS-R median change from baseline to month 6 was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0·49); the mean difference between groups was -1·6 (SEM=3·3). Interpretation:MD1003 treatment was safe and well tolerated. It was not possible to establish MD1003 efficacy in this relatively small study. Given the favourable safety profile of MD1003 and an imbalance between treatment groups favouring placebo, additional, larger studies in ALS are warranted. Funding:MedDay Pharmaceuticals.

Dataset Information

Relapses During High-Dose Biotin Treatment in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: a Case-Crossover and Propensity Score-Adjusted Prospective Cohort.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets