Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Differences of SARS-CoV-2 serological test performance between hospitalized and outpatient COVID-19 cases.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Serological severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody assays differ in the target antigen specificity, e.g. of antibodies directed against the viral spike or the nucleocapsid protein, and in the spectrum of detected immunoglobulins. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of two different routinely used immunoassays in hospitalized and outpatient COVID-19 cases.

Methods

The test characteristics of commercially available spike1 protein-based serological assays (Euroimmun, EI-assays), determining IgA or IgG and nucleocapsid-based assays (Virotech, VT-assays) determining IgA, IgM or IgG were compared in 139 controls and 116 hospitalized and outpatient COVID-19 cases.

Results

Hospitalized COVID-19 patients (n = 51; 115 samples) showed significantly higher concentrations of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and differed from outpatient cases (n = 65) by higher age, higher disease severity scores and earlier follow up blood sampling. Sensitivity of the two IgG assays was comparable in hospitalized patients tested ? 14 days (EI-assay: 88%, CI95% 67.6-99.9; VT-assay: 96%, CI95% 77.7-99.8). In outpatient COVID-19 cases sensitivity was significantly lower in the VT-assay (86.2%, CI95% 74.8-93.1) compared with the EI-assay (98.5%, CI95% 90.6-99.9). Assays for IgA and IgM demonstrated a lack of specificity or sensitivity.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 serological assays may need to be optimized to produce reliable results in outpatient COVID-19 cases who are low or even asymptomatic. Assays for IgA and IgM have limited diagnostic performance and do not prove an additional value for population-based screening approaches.

SUBMITTER: Wolf J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7642750 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Differences of SARS-CoV-2 serological test performance between hospitalized and outpatient COVID-19 cases.

Wolf Johannes J   Kaiser Thorsten T   Pehnke Sarah S   Nickel Olaf O   Lübbert Christoph C   Kalbitz Sven S   Arnold Benjamin B   Ermisch Jörg J   Berger Luisa L   Schroth Stefanie S   Isermann Berend B   Borte Stephan S   Biemann Ronald R  

Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 20201105


<h4>Background</h4>Serological severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody assays differ in the target antigen specificity, e.g. of antibodies directed against the viral spike or the nucleocapsid protein, and in the spectrum of detected immunoglobulins. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of two different routinely used immunoassays in hospitalized and outpatient COVID-19 cases.<h4>Methods</h4>The test characteristics of commercially available spike1 pr  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7273265 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8803198 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7817432 | biostudies-literature
| S-SCDT-EMM-2022-15904 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC7441068 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8092742 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8339017 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7367508 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7681189 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7580567 | biostudies-literature