Apatinib as an alternative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Zhang XH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7643208 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Apatinib as an alternative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhang Xi-Hao XH Cao Man-Qing MQ Li Xiu-Xiu XX Zhang Ti T
World journal of hepatology 20201001 10
Angiogenesis plays an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors. Registered tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting vascular endothelial growth factor reduce angiogenesis. Apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can specifically inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, showing encouraging anti-tumor effects in a variety of tumors including advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This article intends to review the clinical research and application prospects of apatinib ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:As treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are currently limited, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral apatinib, a VEGFR-2 inhibitor, on patients with advanced HCC. Twenty-two patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were enrolled for evaluation. Apatinib was administered at 500 mg/day or 250 mg/day continuously. Clinical endpoints were time to disease progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and safety. The median TTP of treated patients was 10.4 months (95% CI 3.4 -17.5). At the last follow-up, 50% patients had survived longer than 11.4 months from the first dose. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) rates were 0%, 40.9%, 40.9%, and 18.2%, respectively. The most common apatinib-related adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) (81.8%) and diarrhea (77.3%). Hypertension (27.3%) and HFSR (13.6%) were the most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events. In summary, results of this small study indicate that apatinib is well tolerated and extremely effective for the treatment of advanced HCC. It is therefore imperative to design and carry out well-controlled clinical trials to confirm its efficacy.
| S-EPMC5739662 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundApatinib, a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR 2), has exhibited modest antitumor efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of apatinib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC.MethodsAll patients with advanced HCC who underwent sorafenib or apatinib between January 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy-two patients received apatinib (26 patients, 500 mg, daily) or sorafenib (46 patients, 400 mg, twice daily) until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. Primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) per modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.ResultsThe median follow-up was 13.2 (5.7-20.7) months. The 1-year OS for apatinib of 62.0% was comparable to that of sorafenib [64.2%, hazard ratio (HR), 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.369-3.58]. The median PFS was 4.1 months in the apatinib group (95% CI, 3.2 to 7.4 months) and 3.6 months in the sorafenib group (95% CI, 2.7 to 5.9 months; HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.586 to 1.800; P=0.925). The apatinib group exhibited higher ORR (19.2% vs. 2.2%, P=0.012) but similar DCR (57.7% vs. 50%, P=0.530) compared with the sorafenib group. The most common any-grade adverse events in the apatinib and sorafenib groups were hand and foot syndrome (53.8% vs. 50%), hypertension (50% vs. 19.6%), diarrhea (34.6% vs. 28.3%), and elevated transaminase (57.7% vs. 63%).ConclusionsCompared with sorafenib, apatinib yielded comparable PFS and OS, and even better ORR, in patients with advanced HCC.
| S-EPMC7475472 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is challenging. Several randomized clinical trials are investigating the efficacy of systemic therapy, immunotherapy, and locoregional therapy as monotherapy or combined with other modalities in the treatment of HCC. Systemic therapy is the preferred treatment in advanced disease. To date, multiple first-line and second-line agents received Food and Drug Administration approval. For over a decade, sorafenib was the only first-line agent. In May 2020, combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab has been approved as a first-line systemic regimen. Lenvatinib is another first-line agent that has multikinase activity. Second-line agents include cabozantinib, regorafenib, ramucirumab, and nivolumab. Adoptive cell transfer therapy is a highly specific immunotherapy that has shown antitumor activity against HCC. Oncolytic viruses are genetically modified viruses that infect cancer cells and induce apoptosis. Locoregional therapies such as transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization have shown a potential benefit in selected patients with advanced HCC. In this review, we aim to summarize the treatment options available for advanced HCC.
| S-EPMC7732574 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10121316 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and Purpose: Apatinib is a novel antiangiogenic agent that can target vascular endothelial cell growth factor 2. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib mesylate in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the real world. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 178 patients with advanced HCC who had been treated with apatinib mesylate from January 2017 to March 2020. The primary outcome indexes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome indexes were overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and incidence of treatment-related adverse reactions. Results: Univariate analysis showed that patients with third-line treatment (p <0.001), alpha fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/ml (p <0.05), distant metastasis (p <0.05), portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (p <0.05), and apatinib monotherapy (p <0.001) had shorter survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed that third-line drugs, PVTT, and combination therapy were independent prognostic factors for PFS in all patients. Univariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores (p <0.05), line of apatinib (p <0.001), AFP (p <0.001), tumor progression (p <0.05), PVTT (p <0.05), and combination therapy (p <0.001) may impact the OS. Multivariate analysis proved that AFP, PVTT, and combination therapy were independent prognostic factors for OS. The most common adverse reactions were secondary hypertension (29.21%), symptoms of fatigue (16.85%), hand and foot syndrome (16.29%), vomiting (14.04%), liver dysfunction (6.18%), and proteinuria (6.74%). Most of the adverse reactions were Grade 1 or 2. Conclusion: Apatinib mesylate is an effective treatment for advanced HCC, and its adverse reactions are relatively mild. Line of apatinib, PVTT, AFP level, and combination therapy were independent prognostic factors for patients with advanced HCC who were treated with apatinib.
| S-EPMC9152289 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background:The prognosis for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains clinically unsatisfying. Apatinib has proven to be a very effective treatment for advanced HCC in our previous retrospective study. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and toxicity of apatinib in patients with advanced HCC. Methods:This single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced HCC. These patients received apatinib, 500 mg once daily, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or death. One treatment cycle consisted of 4 weeks of apatinib treatment. The response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) was used to assess tumor response every 1-2 cycles. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity. Results:Between December 2016 and June 2018, 23 patients were enrolled in the study, 22 of whom were available for response evaluation. The cutoff date was August 10, 2018. The overall ORR and DCR were 30.4% and 65.2%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 13.8 (95% CI: 5.3-22.3) and 8.7 (95% CI: 5.9-11.1) months, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were proteinuria (39.1%), hypertension (34.8%), and hand-foot-skin reaction (34.8%). Conclusions:Apatinib showed robust clinical activity in patients with advanced HCC. Moreover, apatinib was safe to use, well tolerated, and had acceptable toxicity. (NCT03046979).
| S-EPMC7576000 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Methods83 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) admitted to the interventional oncology department were randomly divided into two groups. Apatinib and camrelizumab were administered to 42 patients in group A, whereas sorafenib was administered to 41 patients in group B for three months. The clinical efficacy was evaluated in terms of objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Certain tumor markers like alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF-1), immune function T lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+) were determined before and after treatment. The serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), osteopontin (OPN), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and epidermal growth factor 7 (EGF7)] were observed. The survival time between the two groups was compared, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and median survival (MS). Finally, the toxicity and side effects data were also obtained.ResultsThe ORR and DCR of group A were 69.05% and 88.10%, respectively, which were significantly higher (P<0.05) than group B (ORR=53.66% and DCR=70.73%). After treatment, the AFP, CA199, CEA, and HIF-1 levels of both groups decreased significantly (P<0.05), and the respective biomarker levels of group A were lower than those of group B (P<0.05). Following treatment, CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ index in group A significantly increased (P<0.05) while CD8+ level was significantly decreased (P<0.05). Compared to group B, a significant increase was observed in group A's CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+/CD8+ index. There were no significant changes in CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD4+/CD8+ indexes before and after treatment in group B (P>0.05). The serum level of VEGF, OPN, EGF-7 and AST indexes of group A&B were decreased significantly (P<0.05). Compared with group B, the VEGF, OPN, EGF7 and AST indexes of group A were significantly reduced (P<0.05). PFS and MS in group A were significantly higher than in group B (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between groups A and B in terms of toxicity and adverse effects (P>0.05).ConclusionIn treating HCC, combining apatinib and camrelizumab can reduce tumor markers, enhance the immune system and curative effect, and prolong patient survival. The underline mechanism is related to the down-regulation of VEGF, OPN and HIF-1 indexes.
| S-EPMC10090460 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a highly malignant digestive system tumor, poses substantial challenges due to its intricate underlying causes and pronounced post-surgery recurrence. Consequently, the prognosis for HCC remains notably unfavorable. The endorsement of sorafenib and PD-L1 inhibitors for HCC signifies the onset of a new era embracing immunotherapy and targeted treatment approaches for this condition. Hence, comprehending the mechanisms underpinning targeted immune combination therapy has become exceedingly vital for the prospective management of HCC patients. This article initially presents a triumphant instance of curative treatment involving the combination of TKI and PD-1 inhibitor subsequent to liver resection, targeting an advanced stage HCC as classified by the BCLC staging system. The case patient carries a decade-long history of hepatitis B, having undergone a regimen of 20 courses of treatments involving apatinib and camrelizumab. Throughout the treatment period, no occurrences of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) were noted. Subsequently, the patient underwent a left hepatectomy. Following the hepatectomy, their serum AFP levels have consistently remained within normal limits, and CT imaging has indicated the absence of tumor recurrence over a span of 36 months. The patient had been reviewed on time for two years after the operation. The last time a CT was performed for this patient in our hospital was 7 May 2021, and no new tumors were found. Follow-up is still ongoing. When applying combined targeted immune transformation therapy using TKI and ICI for a patient with BCLC advanced stage HCC, apatinib treatment serves a dual purpose. It inhibits the survival and angiogenesis of tumor cells, while also enhancing the efficacy of camrelizumab in obstructing the interaction between PD-1 and PD-L1. This restoration of T cell cytotoxicity subsequently facilitates the elimination of tumor cells, leading to an enhanced anticancer effect.
| S-EPMC10487462 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest increasing cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States and is projected to be the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States by 2030. Main risk factors include alcoholic cirrhosis, chronic hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). More than half of the patients have advanced-stage disease at presentation. Currently approved frontline systemic therapy options include sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Over the past decade, there has been a significant improvement in survival with a median overall survival of 19.2 months reported with first-line treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Based on positive results of randomized phase III HIMALAYA trial, durvalumab and tremelimumab combination could become another frontline option. Multiple frontline clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or ICI combined with other novel agents are underway. In the frontline setting, identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI-based or tyrosine kinase (TKI)-based therapy is an unmet need. Subsequent treatment is poorly defined in patients with prior ICI-based therapy since all the available second-line and beyond therapy was studied after first-line sorafenib. Frontline systemic therapy is poorly defined in certain subgroups of HCC such as Child-Pugh B and post-transplant recurrent HCC. The landscape of frontline HCC treatment is rapidly changing, and this article reviews the most recent treatment approaches to frontline therapy for advanced HCC.
| S-EPMC9006370 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Primary liver cancer, mainly consisting of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is one of common malignancies worldwide, and prevalent among the Chinese population. A diagnosis of early stage HCC has proven to be very difficult because of its insidious feature in onset and development. At the time of diagnosis, most HCC cases are locally advanced and/or distant metastatic, which results in difficulty to be treated and poor prognosis. For advanced HCC, systemic therapy is frequently adopted as an important palliative method. In recent years, clinical studies and observations have often reported about systemic anti-cancer therapy of advanced HCC, including molecular target therapy, systemic chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In this article, we review these treatment modalities to provide a reference for clinicians.
| S-EPMC4970483 | biostudies-literature