Dataset Information

Quantification of pleural effusions on thoracic ultrasound in acute heart failure.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Although pleural effusions are common among patients with acute heart failure, the relevance of pleural effusion size assessed on thoracic ultrasound has not been investigated systematically.

Methods

In this prospective observational study, we included patients hospitalised for acute heart failure and performed a thoracic ultrasound early after admission (thoracic ultrasound 1) and at discharge (thoracic ultrasound 2) independently of routine clinical management. A semiquantitative score was applied offline blinded to clinical findings to categorise and monitor pleural effusion size.

Results

Among 188 patients (median age 72 years, 62% men, 78% white, median left ventricular ejection fraction 38%), pleural effusions on thoracic ultrasound 1 were present in 66% of patients and decreased in size during the hospitalisation in 75% based on the pleural effusion score (P<0.0001). Higher values of the pleural effusion score were associated with higher pleural effusion volumes on computed tomography (P<0.001), higher NT-pro brain natriuretic peptide values (P=0.001) and a greater number of B-lines on lung ultrasound (P=0.004). Nevertheless, 47% of patients were discharged with persistent pleural effusions, 19% with large effusions. However, higher values of the pleural effusion score on thoracic ultrasound 2 did not identify patients at increased risk of 90-day heart failure rehospitalisations or death (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-1.19; P=0.46) whereas seven or more B-lines on lung ultrasound at discharge were independently associated with adverse events (adjusted HR 2.43, 95% CI 1.11-5.37; P=0.027).

Conclusion

Among patients with acute heart failure, pleural effusions are associated with other clinical, imaging and laboratory markers of congestion and improve with heart failure therapy. The prognostic relevance of persistent pleural effusions at discharge should be investigated in larger studies.

SUBMITTER: Lindner M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7644143 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionPleural effusions frequently signal disseminated cancer. Diagnostic markers of pleural malignancy at presentation that would assess cancer risk and would streamline diagnostic decisions remain unidentified.MethodsA consecutive cohort of 323 patients with pleural effusion (PE) from different etiologies were recruited between 2013 and 2017 and was retrospectively analyzed. Data included history, chest X-ray, and blood/pleural fluid cell counts and biochemistry. Group comparison, receiver-operator characteristics, unsupervised hierarchical clustering, binary logistic regression, and random forests were used to develop the malignant pleural effusion detection (MAPED) score. MAPED was validated in an independent retrospective UK cohort (n = 238).ResultsFive variables showed significant diagnostic power and were incorporated into the 5-point MAPED score. Age > 55 years, effusion size > 50% of the most affected lung field, pleural neutrophil count 〈 2,500/mm3, effusion protein 〉 3.5 g/dL, and effusion lactate dehydrogenase > 250 U/L, each scoring one point, predicted underlying cancer with the area under curve(AUC) = 0.819 (P < 10-15) in the derivation cohort. The integrated discrimination improvement of MAPED scores showed an increase compared to cytology (p <0.001). Decision curve analysis indicated that the MAPED score generated net clinical benefit. In the validation dataset, the AUC of MAPED scores was 0.723 ( P = 3 × 10-9) for the MAPED score. Interestingly, MAPED correctly identified 33/42(79%) of cytology-negative patients that indeed had cancer.ConclusionsThe MAPED score identifies malignant pleural effusions with satisfactory accuracy and can be used complementary to cytology to streamline diagnostic procedures.Condensed abstractDiagnostic markers for malignant pleural effusions remain uncertain. The MAPED score identifies malignant pleural effusions and complements cytology and confers no additional risk to the patient or cost to the healthcare system.

Project description:Background and objectivePleural effusions (PEs) are commonly seen in various pathologies and have a significant impact on patient health and quality of life. Unlike for malignant PEs, non-malignant PEs (NMPEs) do not have well-established guidelines. Much of the evidence base in this field is from a handful of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the majority are from retrospective cohort analyses and cases series. Cardiac related PEs fall within the entity of NMPEs and the aim of this narrative review is to gather the existing evidence in the field of congestive heart failure (CHF), pericarditis and post-cardiac injury syndrome (PCIS). This narrative review investigates the pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria and treatment options for the various cause of cardiac related PEs.MethodsThis narrative review is based on a comprehensive literature search analysing RCTs, prospective and retrospective cohort analyses and published case series.Key content and findingsCHF related PEs have a substantial mortality rate and carry a worse prognosis if the PEs are bilateral and transudative in nature. Light's criteria have often shown to misclassify transudative effusions in CHF (pseudo-exudates) and hence measuring serum-pleural albumin gradient is an invaluable tool to accurately identify transudates. Elevated serum and pleural N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has shown increasing evidence of correctly identifying PEs secondary to CHF. However, they should be considered with the pre-test probability of CHF. Therapeutic thoracentesis and indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) placement may be necessary if medical management has failed. PEs can also occur secondary to pericarditis and are often small, bilateral and exudative. PCIS also results in PEs and are commonly seen in post-coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Both entities need management of the underlying cause first, but in cases where PEs are refractory, individualised pleural interventions may be necessary.ConclusionsThis comprehensive narrative review provides valuable insights into the aetiology, diagnosis and management of PEs secondary to CHF, pericarditis and PCIS. The aim is to enhance the clinicians' knowledge of this complex and controversial topic to improve patient care of cardiac-related PEs. Ongoing trials in this field will be able to provide valuable insights.