Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: Introduction: Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are the most common abdominally based breast reconstruction procedures. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages; however, how morbidity relates to satisfaction is not well-understood. Our aim was to compare complications and patient-reported outcomes following pedicled TRAM (pTRAM), free TRAM (fTRAM), and DIEP flaps to guide flap selection.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted, and 2 independent reviewers identified comparative studies of abdominally based flaps. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, complications, and patient-reported outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted using random effects modeling with the DerSimonian and Laird method.

Results: The search retrieved 5090 articles, of which 18 were included in this review. pTRAM flaps trended toward a higher risk of abdominal bulge/hernia compared with DIEP flaps, particularly in low-volume hospitals. While fTRAM flaps had a higher risk of abdominal morbidity compared with DIEP flaps, relative risk decreased when obese patients were excluded and when only muscle-sparing fTRAM flaps were compared. Muscle-sparing flaps had a higher risk of flap loss than fTRAM flaps. Compared with DIEP flaps, pTRAM flaps were associated with lower general satisfaction but comparable emotional well-being.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that safety and satisfaction following abdominally based breast reconstruction depend on flap type and patient characteristics. When possible, DIEP or muscle-sparing fTRAM flaps should be performed for obese patients to decrease the risk of abdominal bulge/hernia. Although pTRAM flaps are associated with a greater risk of flap loss, they are still an appropriate option when microsurgery is not available.

SUBMITTER: He WY 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7647662 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

He Waverley Y WY   El Eter Leen L   Yesantharao Pooja P   Hung Bethany B   Owens Haley H   Persing Sarah S   Sacks Justin M JM  

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 20201029 10


<h4>Introduction</h4>Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps are the most common abdominally based breast reconstruction procedures. Each technique has its advantages and disadvantages; however, how morbidity relates to satisfaction is not well-understood. Our aim was to compare complications and patient-reported outcomes following pedicled TRAM (pTRAM), free TRAM (fTRAM), and DIEP flaps to guide flap selection.<h4>Methods</h4>A  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC11000767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7984836 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3171264 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8222976 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4170731 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6919368 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8245972 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7612240 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7139674 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11199135 | biostudies-literature