Dataset Information

Tumor Necrosis Factor Induces Obliterative Pulmonary Vascular Disease in a Novel Model of Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Connective tissue disease (CTD)-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is the second most common etiology of PAH and carries a poor prognosis. Recently, it has been shown that female human tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-transgenic (Tg) mice die of cardiopulmonary disease by 6 months of age. This study was undertaken to characterize this pathophysiology and assess its potential as a novel model of CTD-PAH.

Methods

Histologic analysis was performed on TNF-Tg and wild-type (WT) mice to characterize pulmonary vascular and right ventricular (RV) pathology (n = 40 [4-5 mice per group per time point]). Mice underwent right-sided heart catheterization (n = 29) and micro-computed tomographic angiography (n = 8) to assess vascular disease. Bone marrow chimeric mice (n = 12), and anti-TNF-treated mice versus placebo-treated mice (n = 12), were assessed. RNA sequencing was performed on mouse lung tissue (n = 6).

Results

TNF-Tg mice displayed a pulmonary vasculopathy marked by collagen deposition (P < 0.001) and vascular occlusion (P < 0.001) with associated RV hypertrophy (P < 0.001) and severely increased RV systolic pressure (mean ± SD 75.1 ± 19.3 mm Hg versus 26.7 ± 1.7 mm Hg in WT animals; P < 0.0001). TNF-Tg mice had increased α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) staining, which corresponded to proliferation and loss of von Willebrand factor (vWF)-positive endothelial cells (P < 0.01). There was an increase in α-SMA-positive, vWF-positive cells (P < 0.01), implicating endothelial-mesenchymal transition. Bone marrow chimera experiments revealed that mesenchymal but not bone marrow-derived cells are necessary to drive this process. Treatment with anti-TNF therapy halted the progression of disease. This pathology closely mimics human CTD-PAH, in which patient lungs demonstrate increased TNF signaling and significant similarities in genomic pathway dysregulation.

Conclusion

The TNF-Tg mouse represents a novel model of CTD-PAH, recapitulates key disease features, and can serve as a valuable tool for discovery and assessment of therapeutics.

SUBMITTER: Bell RD

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7652720 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesFew studies have focused on pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with connective tissue diseases (CTDs). The optimal treatment for CTD-PAH has yet to be established.DesignMeta-analysis of the data from evaluations of treatment for PAH generally (19 studies) and CTD-PAH specifically (nine studies) to compare the effects of pulmonary vasodilative PAH agents. MEDLINE, EMBASE and BIOSIS were searched. English-language full-text articles published between January 1990 and August 2012 were eligible.SettingInternational.ParticipantsPatients with PAH generally (n=3073) and CTD-PAH specifically (n=678).Primary outcome measureExercise capacity (6 min walk distance, 6 MWD).ResultsPatients with PAH (all forms) had mean age 32-55 years (women, 61-87%); CTD-PAH patients had mean age 45-55 years (women, 74-95%). Overall estimate of mean change in 6 MWD from baseline (95% CI) for the active treatment group versus the control group in all patients with PAH was 34.6 m (27.4-41.9 m). Pooled mean differences from the results for patients receiving placebo by subgroup of patients receiving phosphodiesterase (PDE)-5 inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and prostacyclin (PGI2) analogues were 22.4-45.5, 39.5-44.2 and 12.4-64.9 m, respectively. Overall estimate of mean difference between changes in 6 MWD in patients with CTD-PAH was 34.2 m (23.3-45.0 m). Pooled mean differences by subgroup of patients receiving PDE-5 inhibitors, ERAs and PGI2 analogues in patients with CTD-PAH were 37.0-47.1, 14.1-21.7 and 21.0-108.0 m, respectively. ERAs were less effective in patients with CTD-PAH than all-form patients with PAH: 14.1 m (-4.4-32.6 m) vs 39.5 m (19.5-59.6 m) for bosentan and 21.7 m (2.2-41.3 m) vs 44.2 m (30.2-58.2 m) for ambrisentan.ConclusionsAll three types of PAH agent are effective. However, ERAs may be a less effective choice against CTD-PAH; further studies are needed. Limitations include the limited number of studies for some agents and for patients with CTD-PAH.