Dataset Information

Let Sleeping Patients Lie, avoiding unnecessary overnight vitals monitoring using a clinically based deep-learning model.

ABSTRACT: Impaired sleep for hospital patients is an all too common reality. Sleep disruptions due to unnecessary overnight vital sign monitoring are associated with delirium, cognitive impairment, weakened immunity, hypertension, increased stress, and mortality. It is also one of the most common complaints of hospital patients while imposing additional burdens on healthcare providers. Previous efforts to forgo overnight vital sign measurements and improve patient sleep used providers' subjective stability assessment or utilized an expanded, thus harder to retrieve, set of vitals and laboratory results to predict overnight clinical risk. Here, we present a model that incorporates past values of a small set of vital signs and predicts overnight stability for any given patient-night. Using data obtained from a multi-hospital health system between 2012 and 2019, a recurrent deep neural network was trained and evaluated using ~2.3 million admissions and 26 million vital sign assessments. The algorithm is agnostic to patient location, condition, and demographics, and relies only on sequences of five vital sign measurements, a calculated Modified Early Warning Score, and patient age. We achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.966 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.956-0.967) on the retrospective testing set, and 0.971 (95% CI 0.965-0.974) on the prospective set to predict overnight patient stability. The model enables safe avoidance of overnight monitoring for ~50% of patient-nights, while only misclassifying 2 out of 10,000 patient-nights as stable. Our approach is straightforward to deploy, only requires regularly obtained vital signs, and delivers easily actionable clinical predictions for a peaceful sleep in hospitals.

SUBMITTER: Toth V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7666176 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Let Sleeping Patients Lie, avoiding unnecessary overnight vitals monitoring using a clinically based deep-learning model.

Tóth Viktor V Meytlis Marsha M Barnaby Douglas P DP Bock Kevin R KR Oppenheim Michael I MI Al-Abed Yousef Y McGinn Thomas T Davidson Karina W KW Becker Lance B LB Hirsch Jamie S JS Zanos Theodoros P TP

NPJ digital medicine 20201113 1

Impaired sleep for hospital patients is an all too common reality. Sleep disruptions due to unnecessary overnight vital sign monitoring are associated with delirium, cognitive impairment, weakened immunity, hypertension, increased stress, and mortality. It is also one of the most common complaints of hospital patients while imposing additional burdens on healthcare providers. Previous efforts to forgo overnight vital sign measurements and improve patient sleep used providers' subjective stabilit ...[more]

PMID: 33299116

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundEarly studies have demonstrated the potential of deep learning in bringing revolutionary changes in medical analysis. However, it is unknown which deep learning based diagnostic pattern is more effective for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions (BLs) and can assist radiologists to reduce unnecessary biopsies.MethodsA total of 506 malignant BLs and 557 benign BLs were enrolled in this study after excluding incomplete ultrasound images. 396 malignant BLs and 447 benign BLs were included in the training cohort while 110 malignant and 110 benign BLs were included in the validation cohort. All BLs in the training and validation cohort were biopsy-proven. The most common convolutional neural networks (VGG-16 and VGG-19) were applied to identify malignant and benign BLs using grey-scale ultrasound images. Two radiologists determined the malignant (suggestion for biopsy) and benign (suggestion for follow-up) BLs with a 2-step reading session. The first step was based on conventional ultrasound (US) images alone to make a biopsy or follow-up decision. The second step was to take deep learning results into account for the decision adjustment. If a deep learning result of a first-classified benign BL was above the cut-off value, then it was re-classified as malignant.ResultsIn terms of area under the curve (AUC), the VGG-19 model yielded the best diagnostic performance in both training [0.939, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.924-0.954] and testing dataset (0.959, 95% CI: 0.937-0.982). With the aid of deep learning models, the AUC of radiologists improved from 0.805 (95% CI: 0.744-0.865) to 0.827 (95% CI: 0.771-0.875, VGG-16) and 0.914 (95% CI: 0.871-0.957, VGG-19). The unnecessary biopsies decreased from 10.0% (11/110) to 8.2% (9/110) (assisted by VGG-16) and 0.9% (1/110) (assisted by VGG-19).ConclusionsThe application of deep learning patterns in breast US may improve the diagnostic performance of radiologists by offering a second opinion. And thus, the assist of deep learning algorithm can considerably reduce the unnecessary biopsy rate in the clinical management of breast lesions.

Project description:A proper echocardiographic study requires several video clips recorded from different acquisition angles for observation of the complex cardiac anatomy. However, these video clips are not necessarily labeled in a database. Identification of the acquired view becomes the first step of analyzing an echocardiogram. Currently, there is no consensus whether the mislabeled samples can be used to create a feasible clinical prediction model of ejection fraction (EF). The aim of this study was to test two types of input methods for the classification of images, and to test the accuracy of the prediction model for EF in a learning database containing mislabeled images that were not checked by observers. We enrolled 340 patients with five standard views (long axis, short axis, 3-chamber view, 4-chamber view and 2-chamber view) and 10 images in a cycle, used for training a convolutional neural network to classify views (total 17,000 labeled images). All DICOM images were rigidly registered and rescaled into a reference image to fit the size of echocardiographic images. We employed 5-fold cross validation to examine model performance. We tested models trained by two types of data, averaged images and 10 selected images. Our best model (from 10 selected images) classified video views with 98.1% overall test accuracy in the independent cohort. In our view classification model, 1.9% of the images were mislabeled. To determine if this 98.1% accuracy was acceptable for creating the clinical prediction model using echocardiographic data, we tested the prediction model for EF using learning data with a 1.9% error rate. The accuracy of the prediction model for EF was warranted, even with training data containing 1.9% mislabeled images. The CNN algorithm can classify images into five standard views in a clinical setting. Our results suggest that this approach may provide a clinically feasible accuracy level of view classification for the analysis of echocardiographic data.

Project description:BackgroundStudies of clinical effectiveness have demonstrated the many benefits of programmes that avoid unnecessary hospitalisations. Therefore, it is imperative to examine the factors influencing implementation of these programmes to ensure these benefits are realised across different healthcare contexts and settings. Numerous factors may act as determinants of implementation success or failure (facilitators and barriers), by either obstructing or enabling changes in healthcare delivery. Understanding the relationships between these determinants is needed to design and tailor strategies that integrate effective programmes into routine practice. Our aims were to describe the implementation determinants for hospital avoidance programmes for people with chronic conditions and the relationships between these determinants.MethodsAn electronic search of four databases was conducted from inception to October 2019, supplemented by snowballing for additional articles. Data were extracted using a structured data extraction tool and risk of bias assessed using the Hawker Tool. Thematic synthesis was undertaken to identify determinants of implementation success or failure for hospital avoidance programmes for people with chronic conditions, which were categorised according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The relationships between these determinants were also mapped.ResultsThe initial search returned 3537 articles after duplicates were removed. After title and abstract screening, 123 articles underwent full-text review. Thirteen articles (14 studies) met the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis yielded 23 determinants of implementation across the five CFIR domains. 'Availability of resources', 'compatibility and fit', and 'engagement of interprofessional team' emerged as the most prominent determinants across the included studies. The most interconnected implementation determinants were the 'compatibility and fit' of interventions and 'leadership influence' factors.ConclusionsEvidence is emerging for how chronic condition hospital avoidance programmes can be successfully implemented and scaled across different settings and contexts. This review provides a summary of key implementation determinants and their relationships. We propose a hypothesised causal loop diagram to represent the relationship between determinants within a complex adaptive system.Trial registrationPROSPERO 162812.

Dataset Information

Let Sleeping Patients Lie, avoiding unnecessary overnight vitals monitoring using a clinically based deep-learning model.

Publications

Let Sleeping Patients Lie, avoiding unnecessary overnight vitals monitoring using a clinically based deep-learning model.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets