Patient-Reported Outcomes in ATLAS and FLAIR Participants on Long-Acting Regimens of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Over 48 Weeks.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Murray M
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7667137 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Patient-Reported Outcomes in ATLAS and FLAIR Participants on Long-Acting Regimens of Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Over 48 Weeks.
Murray Miranda M Antela Antonio A Mills Anthony A Huang Jenny J Jäger Hans H Bernal Enrique E Bernal Enrique E Lombaard Johan J Katner Harold H Walmsley Sharon S Khuong-Josses Marie-Aude MA Hudson Krischan K Dorey David D Griffith Sandy S Spreen William W Vanveggel Simon S Shaefer Mark M Margolis David D Chounta Vasiliki V
AIDS and behavior 20201201 12
The phase 3 ATLAS and FLAIR studies demonstrated that maintenance with Long-Acting (LA) intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine is non-inferior in efficacy to current antiretroviral (CAR) oral therapy. Both studies utilized Patient-Reported Outcome instruments to measure treatment satisfaction (HIVTSQ) and acceptance (ACCEPT general domain), health status (SF-12), injection tolerability/acceptance (PIN), and treatment preference. In pooled analyses, LA-treated patients (n = 591) demonstrated ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundAdvances in HIV-1 therapeutics have led to the development of a range of daily oral treatment regimens, which share similar high efficacy rates. Consequently, more emphasis is being placed upon the individual's experience of treatment and impact on quality of life. The first long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 (long-acting cabotegravir + rilpivirine [CAB + RPV LA]) may address challenges associated with oral treatment for HIV-1, such as stigma, pill burden/fatigue, drug-food interactions, and adherence. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected in an HIV-1 clinical trial (ATLAS-2M; NCT03299049) comparing participants' experience with two dosing regimens (every 4 weeks [Q4W] vs. every 8 weeks [Q8W]) of CAB + RPV LA are presented herein.MethodsPRO endpoints evaluated through 48 weeks of therapy included treatment satisfaction (HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [HIVTSQ]), treatment acceptance ("General Acceptance" domain of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance [ACCEPT®] questionnaire), acceptability of injections (Perception of Injection [PIN] questionnaire), treatment preference (questionnaire), and reasons for switching to/continuing long-acting therapy (exploratory endpoint; questionnaire). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive CAB + RPV LA Q8W or Q4W. Results were stratified by prior CAB + RPV exposure in either preplanned or post hoc analyses.ResultsOverall, 1045 participants were randomized to the Q8W (n = 522) and Q4W (n = 523) regimens; 37% (n = 391/1045) had previously received CAB + RPV in ATLAS. For participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure, large increases from baseline were reported in treatment satisfaction in both long-acting arms (HIVTSQ status version), with Q8W dosing statistically significantly favored at Weeks 24 (p = 0.036) and 48 (p = 0.004). Additionally, improvements from baseline were also observed in the "General Acceptance" domain of the ACCEPT questionnaire in both long-acting arms for participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between arms at either timepoint (Week 24, p = 0.379; Week 48, p = 0.525). Significant improvements (p < 0.001) in the "Acceptance of Injection Site Reactions" domain of the PIN questionnaire were observed from Week 8 to Weeks 24 and 48 in both arms for participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure. Participants with prior CAB + RPV exposure reported high treatment satisfaction (mean [HIVTSQ status version]: Q8W 62.2/66.0; Q4W 62.0/66.0), treatment acceptance (mean: Q8W 89.3/100; Q4W 91.2/100), and acceptance of injection site reactions (mean [5 = not at all acceptable; 1 = totally acceptable]: Q8W 1.72; Q4W 1.59) at baseline/Week 8 that were maintained over time. Participants without prior CAB + RPV exposure who received Q8W dosing preferred this regimen over oral CAB + RPV (98%, n = 300/306). Among those with prior Q4W exposure, 94% (n = 179/191) preferred Q8W dosing versus Q4W dosing (3%, n = 6/191) or oral CAB + RPV (2%, n = 4/191).ConclusionsBoth long-acting regimens provided high treatment satisfaction and acceptance, irrespective of prior CAB + RPV exposure, with most participants preferring Q8W dosing over both the Q4W regimen and their previous daily oral regimen. The PRO data collected at Week 48 support the therapeutic potential of CAB + RPV LA.FundingViiV Healthcare and Janssen.Trial registrationATLAS-2M: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03299049, registered October 2, 2017.
| S-EPMC8563641 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundEfficacy and safety of long-acting cabotegravir (CAB) + rilpivirine (RPV) every 8 weeks (Q8W) versus daily oral standard of care (SoC) maintenance in treatment-experienced individuals with virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) has not been directly compared in randomized clinical trials. This analysis aimed to indirectly compare these regimens.MethodsAn adjusted indirect treatment comparison of CAB + RPV Q8W with daily oral SoC was performed, using Phase 3 data from studies of CAB + RPV every 4 weeks (Q4W) vs SoC (ATLAS/FLAIR, n = 591 per group) and a Phase 3b trial of CAB + RPV Q8W vs Q4W (ATLAS-2M [excluding participants with prior CAB + RPV exposure]; n = 327 per group). Eligible participants were virologically suppressed (viral load < 50 HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) copies/mL), treatment-experienced individuals with HIV-1-infection. Treatment efficacy and safety assessments at Week 48 included virologic suppression and lack of virologic suppression (proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL or ≥ 50 copies/mL, respectively; both as per FDA snapshot algorithm), CD4-cell count change from baseline, no virologic data, discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), and overall AEs, serious AEs and Grade 3-5 AEs excluding injection-site reactions. A subgroup analysis stratified by baseline third active drug class was performed.ResultsBaseline characteristics between the Q4W arms of ATLAS/FLAIR and ATLAS-2M showed no significant differences or differences were not judged to be clinically relevant, apart from participants switching from a baseline third active drug class; more participants switched from integrase strand inhibitors in ATLAS/FLAIR, and from non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in ATLAS-2M. Injections of CAB + RPV Q8W showed no significant differences across efficacy and safety outcomes versus daily oral SoC. Univariate subgroup analysis found there were no significant differences on virologic suppression or lack of virologic suppression for any baseline third active drug class subgroup. These results suggest that CAB + RPV Q8W is non-inferior to daily oral SoC.ConclusionsThis analysis supports the therapeutic potential of CAB + RPV Q8W for virologically suppressed people living with HIV-1 infection seeking an alternative maintenance treatment option to daily oral SoC.Trial registrationNCT02938520, NCT02951052, NCT03299049.
| S-EPMC9066757 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Background Switching to cabotegravir long-acting + rilpivirine long-acting (CAB LA + RPV LA) administered every month (Q1M) has demonstrated non-inferiority in viral suppression versus a range of standard of care (SoC) antiretroviral regimens, including tenofovir alafenamide based regimens, in two pivotal phase 3 clinical trials (ATLAS [NCT02951052] and FLAIR [NCT02938520]). Furthermore, CAB LA + RPV LA every 2 months (Q2M) has demonstrated non-inferiority in maintaining viral suppression compared with CAB LA + RPV LA Q1M in a phase 3b study (ATLAS-2M [NCT03299049]). As bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) was not widely used at study initiation, the regimen was not present in the SoC arms of ATLAS and FLAIR. The objective was to compare efficacy and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M to BIC/FTC/TAF using indirect treatment comparison. Methods Two switch studies appropriate for facilitating indirect comparison to BIC/FTC/TAF were identified via systematic literature review (Molina et al. 2018 [NCT02603120] and Sax et al. 2020 [NCT03110380]). Indirect comparison using a generalisation of Bucher’s methodology to calculate relative risk, odds ratio, and risk differences in efficacy (Week 48 HIV RNA < 50 c/mL and ≥50 c/mL per FDA Snapshot approach and CD4+ cell change from baseline) and safety (discontinuation due to adverse events [AEs] and overall and serious AEs excluding injection site reactions [ISRs]) was conducted. Results for CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M in ATLAS-2M participants with prior integrase inhibitor (INI) exposure, but without prior CAB exposure, were indirectly compared to those with prior INI use in ATLAS and FLAIR via the common CAB LA + RPV LA Q1M comparator and were then indirectly compared to BIC/FTC/TAF via the INI comparator (Figure 1). Results No statistically significant differences in virologic failure, virologic suppression, CD4+ cell change, discontinuations due to AEs, and non-ISR serious/non-serious AEs were found between CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M and BIC/FTC/TAF (Table 1). Conclusion Indirect treatment comparison indicated efficacy and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA Q2M is not different from BIC/FTC/TAF. These regimens will be further compared in a randomized head-to-head non-inferiority trial (SOLAR, NCT04542070). Disclosures Sonya J. Snedecor, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Other Financial or Material Support, Author’s employer, OPEN Health received funding to execute this study) Melanie Schroeder, MSc, ViiV Healthcare (Employee) Nicolas Van de Velde, PhD, ViiV Healthcare (Employee)
| S-EPMC8644599 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCARISEL is an implementation-effectiveness "hybrid" study examining the perspectives of people living with HIV-1 (patient study participants [PSPs]) on cabotegravir (CAB) plus rilpivirine (RPV) long-acting (LA) dosed every 2 months (Q2M) across 5 European countries.MethodsPSPs completed questionnaires on acceptability (Acceptability of Intervention Measure), appropriateness (Intervention Appropriateness Measure), and feasibility (Feasibility of Intervention Measure) at their first (Month [M] 1), third (M4), and seventh (M12) injection visits. Semistructured qualitative interviews were also conducted.ResultsOverall, 437 PSPs were enrolled, of whom 430 received treatment. Median (interquartile range) age was 44 (37-51) years, 25.3% (n = 109/430) were female (sex at birth), and 21.9% (n = 94/430) were persons of color. Across time points, PSPs found CAB + RPV LA highly acceptable, appropriate, and feasible (mean scores ≥4.47/5). Qualitative data supported these observations.ConclusionsPSPs found CAB + RPV LA Q2M to be an acceptable, appropriate, and feasible treatment option.
| S-EPMC11367594 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Long-acting injectable antiretrovirals represent a pharmacological alternative to oral formulations and an innovative clinical option to address adherence and reduce drug costs. Clinical studies in children and adolescents are characterised by ethical and logistic barriers complicating the identification of dose optimisation. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling represents a valuable tool to inform dose finding prior to clinical trials. The objective of this study was to simulate potential dosing strategies for existing long-acting injectable depot formulations of cabotegravir and rilpivirine in children and adolescents (aged 3-18 years) using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling. METHODS:Whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models were developed to represent the anatomical, physiological and molecular processes and age-related changes in children and adolescents through allometric equations. Models were validated for long-acting injectable intramuscular cabotegravir and rilpivirine in adults. Subsequently, the anatomy and physiology of children and adolescents were validated against available literature. The optimal doses of monthly administration of cabotegravir and rilpivirine were identified in children and adolescents, to achieve trough concentrations over the target concentrations derived in a recent efficacy trial of the same formulations. RESULTS:Pharmacokinetic data generated through the physiologically-based pharmacokinetic simulations were similar to observed clinical data in adults. Optimal doses of long-acting injectable antiretrovirals cabotegravir and rilpivirine were predicted using the release rate observed for existing clinical formulations, for different weight groups of children and adolescents. The intramuscular loading dose and maintenance dose of cabotegravir ranged from 200 to 600 mg and from 100 to 250 mg, respectively, and for rilpivirine it ranged from 250 to 550 mg and from 150 to 500 mg, respectively, across various weight groups of children ranging from 15 to 70 kg. CONCLUSIONS:The reported findings represent a rational platform for the identification of suitable dosing strategies and can inform prospective clinical investigation of long-acting injectable formulations in children and adolescents.
| S-EPMC5701864 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveEfficacy and safety of long-acting cabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) dosed intramuscularly every 4 or 8 weeks has been demonstrated in three Phase 3 trials. Here, factors associated with virologic failure at Week 48 were evaluated post hoc.Design and methodsData from 1039 adults naive to long-acting CAB+RPV were pooled in a multivariable analysis to examine the influence of baseline viral and participant factors, dosing regimen and drug concentrations on confirmed virologic failure (CVF) occurrence using a logistic regression model. In a separate model, baseline factors statistically associated with CVF were further evaluated to understand CVF risk when present alone or in combination.ResultsOverall, 1.25% (n = 13/1039) of participants experienced CVF. Proviral RPV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs), HIV-1 subtype A6/A1, higher BMI (associated with Week 8 CAB trough concentration) and lower Week 8 RPV trough concentrations were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with increased odds of CVF (all except RPV trough are knowable at baseline). Few participants (0.4%) with zero or one baseline factor had CVF. Only a combination of at least two baseline factors (observed in 3.4%; n = 35/1039) was associated with increased CVF risk (25.7%, n = 9/35).ConclusionCVF is an infrequent multifactorial event, with a rate of approximately 1% in the long-acting CAB+RPV arms across Phase 3 studies (FLAIR, ATLAS and ATLAS-2M) through Week 48. Presence of at least two of proviral RPV RAMs, HIV-1 subtype A6/A1 and/or BMI at least 30 kg/m2 was associated with increased CVF risk. These findings support the use of long-acting CAB+RPV in routine clinical practice.
| S-EPMC8270504 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCabotegravir and rilpivirine are 2 long-acting (LA) antiretrovirals that can be administered intramuscularly; their interaction with rifampicin, a first-line antituberculosis agent, has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to simulate and predict drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between these LA antiretroviral agents and rifampicin using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling.MethodsThe designed PBPK models were qualified (according to European Medicines Agency guidelines) against observed data for oral formulations of cabotegravir, rilpivirine, and rifampicin. Induction potential of rifampicin was also qualified by comparing the DDI between oral cabotegravir and oral rilpivirine with rifampicin. Qualified PBPK models were utilized for pharmacokinetic prediction of DDIs.ResultsPBPK models predicted a reduction in both area under the curve (AUC0-28 days) and trough concentration (Ctrough, 28th day) of LA cabotegravir of 41%-46% for the first maintenance dose coadministered with 600 mg once-daily oral rifampicin. Rilpivirine concentrations were predicted to decrease by 82% for both AUC0-28 days and Ctrough, 28th day following the first maintenance dose when coadministered with rifampicin.ConclusionsThe developed PBPK models predicted the theoretical effect of rifampicin on cabotegravir and rilpivirine LA intramuscular formulations. According to these simulations, it is likely that coadministration of rifampicin with these LA formulations will result in subtherapeutic concentrations of both drugs.
| S-EPMC6500558 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Abstract Intramuscular long-acting antiretroviral drugs can improve adherence to lifelong antiretroviral treatment. Nevertheless, adipose tissue thickness and distribution play a critical role with injectable drugs. We describe a virological failure with cabotegravir and rilpivirine in a Black African woman with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with gynoid fat distribution (ie, adipose tissue prevailing in the pelvis and hip area) and body mass index <30 kg/m2.
| S-EPMC10199109 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Purpose of reviewCabotegravir (CAB) and rilpivirine (RPV) is the first long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (ART) option approved for virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1. In addition, long-acting CAB is a promising agent for HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This review focuses on phase 3 clinical trial results and implementation considerations for these long-acting ART and PrEP strategies.Recent findingsLong-acting CAB and RPV administered every 4 weeks demonstrated noninferiority to oral ART through week 96 in both the ATLAS and FLAIR studies, whereas ATLAS-2M found similar efficacy through 96 weeks when the long-acting injectable ART was administered every 8 weeks instead of every 4 weeks. For prevention, two phase 3 trials were stopped early due to fewer incident HIV infections in participants receiving long-acting CAB every 8 weeks compared with daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine for PrEP. The long-acting therapies were well tolerated across all clinical trials.SummaryClinical trial results support the use of long-acting CAB for HIV PrEP and long-acting CAB and RPV as a switch strategy for adults with HIV-1 who are first virologically suppressed with oral ART. Implementation challenges persist, and data are urgently needed in populations who may benefit most from long-acting therapy, including adolescents, pregnant individuals, and those with barriers to medication adherence.
| S-EPMC8694245 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPharmacokinetic data are lacking for progestin-releasing subdermal contraceptive implants when used with either rilpivirine- or darunavir/ritonavir-based ART.ObjectivesTo characterize the pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel or levonorgestrel implants when administered with these ART regimens over 48 weeks.Patients and methodsTwo separate, parallel, three-group, non-randomized, pharmacokinetic studies evaluated either etonogestrel or levonorgestrel in women receiving rilpivirine- or darunavir-based ART compared with women without HIV (control group). Participants on ART were switched to rilpivirine-based ART with a run-in period of 6 weeks or darunavir-based ART with a run-in of 2 weeks prior to implant insertion. Plasma was collected on Day 0, and 1, 4, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks post-insertion. Plasma progestin concentrations were compared between ART and control groups by geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% CI.ResultsAt the primary endpoint of Week 24, progestin concentrations were similar between the rilpivirine and control groups [etonogestrel: 1.18 (0.99-1.37); levonorgestrel: 1.16 (0.97-1.33)]. At Week 24, progestin exposure was higher in the darunavir groups compared with the control group [etonogestrel: 2.56 (1.69-3.28); levonorgestrel: 1.89 (1.38-2.29)]. Results remained consistent through to Week 48. No differences in etonogestrel-related adverse events were observed, but both ART groups experienced more menstrual abnormalities versus the control group with levonorgestrel.ConclusionsEtonogestrel and levonorgestrel concentrations were not altered by rilpivirine-based ART. Although progestin concentrations were higher in the ART groups containing ritonavir-boosted darunavir, no implant-related serious adverse events were observed. Both progestin-releasing implants are an appropriate contraceptive option with either rilpivirine- or darunavir/ritonavir-based ART.
| S-EPMC10205603 | biostudies-literature