Therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord-derived stem cells for diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Stem cell therapy provides great hope for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). DM is a seriously alarming metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia and ? cell dysfunction. Efficient novel therapeutic modalities to treat DM are indeed warranted. Stem cells (SC) derived from the umbilical cord specifically provide several advantages and unique characteristics being a readily available non-invasive source, with an additional credit for their banking potential. This meta-analysis study aims to provide a focused assessment for therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord (UC)-derived SC-transplantation, namely Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) for DM. METHODS:The clinical efficacy was evaluated based on glycemic control status (reflected on HbA1c%) and ? cell function (reflected on C-peptide levels), as well as the daily insulin requirement in diabetic patients after receiving UC-derived SC-transplantation compared to baseline values. Moreover, we assessed these outcome measures in patients who received such intervention compared to those who did not receive it in randomized/non-randomized controlled clinical trials. We employed a random-effects model and standardized mean difference for this meta-analysis. RESULTS:Eleven eligible clinical studies were included; WJ-MSCs (6 studies; 172 patients including 71 controls) and UCB (5 studies; 74 patients including 15 controls). WJ-MSCs significantly improved HbA1c% (pooled-estimate -?1.085; 95%CI (-?1.513, -?0.657); p < 0.001) and C-peptide levels (pooled-estimate 1.008; 95%CI (0.475, 1.541); p < 0.001), as well as the daily insulin-requirement (pooled-estimate -?2.027; 95%CI (-?3.32, -?0.733); p?=?0.002). On the contrary, UCB was found to be uniformly ineffective; HbA1c% (pooled-estimate -?0.091, 95%CI (-?0.454, 0.271); p?=?0.622), significantly deteriorated C-peptide levels (pooled-estimate -?0.789; 95%CI (-?1.252, -?0.325); p < 0.001) and daily insulin-requirement (pooled-estimate 0.916; 95%CI (0.247, 1.585); p?=?0.007). All these observations remained consistent when we carried out sub-group meta-analysis for T1DM and T2DM and also when we compared patients who received WJ-MSCs or UCB to controls. CONCLUSIONS:The results of our meta-analysis provide a clear evidence for the superior efficacy of WJ-MSCs over UCB in DM. This sheds lights on the importance to consider banking of WJ-MSCs together with the well-established routine UCB-banking, especially for those with family history of DM. Additionally, further clinical studies are required to investigate therapeutic efficacy of selected/enriched UCB-derived cell populations with immunomodulatory/regenerative potential in DM.
SUBMITTER: Kassem DH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7667841 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
ACCESS DATA