Dataset Information

Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for recurrent glioblastoma as part of a 3-arm sequential accrual clinical trial: NABTC 05-02.

ABSTRACT: Background:Receptor tyrosine kinases such as epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) and their downstream signaling pathways such as the Ras-Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway play important roles in glioblastoma (GBM). This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of sorafenib (Ras/Raf/MAPK inhibitor) in combination with erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) for treatment of recurrent GBMs. Methods:Patients with recurrent GBM were eligible. A novel sequential accrual trial design was used, where patients were sequentially accrued into separate treatment arms in phase I and phase II investigations to optimize recruitment efficiency. In phase I, a standard 3 + 3 format was used to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and investigate pharmacokinetics. Phase II followed a 2-stage design with the primary endpoint being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6). Results:Sixteen patients were recruited for phase I, and the MTD was determined to be sorafenib 200 mg twice daily and erlotinib 100 mg once daily. DLTs include Grade 3 hypertension, Grade 3 elevated liver transaminases, and Grade 4 elevated lipase. While erlotinib did not affect sorafenib levels, sorafenib reduced erlotinib levels. In phase II, 3 of 19 stage 1 participants were progression free at 6 months. This did not meet the predetermined efficacy endpoint, and the trial was terminated. Conclusion:This study identified the MTD and DLTs for sorafenib and erlotinib combination therapy for recurrent GBMs; however, efficacy data did not meet the primary endpoint. This study also demonstrates the feasibility of a novel sequential accrual clinical trial design that optimizes patient recruitment for multiarm studies, which is particularly effective for multicenter clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Chen H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7668489 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for recurrent glioblastoma as part of a 3-arm sequential accrual clinical trial: NABTC 05-02.

Chen Huanwen H Kuhn John J Lamborn Kathleen R KR Abrey Lauren E LE DeAngelis Lisa M LM Lieberman Frank F Robins H Ian HI Chang Susan M SM Yung W K Alfred WKA Drappatz Jan J Mehta Minesh P MP Levin Victor A VA Aldape Kenneth K Dancey Janet E JE Wright John J JJ Prados Michael D MD Cloughesy Timothy F TF Wen Patrick Y PY Gilbert Mark R MR

Neuro-oncology advances 20200101 1

<h4>Background</h4>Receptor tyrosine kinases such as epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFRs) and their downstream signaling pathways such as the Ras-Raf-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway play important roles in glioblastoma (GBM). This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of sorafenib (Ras/Raf/MAPK inhibitor) in combination with erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor) for treatment of recurrent GBMs.<h4>Methods</h4>Patients with recurrent GBM were eligible. A novel se ...[more]

PMID: 33235994

Similar Datasets

Project description:Abstract BACKGROUND Drug development in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (rGBM) is challenging. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs) short survival horizons and limited life-prolonging treatment options may delay accrual and introduce bias through differential dropout of control patients. Comparing results of a single-arm Phase 2b trial of intratumoral delivery of MDNA55 (an interleukin-4 receptor targeted fusion protein) to an external control arm, we sought early efficacy insights and consideration by the FDA of incorporating an ECA in a Phase 3 registrational trial. METHODS Using propensity score weighting, we compared rGBM patients from the Phase 2b trial (NCT02858895) (2017-2019) to patients from rGBM registries who had received standard of care therapies (2011-2019) and met eligibility requirements. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model with 11 covariates. We compared the propensity score weighted groups according to demographic and disease attributes before and after weighting and compared overall survival between the two groups. RESULTS Through propensity score weighting, 43 (98%, 43/44) MDNA55 patients and 40.80 weighted ECA patients (from 62 unweighted registry patients) were identified for comparison. MDNA55 and ECA patients were balanced on all baseline characteristics (i.e., standardized mean difference ≤ 0.15). Compared to ECA patients, MDNA55 patients had a 37% lower hazard of death (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.39,1.02). CONCLUSION In advance of a Phase 3 trial, comparison of Phase 2b trial results to an ECA suggests that MDNA55 may be efficacious in rGBM. In view of the known challenges associated with drug development for rGBM, these results provided a proof-of-concept for the design of a novel hybrid Phase 3 trial. This planned Phase 3 trial incorporates propensity score weighting to create a composite hybrid randomized and external control arm, an approach preferred by the FDA over full replacement of a randomized control with an external control.

Project description:Abstract OBJECTIVE To report the single center experience of three adult subjects receiving ONC-201 as part of the ONC018 expanded access clinical trial [NCT03134131]. BACKGROUND ONC-201 is an oral investigational antagonist against the D2 dopamine receptor that has shown encouraging results for malignant gliomas harboring the H3K27M mutation in the H3 histone complex. Responses have been reported in pediatric subjects with such tumors. H3K27M tumors are generally located in the midline of the central nervous system which co-localize, for unknown reasons, with key dopaminergic pathways. An expanded access clinical trial (ONC018) was available to eligible patients allowing them access to this agent pending FDA review. DESIGN/METHODS Our site enrolled three subjects on the ONC018 trial. We present the demographic, clinical, and molecular characteristics for our enrolled subjects. We report the tolerability, adverse events, and outcome measures including survival, time-to-progression, response, Karnofsky Performance Status [KPS] and quality-of-life measured by the MD Anderson symptom inventory instrument [MDASI]. RESULTS Three subjects were registered at our site onto ONC018 with age range 18-44yrs, 2/3 female, residing in Norway, India and United states. Tumor locations: brainstem, corpus callosum and thalamus. Pathology: glioblastoma(3/3), MGMT methylated (2/3), IDH1 mutant (0/3), EGFR amplification (0/3) and ATRX (3/3). Median change from baseline KPS: ≤20% decrease; MDASI:2/3 experienced decrease from baseline [median 6%],consistent with improved quality of life. No clinically significant laboratory abnormalities. No serious adverse events observed in any cases. All adverse events grade I-II. CONCLUSIONS In three subjects with H3K27M-mutant malignant glioma that received ONC201 as part of this expanded access clinical trial, we found that study drug was quite tolerable. No serious adverse events nor radiographic responses were seen. Analyses of larger study cohort and additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to provide insight into the safety and efficacy of this agent for this patient population.

Dataset Information

Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for recurrent glioblastoma as part of a 3-arm sequential accrual clinical trial: NABTC 05-02.

Publications

Phase I/II study of sorafenib in combination with erlotinib for recurrent glioblastoma as part of a 3-arm sequential accrual clinical trial: NABTC 05-02.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets