Dataset Information

Coronary Angiography After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) to Evaluate the Risk of Coronary Access Impairment After TAVR-in-TAVR.

ABSTRACT: Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-in-TAVR is a possible treatment for transcatheter heart valve (THV) degeneration. However, the displaced leaflets of the first THV will create a risk plane (RP) under which the passage of a coronary catheter will be impossible. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential risk of impaired coronary access (CA) after TAVR-in-TAVR. Methods and Results We prospectively performed coronary angiography after TAVR with different THVs in 137 consecutive patients, looking where the catheter crossed the valve frame. If coronary cannulation was achieved from below the RP, the distance between valve frame and aortic wall was measured by aortic angiography. CA after TAVR-in-TAVR was defined as feasible if the catheter passed above the RP, as theoretically feasible if passed under the RP with valve-to-aorta distance >2 mm, and as unfeasible if passed under the RP with valve-to-aorta distance ?2 mm. Seventy-two patients (53%) received a Sapien 3 THV, 26 (19%) received an Evolut Pro/R THV, and 39 (28%) received an Acurate Neo THV. CA after TAVR-in-TAVR was considered feasible in 40.9% (68.1%, 19.2%, and 5.1%, respectively; P<0.001), theoretically feasible in 27.7% (8.3%, 42.3%, and 53.8%, respectively; P<0.001), and unfeasible in 31.4% (23.6%, 38.5%, and 41.1%, respectively; P=0.116). Independent predictors of impaired CA after TAVR-in-TAVR were female sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.99; 95% CI, 1.07-14.86; P=0.040), sinotubular junction diameter (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80; P<0.001), and implantation of a supra-annular THV (OR, 6.61; 95% CI, 1.98-22.03; P=0.002). Conclusions CA after TAVR-in-TAVR might be unfeasible in >30% of patients currently treated with TAVR. Patients with a small sinotubular junction and those who received a supra-annular THV are at highest risk of potential CA impairment with TAVR-in-TAVR.

SUBMITTER: Nai Fovino L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7670517 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Coronary Angiography After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) to Evaluate the Risk of Coronary Access Impairment After TAVR-in-TAVR.

Nai Fovino Luca L Scotti Andrea A Massussi Mauro M Cardaioli Francesco F Rodinò Giulio G Matsuda Yuji Y Pavei Andrea A Masiero Giulia G Napodano Massimo M Fraccaro Chiara C Fabris Tommaso T Tarantini Giuseppe G

Journal of the American Heart Association 20200624 13

Background Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-in-TAVR is a possible treatment for transcatheter heart valve (THV) degeneration. However, the displaced leaflets of the first THV will create a risk plane (RP) under which the passage of a coronary catheter will be impossible. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential risk of impaired coronary access (CA) after TAVR-in-TAVR. Methods and Results We prospectively performed coronary angiography after TAVR with different THVs in 137 ...[more]

PMID: 32578484

Similar Datasets

Project description:Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is currently being investigated as a procedural alternative to surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (SMVR). Early data from first-in-man trials with current devices suggest that TMVR is technically feasible but carries a high mortality. This is substantially different from the early success transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has seen and is related to complexities of the mitral valve anatomy, differences in pathology that require mitral valve replacement as well as the impact that mitral valve replacement has on physiology and cardiac function, irrespective of the modality by which the mitral valve is replaced. Importantly, in the case of TAVR, a less invasive method is offered to accomplish the same as the traditional surgical intervention. On the other hand, valve replacement is not the recommended treatment option for the majority of mitral valve disease, and in fact is avoided whenever possible during surgery given the shortened life expectancy and increased morbidity with mitral valve replacement. Another distinction between TAVR and TMVR is the etiology and natural progression of the underlying disease and driving factors for intervention that are vastly different between aortic and mitral valve disease. The primary aortic disease treated has been aortic stenosis, which has several etiologic factors that cause a similar physiologic dysfunction and risk. Aortic valve replacement leads to improved survival and quality of life. The primary mitral valve disease targeted is regurgitation, which occurs as a primary valve defect and as a secondary consequence of ventricular dysfunction. Primary mitral regurgitation is treated by valve repair with excellent long-term outcomes. Secondary regurgitation has poor long-term outcomes with current commonly used repair techniques and limited data exists showing that correction of the regurgitation improves survival. Adoption of TMVR will require overcoming the anatomic challenges as well as generating data that supports improved survival and/or quality of life.

Project description:Purpose To assess the technical feasibility of the use of ferumoxytol-enhanced (FE) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for vascular mapping before transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with renal impairment. Materials and Methods This was an institutional review board-approved and HIPAA-compliant study. FE MR angiography was performed at 3.0 T or 1.5 T. Unenhanced computed tomographic (CT) images were used to overlay vascular calcification on FE MR angiographic images as composite fused three-dimensional data. Image quality of the subclavian and aortoiliofemoral arterial tree and confidence in the assessment of calcification were evaluated by using a four-point scale (4 = excellent vascular definition or strong confidence). Signal intensity nonuniformity as reflected by the heterogeneity index (ratio between the mean standard deviation of luminal signal intensity and the mean luminal signal intensity), signal-to-noise ratio, and consistency of luminal diameter measurements were quantified. Findings at FE MR angiography were compared with pelvic angiograms. Results Twenty-six patients underwent FE MR angiography without adverse events. A total of 286 named vascular segments were scored. The image quality score was 4 for 99% (283 of 286) of the segments (κ = 0.9). There was moderate to strong confidence in the ability to assess vascular calcific morphology in all studies with complementary unenhanced CT. The steady-state luminal heterogeneity index was low, and signal-to-noise ratio was high. Interobserver luminal measurements were reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.98, 0.99). FE MR angiographic findings were consistent with correlative pelvic angiograms in all 16 patients for whom the latter were available. Conclusion In patients with renal impairment undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, FE MR angiography is technically feasible and offers reliable vascular mapping without exposure to iodine- or gadolinium-based contrast agents. Thus, the total cumulative dose of iodine-based contrast material is minimized and the risk of acute nephropathy is reduced. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Dataset Information

Coronary Angiography After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) to Evaluate the Risk of Coronary Access Impairment After TAVR-in-TAVR.

Publications

Coronary Angiography After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) to Evaluate the Risk of Coronary Access Impairment After TAVR-in-TAVR.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets