Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A patient-pooled meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Conflicting evidence is available on the efficacy and safety of early intravenous beta-blockers before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We performed a patient-pooled meta-analysis of trials comparing early intravenous beta-blockers with placebo or routine care in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. AIM:The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and safety outcomes of intravenous beta-blockers in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS:Four randomized trials with a total of 1150 patients were included. The main outcome was one-year death or myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes included biomarker-based infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction during follow-up, ventricular tachycardia, and a composite safety outcome (cardiogenic shock, symptomatic bradycardia, or hypotension) during hospitalization. RESULTS:One-year death or myocardial infarction was similar among beta-blocker (4.2%) and control patients (4.4%) (hazard ratio: 0.96 (95% confidence interval: 0.53-1.75, p=0.90, I2=0%). No difference was observed in biomarker-based infarct size. One-month left ventricular ejection fraction was similar, but left ventricular ejection fraction at six months was significantly higher in patients treated with early intravenous beta-blockade (52.8% versus 50.0% in the control group, p=0.03). No difference was observed in the composite safety outcome or ventricular tachycardia during hospitalization. CONCLUSION:In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, the administration of early intravenous beta-blockers was safe. However, there was no difference in the main outcome of one-year death or myocardial infarction with early intravenous beta-blockers. A larger clinical trial is warranted to confirm the definitive efficacy of early intravenous beta-blockers.

SUBMITTER: Hoedemaker NP 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7672673 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Early intravenous beta-blockers in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A patient-pooled meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Hoedemaker Niels Pg NP   Roolvink Vincent V   de Winter Robbert J RJ   van Royen Niels N   Fuster Valentin V   García-Ruiz José M JM   Er Fikret F   Gassanov Natig N   Hanada Kenji K   Okumura Ken K   Ibáñez Borja B   van 't Hof Arnoud W AW   Damman Peter P  

European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care 20190214 5


<h4>Background</h4>Conflicting evidence is available on the efficacy and safety of early intravenous beta-blockers before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. We performed a patient-pooled meta-analysis of trials comparing early intravenous beta-blockers with placebo or routine care in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.<h4>Aim</h4>The aim of this study was to evaluate the  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6692400 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4124048 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5532774 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5880555 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4990737 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC6834424 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10241275 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5898983 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8120407 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6709285 | biostudies-literature