Dataset Information

Structure in personal networks: Constructing and comparing typologies.

ABSTRACT: A recurrent finding in personal network research is that individual and social outcomes are influenced not just by the kind of people one knows, but also by how those people are connected to each other: that is, by the structure of one's personal network. The different ways in which a person's social contacts know and interact with each other reflect broader variations in personal communities and social structures, and shape patterns and processes of social capital, support, and isolation. This article proposes a method to identify typologies of network structure in large collections of personal networks. The method is illustrated with an application to six datasets collected in widely different circumstances and using various survey instruments. Results are compared with those from another recently introduced method to extract structural typologies of egocentric networks. Findings show that personal network structure can be effectively summarized using just three measures describing results of the Girvan-Newman algorithm for cohesive subgroup detection. Structural typologies can then be extracted through cluster analysis on the three variables, using well-known clustering quality statistics to select the optimal typology. Both typology detection methods considered in the article capture significant variation in personal network structures, but substantial levels of disagreement and cross-classification emerge between them. I discuss differences and similarities between the methods, and potential applications of the proposed typologies to substantive research on a variety of topics, including structures and transformations of personal communities, social support, and social capital.

SUBMITTER: Vacca R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7678817 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Structure in personal networks: Constructing and comparing typologies.

Vacca Raffaele R

Network science (Cambridge University Press) 20191104 2

A recurrent finding in personal network research is that individual and social outcomes are influenced not just by the kind of people one knows, but also by how those people are connected to each other: that is, by the structure of one's personal network. The different ways in which a person's social contacts know and interact with each other reflect broader variations in personal communities and social structures, and shape patterns and processes of social capital, support, and isolation. This ...[more]

PMID: 33224496

Similar Datasets

Project description:Personal naming practices exist in all human groups and are far from random. Rather, they continue to reflect social norms and ethno-cultural customs that have developed over generations. As a consequence, contemporary name frequency distributions retain distinct geographic, social and ethno-cultural patterning that can be exploited to understand population structure in human biology, public health and social science. Previous attempts to detect and delineate such structure in large populations have entailed extensive empirical analysis of naming conventions in different parts of the world without seeking any general or automated methods of population classification by ethno-cultural origin. Here we show how 'naming networks', constructed from forename-surname pairs of a large sample of the contemporary human population in 17 countries, provide a valuable representation of cultural, ethnic and linguistic population structure around the world. This innovative approach enriches and adds value to automated population classification through conventional national data sources such as telephone directories and electoral registers. The method identifies clear social and ethno-cultural clusters in such naming networks that extend far beyond the geographic areas in which particular names originated, and that are preserved even after international migration. Moreover, one of the most striking findings of this approach is that these clusters simply 'emerge' from the aggregation of millions of individual decisions on parental naming practices for their children, without any prior knowledge introduced by the researcher. Our probabilistic approach to community assignment, both at city level as well as at a global scale, helps to reveal the degree of isolation, integration or overlap between human populations in our rapidly globalising world. As such, this work has important implications for research in population genetics, public health, and social science adding new understandings of migration, identity, integration and social interaction across the world.

Project description:Recent advances in large datasets analysis offer new insights to modern biology allowing system-level investigation of pathologies. Here we describe a novel computational method that exploits the ever-growing amount of "omics" data to shed light on Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Neurological disorders exhibit a huge number of molecular alterations due to a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors. Classical reductionist approaches are focused on a few elements, providing a narrow overview of the etiopathogenic complexity of multifactorial diseases. On the other hand, high-throughput technologies allow the evaluation of many components of biological systems and their behaviors. Analysis of Parkinson's Disease (PD) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD) from a network perspective can highlight proteins or pathways common but differently represented that can be discriminating between the two pathological conditions, thus highlight similarities and differences.In this work we propose a strategy that exploits network community structure identified with a state-of-the-art network community discovery algorithm called InfoMap, which takes advantage of information theory principles. We used two similarity measurements to quantify functional and topological similarities between the two pathologies. We built a Similarity Matrix to highlight similar communities and we analyzed statistically significant GO terms found in clustered areas of the matrix and in network communities. Our strategy allowed us to identify common known and unknown processes including DNA repair, RNA metabolism and glucose metabolism not detected with simple GO enrichment analysis. In particular, we were able to capture the connection between mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolism (glucose and glutamate/glutamine).This approach allows the identification of communities present in both pathologies which highlight common biological processes. Conversely, the identification of communities without any counterpart can be used to investigate processes that are characteristic of only one of the two pathologies. In general, the same strategy can be applied to compare any pair of biological networks.

Dataset Information

Structure in personal networks: Constructing and comparing typologies.

Publications

Structure in personal networks: Constructing and comparing typologies.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets