Dataset Information

Alternate Dosing Protocol for Magnesium Sulfate in Obese Women With Preeclampsia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To evaluate whether obese women need greater doses of magnesium sulfate to obtain therapeutic serum concentrations for eclamptic seizure prevention.

Methods

Women with preeclampsia and a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or higher were randomly allocated to either the Zuspan regimen of magnesium sulfate (4-g intravenous [IV] loading dose, then a 1-g/h infusion) or to alternate dosing (6-g IV loading dose, then a 2-g/h infusion). Women had serum magnesium concentrations obtained at baseline, as well as after administration of magnesium sulfate at 1 hour, 4 hours, and delivery. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who had subtherapeutic serum magnesium concentrations (less than 4.8 mg/dL) 4 hours after administration. A sample size of 18 women per group was planned to compare the proportion of women with subtherapeutic serum magnesium concentrations in each group.

Results

From July 12, 2016, to March 14, 2019, 89 women with preeclampsia were screened and 37 were enrolled: 18 to the Zuspan regimen and 19 to the alternate regimen. A significantly greater proportion of women administered the Zuspan regimen had subtherapeutic serum magnesium concentrations at 4 hours (100% [95% CI 59-100] vs 63% [95% CI 41-81]; P=.01) compared with women administered the alternate higher dose regimen. At 4 hours, mean concentrations were significantly higher in the alternate regimen group (3.53 mg/dL±0.3 [Zuspan regimen] vs 4.41±0.5 [alternate regimen]; P<.01).

Conclusion

The alternate dosing regimen of a 6-g IV loading dose followed by a 2-g/h IV maintenance dose more reliably achieves therapeutic serum magnesium concentrations (as defined by a concentration of at least 4.8 mg/dL) in obese women with preeclampsia.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02835339.

SUBMITTER: Brookfield KF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7680383 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Arterial stiffness is closely related to the process of atherosclerosis, an independent cardiovascular risk factor, and predictive of future cardiovascular events and mortality. Recently, we showed that magnesium citrate supplementation results in a clinically relevant improvement of arterial stiffness. It remained unclear whether the observed effect was due to magnesium or citrate, and whether other magnesium compounds may have similar effects. Therefore, we aim to study the long-term effects of magnesium citrate, magnesium oxide and magnesium sulfate on arterial stiffness. In addition, we aim to investigate possible underlying mechanisms, including changes in blood pressure and changes in gut microbiota diversity. METHODS:In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, a total of 162 healthy overweight and slightly obese men and women will be recruited. During a 24-week intervention, individuals will be randomized to receive: magnesium citrate; magnesium oxide; magnesium sulfate (total daily dose of magnesium for each active treatment 450?mg); or placebo. The primary outcome of the study is arterial stiffness measured by the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWVc-f), which is the gold standard for quantifying arterial stiffness. Secondary outcomes are office blood pressure, measured by a continuous blood pressure monitoring device, and gut microbiota, measured in fecal samples. Measurements will be performed at baseline and at weeks 2, 12 and 24. DISCUSSION:The present study is expected to provide evidence for the effects of different available magnesium formulations (organic and inorganic) on well-established cardiovascular risk markers, including arterial stiffness and blood pressure, as well as on the human gut microbiota. As such, the study may contribute to the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in slightly obese, but otherwise healthy, individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03632590 . Retrospectively registered on 15 August 2018.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Magnesium sulfate is the ideal drug for the prevention and treatment of eclampsia. Nevertheless, the best regimen for protection against eclampsia with minimal side effects remains to be established. This study aimed to compare serum magnesium levels during intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate at 1?gram/hour versus 2?grams/hour as a maintenance dose to prevent eclampsia in pregnant and postpartum women with severe preeclampsia. METHODS:A randomized, triple-blind clinical trial was conducted, comparing serum magnesium levels during the intravenous infusion of magnesium sulfate at 1?gram/hour versus 2?grams/hour as a maintenance dose for the prevention of eclampsia in 62 pregnant and postpartum women with severe preeclampsia, 31 in each group. An intravenous loading dose of 6 grams of magnesium sulfate was administered over 30 minutes in both groups. The patients were then randomized to receive a maintenance dose of either 1 or 2?grams/hour for 24?hours. Primary outcomes consisted of serum magnesium levels at the following time points: baseline, 30 minutes, every 2 hours until the end of the first 6 hours, and every 6 hours thereafter until the termination of magnesium sulfate infusion. Side effects, maternal complications, and neonatal outcomes were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS:Serum magnesium levels were higher in the 2-gram/hour group, with a statistically significant difference from 2 hours after the beginning of the magnesium sulfate infusion (P <.05). Oliguria was the most common complication recorded in both groups, with no significant difference between the 2 regimens (RR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.49-1.56; P =?.65). No cases of eclampsia occurred. Side effects were more common in the 2-gram/hour group (RR 1.89; 95% CI: 1.04-3.41; P =?.02); however, all were mild. There were no differences between the 2 groups regarding neonatal outcomes, except for admission to neonatal intensive care, which was more frequent in the 1-gram/hour group (25% vs 6.3%; P =?.04). CONCLUSION:Magnesium sulfate therapy at the maintenance dose of 1?gram/hour was just as effective as the 2-gram maintenance dose, with fewer side effects.

Project description:Background/objectivesAlternate day fasting (ADF) is a subtype of intermittent fasting and is defined as a continuous sequence of a fast day (100% energy restriction, zero calories) and a feed day (ad libitum food consumption), resulting in roughly 36-h fasting periods. Previous studies demonstrated weight reductions and improvements of cardiovascular risk factors with ADF in obese subjects. However, rigorous data on potential endocrine, metabolic and cardiovascular effects, besides weight loss, are lacking. Therefore we aim to investigate the short- and mid- to long-term clinical and molecular effects of ADF in healthy non-obese subjects.MethodsWe will perform a prospective cohort study with an embedded randomized controlled trial (RCT) including 90 healthy subjects. Thirty of them will have performed ADF for at least 6 months (mid-term group). Sixty healthy subjects without a particular diet before enrolment will serve as the control group. These subjects will be 1:1 randomized to either continuing their current diet or performing ADF for 4 weeks. All subjects will undergo study procedures that will be repeated in RCT participants after 4 weeks. These procedures will include assessment of outcome parameters, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, measurement of endothelial function, an oral glucose tolerance test, 24-h blood pressure measurement, retinal vessel analysis, echocardiography and physical activity measurement by an accelerometer. Blood, sputum, buccal mucosa and faeces will be collected for laboratory analyses. Participants in the RCT will wear a continuous glucose monitor to verify adherence to the study intervention.Planned outcomesThe aim of this project is to investigate the effects of ADF on human physiology and molecular cellular processes. This investigation should gain in-depth mechanistic insights into the concept of ADF and form the basis for larger subsequent cohort recruitment and consecutive intervention studies.Trial registrationNCT02673515; registered 24 November 2015. Current protocol date/version: 7 February 2017/version 1.8.