Dataset Information

Impact of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia prevention: A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is frequently prescribed to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, but the administration schedule remains empirical in case of bimonthly chemotherapy such as FOLFIRINOX regimen. This pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study was performed to determine the effect of different G-CSF regimens on the incidence and duration of neutropenia following FOLFIRINOX administration in order to propose an optimal G-CSF dosing schedule.

Methods

A population PK/PD model was developed to describe individual neutrophil time course from absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) obtained in 40 advanced cancer patients receiving FOLFIRINOX regimen. The structural model considered ANC dynamics, neutropenic effect of cytotoxics and the stimulating effect of G-CSF on neutrophils. Final model estimates were used to simulate different G-CSF dosing schedules for 1000 virtual subjects. The incidence and duration of neutropenia were then calculated for different G-CSF dosing schedules.

Results

The final model successfully described the myelosuppressive effect induced by the 3 cytotoxics for all patients. Simulations showed that pegfilgrastim administration reduced the risk of severe neutropenia by 22.9% for subjects with low ANC at the start of chemotherapy. Median duration in this group was also shortened by 3.1 days when compared to absence of G-CSF. Delayed G-CSF administration was responsible for higher incidence and longer duration of neutropenia compared to absence of administration.

Conclusion

The PK/PD model well described our population's ANC data. Simulations showed that pegylated-G-CSF administration 24 hours after the end of chemotherapy seems to be the optimal schedule to reduce FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia. We also underline the potential negative effect of G-CSF maladministration.

SUBMITTER: Macaire P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7688541 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveInappropriate granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use with myelosuppressive chemotherapy has been reported. Using the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records electronic medical record database, prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim/filgrastim) use in cancer patients was assessed by febrile neutropenia risk level.MethodsPatients with nonmetastatic or metastatic breast, head/neck, colorectal, ovarian/gynecologic, lung cancer, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma who received myelosuppressive chemotherapy from June 2013 to May 2014 were included. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use with high-risk, intermediate-risk, and low-risk chemotherapy and distribution of National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk factors with intermediate-risk regimens were assessed.ResultsOverall, 86,189 patients received ?4.2 million chemotherapy cycles (high risk, 9%; intermediate risk, 48%; low risk, 43%). Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given in 24% of cycles (high risk, 59%; intermediate risk, 29%; low risk, 11%). For nonmetastatic solid tumors, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given in 78% (high risk), 31% (intermediate risk), and 6% (low risk) of cycles. For metastatic solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given in 50% (high risk), 27% (intermediate risk), and 11% (low risk) of cycles. Among patients receiving intermediate-risk regimens with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, febrile neutropenia risk factors were identified in 56% (95% confidence interval, 51.1-60.9%) of patients with nonmetastatic solid tumors (n?=?400) and in 70% (64.5-73.5%) of patients with metastatic solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n?=?400).ConclusionProphylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use was appropriately highest for high-risk regimens and lowest for low-risk regimens yet still potentially underused in high risk regimens, overused in low-risk regimens, and not appropriately targeted in intermediate-risk regimens, indicating a need for further education on febrile neutropenia risk evaluation and appropriate granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use.