Usability of EU-TIRADS in the Diagnostics of Hurthle Cell Thyroid Nodules with Equivocal Cytology.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of EU-TIRADS in two groups of nodules with equivocal cytology (categories III-V of Bethesda system), with and without Hürthle cells (HC and non-HC). The study included 162 HC and 378 non-HC nodules with determined histopathological diagnosis (17.9% and 15.6% cancers). In both groups calculated and expected risk of malignancy (RoM) for high, intermediate and benign risk categories of EU-TIRADS were concordant. RoM for low risk category was higher than expected in both groups, but especially in HC (HC: 13.9%, non-HC: 7.0%, expected: 2-4%). The majority of cancers in HC of that category were follicular thyroid carcinomas (FTC) and Hürthle cell thyroid carcinoma (HTC) (60.0% vs. non-HC: 16.7%). The diagnostic efficacy of EU-TIRADS was lower in HC (the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC): 0.621, sensitivity (SEN): 44.8%, specificity (SPC): 78.9% for high risk threshold) than in non-HC (AUC: 0.711, SEN: 61.0%, SPC: 77.7%). AUC was the highest for category V (AUC > 0.8, both groups) and the lowest for category IV (inefficient, both group). If intermediate risk category was interpreted as an indication for surgery, 25% of cancers from category III and 21.4% from category IV would not be treated in the HC group (0.0% and 7.4% from non-HC group, respectively). EU-TIRADS does not aid making clinical decisions in patients with cytologically equivocal HC nodules, particularly those classified into category IV of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC).

SUBMITTER: Slowinska-Klencka D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7690849 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature