Dataset Information

Tumour PD-L1 Expression in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: : Antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1), and its ligand, (PD-L1) have been approved recently for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although there are previous reports that addressed PD-L1 detection on tumour cells in SCLC, there is no comprehensive meta-analysis on the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in SCLC. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases to assess reports on the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and the association between PD-L1 expression and overall survival (OS). This meta-analysis included 27 studies enrolling a total of 2792 patients. The pooled estimate of PD-L1 expression was 26.0% (95% CI 17.0-37.0), (22.0% after removing outlying studies). The effect size was significantly heterogeneous (I2 = 97.4, 95% CI: 95.5-98.5, p < 0.0001).Positive PD-L1 expression was a favourable prognostic factor for SCLC but not statistically significant (HR = 0.86 (95% CI (0.49-1.50), p = 0.5880; I2 = 88.7%, p < 0.0001). Begg's funnel plots and Egger's tests indicated no publication bias across included studies (p > 0.05). Overall, there is heterogeneity in the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in SCLC tumour cells across studies. This is significantly moderated by factors such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation cut-off values, and assessment of PD-L1 staining patterns as membranous and/or cytoplasmic. There is the need for large size, prospective and multicentre studies with well-defined protocols and endpoints to advance the clinical value of PD-L1 expression in SCLC.

SUBMITTER: Acheampong E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7693331 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Tumour PD-L1 Expression in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Acheampong Emmanuel E Abed Afaf A Morici Michael M Bowyer Samantha S Amanuel Benhur B Lin Weitao W Millward Michael M Gray Elin S ES

Cells 20201031 11

<b>:</b> Antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1), and its ligand, (PD-L1) have been approved recently for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although there are previous reports that addressed PD-L1 detection on tumour cells in SCLC, there is no comprehensive meta-analysis on the prevalence of PD-L1 expression in SCLC. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases to assess reports on the prevalence of PD-L1 expression and the association ...[more]

PMID: 33142852

Similar Datasets

Project description:This network meta-analysis (NMA), based on one phase II and nine phase III studies, involving 6,124 patients with metastatic NSCLC, indirectly compares Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (ABC), Atezolizumab + chemotherapy (AC), Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (PC), Pembrolizumab alone, Bevacizumab + chemotherapy (BC) and chemotherapy alone. Each of these is recommended as front-line interventions, according to the US FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for advanced NSCLC without EGFR mutation or ALK rearrangement. Studies were identified through PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and abstracts found in oncology articles. Primary endpoints, i.e., progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with corresponding hazard ratios (HR), objective response rates (ORR) and adverse event (AEs) with odds risk (OR) were pooled according to frequentist network meta-analytical techniques. PD-L1 expression thresholds, as well as non-squamous/squamous were used to determine subgroups. Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy appeared superior to Pembrolizumab alone for PD-L1-high (i.e., TPS≥50%) NSCLC patients. BC might also be specifically recommended as an initial first-line treatment for PD-L1-high, non-squamous NSCLC patients, since BC was not inferior to Pembrolizumab alone. PC and ABC might be preferred for NSCLC patients with intermediate PD-L1 (1% ≤PD-L1, TPS<50%) expression. BC can also be tentatively recommended specifically for PD-L1-intermediate, non-squamous NSCLC patients. Combined immunotherapies can all be recommended for PD-L1-negative (i.e., TPS<1%) NSCLC patients, although especially the ABC combination for non-squamous NSCLC patients, which was superior to PC in regards of PFS. However, PC performed comparable to ABC in the whole population and in all subgroup save this one. More predictive biomarkers could be factored into further analyses to help identifying the most effective treatment regimens for specific patient groups.

Project description:BackgroundProgrammed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and ligand-2 (PD-L2) interaction with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) represent an immune-inhibiting checkpoint mediating immune evasion and is, accordingly, an important target for blockade-based immunotherapy in cancer. In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), improved understanding of PD-1 checkpoint blockade-responsive biology and identification of biomarkers for prediction of a clinical response to immunotherapy is warranted. Thus, in the present study, we systematically described PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression correlated genes in NSCLC.MethodsWe performed comparative retrospective analyses to identify PD-L1 and PD-L2 mRNA expression correlated genes in NSCLC. For this, we examined available datasets from the cancer cell line encyclopedia (CCLE) project lung non-small-cell (Lung_NSC) and the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) projects lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).ResultsAnalysis of the CCLE dataset Lung_NSC identified expression correlation between PD-L1 and PD-L2. Moreover, we identified expression correlation between 489 genes and PD-L1, 191 genes and PD-L2, and 111 genes for both. PD-L1 and PD-L2 also expression correlated in TCGA datasets LUAD and LUSC. In LUAD, we identified expression correlation between 257 genes and PD-L1, 914 genes and PD-L2, and 211 genes for both. In LUSC, we identified expression correlation between 26 genes and PD-L1, 326 genes and PD-L2, and 13 genes for both. Only a few genes expression correlated with PD-L1 and PD-L2 across the CCLE and TCGA datasets. Expression of Interferon signaling-involved genes converged in particular with the expression correlated genes for PD-L1 in Lung_NSC, for PD-L2 in LUSC, and for both PD-L1 and PD-L2 in LUAD. In LUSC, PD-L1, and to a lesser extent PD-L2, expression correlated with chromosome 9p24 localized genes, indicating a chromosome 9p24 topologically associated domain as an important driver of in particular LUSC PD-L1 expression. Expression correlation analyses of the PD-L1 and PD-L2 receptors programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), Cluster of differentiation 80 (CD80), and Repulsive guidance molecule B (RGMB) showed that PD-1 and CD80 expression correlated with both PD-L1 and PD-L2 in LUAD. CD80 expression correlated with PD-L2 in LUSC.ConclusionsWe present gene signatures associated with PD-L1 and PD-L2 mRNA expression in NSCLC which could possess importance in relation to understand PD-1 checkpoint blockade-responsive biology and development of gene signature based biomarkers for predicting clinical responses to immunotherapy.

Project description:BackgroundLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant subtype. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are widely used to treat stage IV NSCLC. This study systematically reviewed the literature to clarify the impact of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment on the survival of patients with stage III NSCLC.MethodsRandomized phase III clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors administered to patients with stage III NSCLC that were written in English and published between November 2012 and November 2022 were eligible for review. The sources of information were the MEDLINE database (last consulted on December 26, 2022), ScienceDirect website (last consulted on December 26, 2022), and CENTRAL register (last consulted on December 27, 2022). The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS). Risk of bias assessments were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0. The findings have been assessed for certainty according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.ResultsFourteen eligible studies and 2788 participants were included in the review. The key characteristics used to group the participants were disease histology, percentage of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, and timeline of therapy. OS and PFS were improved (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96 and RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, respectively) based on the use of PD-L1 inhibitors after chemoradiation and OS was improved using first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-squamous NSCLC (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17-0.95), with the GRADE results indicating moderate quality of evidence.ConclusionThis review highlights the OS and PFS benefits of PD-L1 inhibitors in stage III NSCLC when used after chemoradiation and OS benefits of first-line PD-1 inhibitors added to chemotherapy in non-squamous stage III disease.

Dataset Information

Tumour PD-L1 Expression in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Publications

Tumour PD-L1 Expression in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets